Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, RoadRage said:

That is a head scratcher, not sure why Michigan would agree to that low buyout?

Two options:

  1. Dusty demanded/negotiated it.
  2. Michigan wanted an "out" in case Dusty was a bust.

take your pick.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Chris007 said:

Yes Glass told Quinn he would hire Mike if they agreed to let Crean go. Then went behind his back to Archie and never even interviewed Mike

For all of Glass' faults... he was genius with that move... but Buckner ended up screwing over the basketball program any way...power corrupts. Absolutely power corrupts absolutely.

Posted
1 hour ago, Hornsby said:

Bozich says 0% chance. Our insiders say numbers have been discussed. Somebody will be dead wrong.

Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk
 

So our insiders have said numbers have been discussed with Stevens recently? When was this mentioned? 

Posted
Just now, AZ Hoosier said:

Two options:

  1. Dusty demanded/negotiated it.
  2. Michigan wanted an "out" in case Dusty was a bust.

take your pick.

It's not #2 since his buyout for getting fired is 70% of his remaining contract which comes out to something like $10.5-11M.

There are 2 different buyouts.

Posted
1 minute ago, AZ Hoosier said:

Two options:

  1. Dusty demanded/negotiated it.
  2. Michigan wanted an "out" in case Dusty was a bust.

take your pick.

Your #2 would refer to a different buyout clause

Posted
1 minute ago, go iu bb said:

It's not #2 since his buyout for getting fired is 70% of his remaining contract which comes out to something like $10.5-11M.

There are 2 different buyouts.

 

1 minute ago, IUHoosierJoe said:

Your #2 would refer to a different buyout clause

Well, that only leaves one option. /s

Posted
2 minutes ago, AZ Hoosier said:

Two options:

  1. Dusty demanded/negotiated it.
  2. Michigan wanted an "out" in case Dusty was a bust.

take your pick.

I think it is definitely #1….and why would Dusty demand such a low buyout? Maybe he was up front with them and said if IU opens up and they offer I will likely take it. Or maybe we are over-estimating his interest, maybe he has his eye on another opening?

Posted
1 minute ago, AZ Hoosier said:

 

Well, that only leaves one option. /s

Indeed. Schools want the buyout for a coach leaving to be as high as possible while coaches want just the opposite. It's obvious that May/his agent worked to get it low.

Posted
1 minute ago, Chris007 said:

It was last week. I've heard 10 years 92 million and also 8 years 85 million.

Either is fine with me since it's not my money. Also heard we can go more if we have too

10 years 100 mill, his choice of buildings to be named after him, and we replace the chairs and sanitize AH to make sure Woodson doesn't rub off on anyone in his staff.

Posted
4 minutes ago, RoadRage said:

I think it is definitely #1….and why would Dusty demand such a low buyout? Maybe he was up front with them and said if IU opens up and they offer I will likely take it. Or maybe we are over-estimating his interest, maybe he has his eye on another opening?

Michigan would have never hired him if he told them he was going to leave after one year if another conference team's job came open in my opinion. The low buy out is on Michigan's end. 

Posted
13 minutes ago, AZ Hoosier said:

Two options:

  1. Dusty demanded/negotiated it.
  2. Michigan wanted an "out" in case Dusty was a bust.

take your pick.

Pure speculation but maybe Dusty just placed a huge bet on what he could do.  Not push for a large buyout in the initial contract.  Have a really good year and now can sit at the table and say OK boys, what are you going to do for me today.  He has leverage especially with our opening.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...