A few thoughts for fun:
- $18M for last year's roster honestly seems too low. We at least put something like $14M rev share to FB, so just $4M NIL on top of that? Seems a little light... not a lot, just a little (I thought $21-22M seemed about right). But hey, maybe I am wrong, and regardless, Scott is countering the silly "bought a title" narrative, which is nice to see.
The fact we went 16-0 and won it all beating teams with 50% to nearly 100% more spent on their roster than we did is just the most amazing thing I've ever seen in college sports and likely will ever see.
- Cig said in a recent interview that we're top third of the B1G in resources now. Which is pretty darn great considering some of the big boys in the conference. IU's roster budget is way, way up from 2025.
- The article says 3-5x increase for HS talent... that seems a bit of an exaggeration. Though I'm sure it's up quite a bit.
- Something to keep in mind with our class is we don't know what IU is paying our commits. This is obviously very important and I suspect with all we can offer, we don't have to be the highest bid (as in if the money is equal, we'll get a player over a lot of other programs). If some school is blowing a lot of budget on high school kids who generally won’t contribute much for a year or two… well then enjoy the ranking on On3 or 24/7… but I doubt that’s a wise way to spend.
- Rev share deals can have performance incentives, NIL does, as it technically cannot be tied to playing, even though it's pay for play. But with the rev share fixed at $21-22M, I kinda doubt there are a ton of incentives… makes it hard to budget. What I think happens is when a player does well more NIL opportunities flood in.
Here is an example NIL agreement the B1G uses. https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/26460883/uw-nil-agreement.pdf. I haven't seen a rev share contract.