Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I hope this decision isnt solely based on 10 year old technology. The programs that are successful the next 10-15 years will have identified what changed in the sport post Covid, attract transfers ect. We are at a pivot point and I hope Dolson recognizes this in seeking out the next coach.

Posted
30 minutes ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:

Re: Brad Stevens.

Titus was joking but he’s also correct. The aura that hiring Stevens would make us championship contenders overnight isn’t the facts. He’s an incredible coach that any college would want but unrealistic expectations could hinder his desire to consider the job.

Granted, I want a coach that says, bring it on, in regards to expectations but much of the Brad Stevens hopium is greatly inflated.

He’d have his work cut out for him as well.

Anyway, hire Brad Stevens......


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners

Hi I’m new here, but I think Titus was actually making a joke about saying that about IU when the same thing can actually be said about the Celtics. 

Posted

Only way I would take Fife is if he had Belein on his staff. Preferably I would have John as the head coach but Dane probably won’t go for that.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

Posted
8 minutes ago, Hoosierfan2017 said:

I’ll never understand the obsession some have with getting an “IU guy.” First off, there aren’t former Hoosiers knocking it out of the park in college basketball. Second off, how many top schools have alums coaching them? Not very many. Bob Knight wasn’t even an IU guy when we hired him. 
 

IU basketball can be anything we want it to be. There are multiple ways to win. We can win in the 21st century without an “IU guy.” We just need a good coach with a good coach. No one will care if our coach isn’t an “IU guy” as long as they’re winning. 

There are examples though where someone from the program help continue the legacy.  
 

Izzo was a long time assistant at MSU

Roy at UNC. Even though he had success at Kansas UNC finally decided they wanted one of their own. 

Painter at Purdue. He had limited HC experience before coming on the PU staff to take over. 

I am sure there are others. 

Posted
14 minutes ago, 8bucks said:

There are examples though where someone from the program help continue the legacy.  
 

Izzo was a long time assistant at MSU

Roy at UNC. Even though he had success at Kansas UNC finally decided they wanted one of their own. 

Painter at Purdue. He had limited HC experience before coming on the PU staff to take over. 

I am sure there are others. 

There are some out there who succeed, but the majority of top coaches didn’t play at their universities. Roy Williams went to 4 final fours at Kansas before UNC hired him. If there was a proven IU guy out there right now I’d love to hire him. I’d be all for it. But that guy isn’t out there. We’d be sacrificing to hire an IU guy and I don’t want that. It might work out, but I don’t think that that’s a risk we can take right now. The time for an IU guy was after we fired Crean, imo. We have to go after someone proven. 

Posted
27 minutes ago, Hoosierfan2017 said:

I’ll never understand the obsession some have with getting an “IU guy.” First off, there aren’t former Hoosiers knocking it out of the park in college basketball. Second off, how many top schools have alums coaching them? Not very many. Bob Knight wasn’t even an IU guy when we hired him. 
 

IU basketball can be anything we want it to be. There are multiple ways to win. We can win in the 21st century without an “IU guy.” We just need a good coach with a good coach. No one will care if our coach isn’t an “IU guy” as long as they’re winning. 

I totally agree. I always wanted an IU guy, but what IU guy is killing it right now? I just want a guy that can get us back to the tourney every year and having a legit shot to win. 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...