94Bulldog

I’ll never eat at Jersey Mikes, God I hate Rutgers and Big 10 refs.

Embarassing

As one will likes to partake in wagering, I find that the 3.5 pt line seems like the books are considering our past struggles vs Rutgers, not what the actual teams are doing this year. Rutgers has played 2 legit teams, losing to both. Haslametrics says we should win by 5. I’m putting the wife’s Christmas present money on the Hoosiers!

So in Mullins case, I read this to mean there has been at least some interest from IU communicated to him or his coaches through HS or AAU?

For those who may know, are unofficial visits done by invite only or can anyone say I’m taking an unofficial?

Lots of bright spots but I still have zero confidence when Race and Tamar shoot from 3.

Shoot me, but I don’t want Race starting at the 4. I love his effort, but we’ve seen this movie before and it doesn’t work well for our offense and he gets beat by smaller 4s on the perimeter. My preferred starting 5 X - the X of the last 10 games is needed for all of them JHS - I’ve seen enough to believe he can’t be kept off the floor Kopp - I’m selling myself on the fact with 2 PG types who can beat their man and drive, Kopp can be free to spot up for the open 3. If not, give me JG at the 3. I prefer JG starting at the 4. I think overall he brings more than Race with far more potential. If he’s at the 3, I wanna see Malik which I’m sure people will question. Probably my bias against Race on the floor with TJD at the same time. TJD - nothing needs to be said. I want Bates to be in the discussion at the 2/3 but honestly he’s shown very little to warrant that. I love Galloway but unless he develops more offense, particularly a consistent jump shot. He’s a bench spark plug that can play 1-3. Leal, Duncomb, Gunn, and probably Banks imo won’t see the floor after December non Conf blowouts.

Surprised no one is concerned about Virginia, since he plans to visit there as well. That all said, I like where we seem to stand.

I’m ok with Race staying, but I hope it’s not at the expense of Jordan G. Also, we can no longer reference Brad Davidson or Jordan Bohannon jokes.

Believe they get 15 scholarships on the women’s team.

For me, I don’t need them feeling comfortable he can play the 3. I need them acknowledging that’s he’s a better stretch 4 than Race and explain to Race that if he returns, it’s likely as a backup.

“Landers” says thank you, albeit no longer our player.

IMO 2 more is 100%, 3 more is 90% and 4 more is 50%. My preference is 3 more.

Parker’s tweet

There’s a press release from Woodson. Based on it, I think your headline might need to be changed because it sure sounds like Woodson made the call and it wasn’t Dane’s choice.