Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

JaybobHoosier

General Coach Candidate News

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Chris007 said:

Let's get this on record since I have said it repeatedly on here. I think Stevens is the first choice. I think there are talks or have been talks there. I think we can do that right now because May is still playing. We have more time to work with Stevens. If Dusty is the guy I think I would be the happiest person. I was on this board for months last year saying hire him. From what I have been told from people here at the university, donors, and others, Scott thinks he has a shot this time. What I say here has no bearing on any of that. I'm just sharing what I hear is going on. Sometimes it's correct and sometimes it's not. I think we are in a good position with Brad, but Dolson might already have a deal done for Dusty. To me either is a win-win. 

I can tell you at a minimum there’s no deal for anyone right now. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Chris007 said:

I appreciate your post. What can you tell me about the maximum? If you feel you need to DM me to tell me everything you know go for it, I'm happy to share my side. 

I do know there’s no deal as of yet. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, wirenuts said:

Unless you are scott dolson or Whitten there is absolutely no way you can definitely say that

True not definitively but you can say that with a reasonable degree of certainty IMO. Theres no way you have a deal with anyone actively coaching another team right now. That takes 99% of candidates off the table, unless we are getting either the white whale or Mark Turgeon. Which I’d assume are both close to 0 as of now. There could a “deal” as in an understanding of mutual interest but most likely not any kind of actual agreement on a contract. IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, wirenuts said:

Unless you are scott dolson or Whitten there is absolutely no way you can definitely say that

I suppose that’s sort of true but it would also make for a very weird scenario where they’re talking to at least one prospective hire despite having a deal in place? Doesn’t make much sense right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, TheDMV said:

I suppose that’s sort of true but it would also make for a very weird scenario where they’re talking to at least one prospective hire despite having a deal in place? Doesn’t make much sense right?

Unless it's just a verbal agreement, which in case if I was the AD I would probably want to have conversations with backup plans at the very least in case the verbal agreement had fallen short. 

Just like in recruiting, verbal agreements between coach and university probably get rescinded a lot more than we maybe think. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, wirenuts said:

if I was the AD I would probably want to have conversations with backup plans at the very least in case the verbal agreement had fallen short. 

 

Not like this. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×