RaceToTheTop

Yeah, **** the Pacers for making the ECF because other teams had boo-boos.

I like Shrewsberry, but the amount of love he gets as a 50-51 coach is absurd.

Yeah, it sucked making the Eastern conference finals with a young team last year.

Question: Would you rather be medium efficiency, low volume threes, or low efficiency, medium volume?

Sikoa can't carry the bloodline storyline.

I understand — BUT how many players have been found guilty of breaking NIL laws? As long as the laws aren’t being broken, best get on board and use them to your advantage.

The courts have decided that players can profit from their NIL. In my opinion, they should be able to. While there might be NCAA legislation to try and control it, there is no way of guaranteeing that it would hold up in court.

Ain't digging past the surface cause I's really don't care.

Can't wait. Updated to a PS5 in anticipation last month.. Can't force myself to get it on July 15th, though. 3 days early for $30 seems pretty steep.

Oregon winning a title in his lifetime.....I think I have bread with greater expiration dates. They going to move the BCS title game up to the end this month to try to accomadate him?

Gotcha. Personally, I am not a fan of Northwestern's resume at all and think at best they should have been just on the right side of the bubble.

I was told there would be no Q&A.

The first was IU's in the hypothetical situation that they had beaten one of the U Conn, Kansas, Auburn trio -- the question I had asked is would IU have been in if they hadn't beaten one of those three and blown out the non-con they should have. U Conn and Auburn were Q1a games, Kansas was Q1b (just below 1a), so for the sake of argument let's just say that team A had one 1a win. The second team was Northwestern. They had two 1a wins but I do need to amend the 5-8 quad 1 record -- it was actually 4-7. The tournament games were put on Warren Nolan's sheet but shouldn't have been there. Northwestern put a non-conference schedule were they played SEVEN teams with a NET of 274 or worse (IU had one) and the Wildcats actually lost to one of those teams. Strength of victory for IU: 133. Strength of loss: 35. Northwestern strength of victory: 135. Strength of loss: 58. My contention is simply that Northwestern wasn't even really on the bubble -- they were a 9 seed. But in the scenario I provided -- IU getting one more win and beating bad teams by a decent margin -- I don't see much difference between IU and Northwestern in that scenario. IMO, Northwestern should have been a bubble team just making it instead of a 9 seed.

Which team would you pick? Team A: 20-13, Q1 4-8, Q2 6-4, Q3 4-1, Q4 6-0. Non-con NET SOS 122, Overall NET SOS 23 Team B: 21-11, Q1 5-8, Q2 5-3, Q3 5-0, Q4 7-1. Non-con NET SOS 330, Overall NET SOS 47