HoosierPapi4 Posted February 26 Posted February 26 1 minute ago, Truthhurts said: Because the thread is meant to discuss coaching options and discussing Brad occupies most of the bandwidth with someone for whom there’s a zero percent chance of landing. Better question: why do people only entertain insider info if it aligns with what they wish to be true. I’m *telling* you people he is not going to be the coach at Indiana. I’d definitely give it higher than 0% lol Hoosierfanyuh and Chris007 2
spe317 Posted February 26 Posted February 26 10 minutes ago, Chris007 said: Why do all the new people always try dictate what Coaches we can talk about I thought this was a thread about Craig T Nelson’s replacement on the Coach reboot. DSUMMITT, Muskie plays the four, thebigweave and 2 others 3 2
Truthhurts Posted February 26 Posted February 26 Just now, HoosierPapi4 said: I’d definitely give it higher than 0% lol It is truly 0%. AkronHoosier 1
IUHoosierJoe Posted February 26 Posted February 26 14 minutes ago, Chris007 said: Why do all the new people always try dictate what Coaches we can talk about Maybe Rabby sent them Chris007, AZ Hoosier, lillurk and 1 other 3 1
Popular Post Chris007 Posted February 26 Popular Post Posted February 26 3 minutes ago, Truthhurts said: Because the thread is meant to discuss coaching options and discussing Brad wastes most of the thread bandwidth on someone with a zero percent probability. Better question: why do people only entertain insider info if it aligns with what they wish to be true. I’m *telling* you people he is not going to be the coach at Indiana. We’ve talked about many coaches all day and no one has complained until you showed up to try to control the conversation. Grow up. HoosierInParadise, HinnyHoosier, hoosierfan6157 and 36 others 30 9
HoosierPapi4 Posted February 26 Posted February 26 1 minute ago, Truthhurts said: It is truly 0%. I don’t think so. That’s okay for you to have your opinion though. Chris007 and AZ Hoosier 2
Herotime Posted February 26 Posted February 26 4 minutes ago, Truthhurts said: Because the thread is meant to discuss coaching options and discussing Brad wastes most of the thread bandwidth on someone for which there’s a zero percent chance of landing. Better question: why do people only entertain insider info if it aligns with what they wish to be true. I’m *telling* you people he is not going to be the coach at Indiana. Zero seems low cybergates, lillurk and Chris007 2 1
Popular Post Dave from Dayton Posted February 26 Popular Post Posted February 26 3 minutes ago, Truthhurts said: It is truly 0%. How do you know? Prove it. Until you provide better information...no one takes what you say as true. RaceToTheTop, JustWinBaby, mamasa and 9 others 12
hoosierbannerd Posted February 26 Posted February 26 Don't piss off the whale... RoadRage, lillurk, theriverpilot and 1 other 2 2
rayl456 Posted February 26 Posted February 26 6 minutes ago, Truthhurts said: Because the thread is meant to discuss coaching options and discussing Brad wastes most of the thread bandwidth on someone with a zero percent probability. Better question: why do people only entertain insider info if it aligns with what they wish to be true. I’m *telling* you people he is not going to be the coach at Indiana. Okay…thanks,TH. Chris007, thebigweave, Home Jersey and 1 other 2 2
Popular Post Eagle’s Rug Posted February 26 Popular Post Posted February 26 8 minutes ago, Truthhurts said: Because the thread is meant to discuss coaching options and discussing Brad wastes most of the thread bandwidth on someone with a zero percent probability. Better question: why do people only entertain insider info if it aligns with what they wish to be true. I’m *telling* you people he is not going to be the coach at Indiana. Chris007, iu eyedoc, wirenuts and 34 others 6 1 30
Popular Post TheWatShot Posted February 26 Popular Post Posted February 26 Wasting thread bandwidth, lol. That's a new one. Good to see the hall monitors are back to bringing the heat tonight. Last night was weak sauce. theriverpilot, Asha’man, icemunky69 and 17 others 10 10
Popular Post Uspshoosier Posted February 26 Popular Post Posted February 26 10 minutes ago, Truthhurts said: Because the thread is meant to discuss coaching options And that’s what goes on throughout the day in this thread. McCollum, DeVries, Drew, Cronin, Pitino Jr, heck I’ve even seen Schertz being discussed all in the last 8 hrs. Stevens gets mentioned as well but why do you care if he does? Just put your finger in the middle your phone and swipe up and the Stevens posts disappear and you can keep scrolling and find a candidate you feel is better suited to talk about and then post about them. rcbowla, VFury, RaceToTheTop and 15 others 16 2
Truthhurts Posted February 26 Posted February 26 5 minutes ago, Chris007 said: We’ve talked about many coaches all day and no one has complained until you showed up to try to control the conversation. Grow up. Says the guy who posts BS to string strangers along 107 times a week to win internet points. AH1971 and 4iufourever 1 1
Ctf9 Posted February 26 Posted February 26 9 minutes ago, Truthhurts said: Because the thread is meant to discuss coaching options and discussing Brad wastes most of the thread bandwidth on someone with a zero percent probability. Better question: why do people only entertain insider info if it aligns with what they wish to be true. I’m *telling* you people he is not going to be the coach at Indiana. Are you saying that if you have insider info that says he’s not going to coach here? Why not share that and give us a sense of your sourcing instead of being cranky? Everyone in here is having a good time. (Just don’t ask about a couple of guys yesterday lol.) thebigweave, Chris007, Dave from Dayton and 1 other 4
Truthhurts Posted February 26 Posted February 26 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Dave from Dayton said: How do you know? Prove it. Until you provide better information...no one takes what you say as true. I’m not going to reveal how I know on a public forum. That would be stupid. But what’s funny is no one requires or ask for proof of source when someone claims to have info that aligns with what they wish to be true. Edited February 26 by Truthhurts RaceToTheTop, woodenshoemanHoosierfan, FWA-EVV and 3 others 3 3
Popular Post HoosierSadaseci Posted February 26 Popular Post Posted February 26 9 minutes ago, Truthhurts said: Because the thread is meant to discuss coaching options and discussing Brad wastes most of the thread bandwidth on someone with a zero percent probability. Better question: why do people only entertain insider info if it aligns with what they wish to be true. I’m *telling* you people he is not going to be the coach at Indiana. If it bothers you, then skip over the Brad talk...don't try to tell others who they can and can't discuss... Home Jersey, BtownStrength, tkbbn and 12 others 15
Popular Post DougJr74 Posted February 26 Popular Post Posted February 26 2 minutes ago, Truthhurts said: Says the guy who posts BS to string strangers along 107 times a week to win internet points. You have issues. RaceToTheTop, BtownStrength, Home Jersey and 8 others 11
Popular Post Unexpectedflash Posted February 26 Popular Post Posted February 26 2 minutes ago, Truthhurts said: Says the guy who posts BS to string strangers along 107 times a week to win internet points. Some version of this post happens every other day at this point and it’s honestly so tiring. Who cares what people on the internet post lillurk, Chris007, Hoosierfanyuh and 9 others 11 1
Truthhurts Posted February 26 Posted February 26 2 minutes ago, Ctf9 said: Are you saying that if you have insider info that says he’s not going to coach here? Why not share that and give us a sense of your sourcing instead of being cranky? Everyone in here is having a good time. (Just don’t ask about a couple of guys yesterday lol.) Yes. HoosierSadaseci and RaceToTheTop 2
Recommended Posts