End up like Boston College…? A school with no money, tradition, fans or history? What? Churning through coaches every three years is how you end up like Boston College (record wise and a place no decent coaching candidate will give any real consideration).
And how do you define “something to believe in”? Because the following coaches would have all been fired using your criteria:
Mike Krzyzewski - 34-47 in his first three seasons at Duke, no NCAAT appearances
Jay Wright - 52-46 in his first three seasons at Nova, no NCAAT appearances
Tony Bennett - 76-53 in his first four seasons at Virginia, one NCAAT appearance (no tournament wins)
John Beilein - 46-53 in his first three seasons at Michigan, one NCAAT appearance after finishing 7th in the B1G (one tournament win)
Scott Drew - 81-95 in his first six seasons at Baylor, one NCAAT appearance (no tournament wins)
Kelvin Sampson - 56-40 in his first three seasons at Houston, no NCAAT appearances
I am in no way saying we hire someone who very likely would struggle coaching at this level (e.g., Ben Jacobson). But again, we have made it past the SW16 ONCE in 32 years. This program needs some stability and a cultural enema. The coaching market isn’t what it used to be. We’ve found this out. Kentucky has found this out. UNC is about to find this out. Meanwhile Nebraska is finally killing it with a competent coach that took serval years to get going.