Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, WeeDerkaNaut said:

Jerry Krause's wife might have some enlightening insight on that particular question. Do we really want to risk a repeat of that? That was extremely ugly business. If you don't believe sports fanbases are and can get really bad, look at some futbol teams fans, or, if you need something closer to home, the recent situation with the Philly Eagles fan being permanently banned from watching them live. Eagles fans are very well known to be one of the most toxic and violent fanbases out there. So that's two different states that have had that, plus multiple countries. You honestly believe that it wouldn't happen around IU, one of the most storied sports teams in the states? 

There are, sadly, examples of the extreme behavior of emotionally charged “fans”, but they’re exceedingly rare and shouldn’t drive the decision as to whether a coach stays or goes. If that’s the standard, however, and if people think that could happen with our program and fan base, that would be beyond disappointing and sad. If it occurs, it won’t be because the University failed to fire Woodson in January rather than in early March.

Posted
7 minutes ago, KathywithaC said:

Name you best interim coaches (Eddie O got fired by LSU - oops, since he wasn’t a qualified HC).

I didn't make a claim either way because I don't have the data. However, let's go back to your original claim that an interim coach would only make the season worse because interim coaches largely make it worse. Let's not move the goalposts to interim coaches are not long term successes, which is a completely different argument. Moving the goalposts is a logical fallacy often used in place of facts, logic, or evidence in order to win an argument because of an emotional stake in the argument. It's bad process.

Anyway:

EddyO (thanks for doing my work for me)
Diebler last season at OSU

Now, I have as many anecdotal pieces of "evidence" that you do. Interim coaches can change the fortunes of a single season and it has happened numerous times. Interim coaches often improve the fortunes of a team for a single season while also not being retained for long term employment. In fact, that could be considered good process.

Posted
3 minutes ago, hper50 said:

Who cares how he does long term? We aren't looking for long-term results from whoever would be taking over

I get that - we’d just be looking to calm the overly emotional reaction of some fans who aren’t able to do that for themselves. Why would that be a good reason to do something?

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, KathywithaC said:

The process has been in place for decades and produced Bob Knight.

Now, here come the outright lies. Bob Knight was hired before any current processes and people were put into place. Also, a single data point is not conclusive evidence. Citing Bob Knight is an appeal to emotion in this argument.

By saying that the process is the same that hired Bob Knight, you have completely outed yourself as not an insider. You are another anonymous internet troll with opinions and agendas.

Edited by PartyintheVillas
Posted
2 minutes ago, Chris007 said:

But long-thought-out decisions have been great with this administration. Do you ever go home some days and say you know what I might be part of the problem?

What “long-thought-out-decisions” are you referring to? You seem to think this is a recent issue with IU, and it’s far from that. But it’s not the process, it’s the leadership. If you have insight into IU, this isn’t revelatory. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Hoosierfan2017 said:

We’ve reached the “players are tweeting at Dakich” point of the season. Luke Goode should probably just stay away from social media..

IMG_1597.thumb.jpeg.1324e09eccaa023842eb47df927d40ad.jpeg

This is pathetic, Luke. They all need to get off social media. At least during the season. Get in the gym and off your phone. Guarantee you he apologizes for this. 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...