AH1971 Posted February 11 Posted February 11 9 minutes ago, Napleshoosier said: That was a nightmare for them I’ve been told he was closer to taking the Louisville job than Kentucky job. Junior Bridgeman is a wealthy donor and alum there from the Region who is great friends with Drew family, and even he couldn’t persuade the wife. cybergates 1
tyappleg Posted February 11 Posted February 11 13 minutes ago, 4iufourever said: Why? If he is your guy then announce him as the next coach and sign the contract. Date it the day after Woodson's last day as the coach/end of the IU season. Doesn't make sense to wait in my opinion, but I'm not a lawyer, admin, or anyone that deals with contracts. Has anything like this ever happened? A new coach being signed while the current coach is still coaching games? thebigweave 1
Popular Post 8bucks Posted February 11 Popular Post Posted February 11 2 hours ago, JerryYeagley23 said: I disagree. My inbox is always open if this new poster wants to share sources and info. Private message to those with inside information they need to verify: If the insiders mailboxes happen to be full, I am usually the backup. So send to me and I will pass along to JY, Chris, AP or whomever. Just don't tell the others posters who are not reading this because it was a Private Message to you. Home Jersey, pumpfake, Hoosier DaDa and 11 others 3 11
TargaFlorio Posted February 11 Posted February 11 1 minute ago, tyappleg said: Has anything like this ever happened? A new coach being signed while the current coach is still coaching games? Feels like it happens in college football occasionally when the retiring or outgoing coach still coaches the bowl game and the new coach is already on the job. Can't remember it happening in hoops, though. Chris007 1
OKHOOSIER Posted February 11 Posted February 11 1 minute ago, Chris007 said: BoT. I don’t think so. If Scott wants them and so does Pam the board better approve them. I’ve wondered this for a while, is anything about having BOT this involved or controlling AD decisions remotely normal? It feels like athletic departments that are dual successful you don’t hear about board people or former board people having anything to do with the AD unless there are really weird circumstances. I am sure it happens, but it just seems like IU is unwilling to let the athletic director do their job. The board should just be saying “aye” to the things the AD wants to do. Alford Bailey, Home Jersey, pumpfake and 1 other 4
Hoosier Guy Posted February 11 Posted February 11 23 minutes ago, GP711 said: If I am wrong I will be the first to own up to it, and this is not a guarantee, but my official prediction is Brad. I’m not just guessing, we shall see! I’ll continue to manifest. lillurk 1
Alford Bailey Posted February 11 Posted February 11 3 minutes ago, OKHOOSIER said: I’ve wondered this for a while, is anything about having BOT this involved or controlling AD decisions remotely normal? It feels like athletic departments that are dual successful you don’t hear about board people or former board people having anything to do with the AD unless there are really weird circumstances. I am sure it happens, but it just seems like IU is unwilling to let the athletic director do their job. The board should just be saying “aye” to the things the AD wants to do. It’s not normal to this extent OKHOOSIER 1
Popular Post JF87 Posted February 11 Popular Post Posted February 11 I assume our next coach will have to use the portal his first couple of years. Ultimately, I'd prefer our next coach build the team through high school recruiting and only bring in a portal player as needed. I would prefer the Purdue model of just one portal player in the past three years than what Woodson was doing. Winning is the ultimate goal, but watching the players develop year over year is fun as well. IUHAHN81, TrueHoosier62, Willkie71 and 7 others 9 1
Popular Post RoadToZion Posted February 11 Popular Post Posted February 11 Dusty 60% Brad 40% Chances as of today. IMO. Pryght, raorIU, HoosierPapi4 and 20 others 17 1 1 4
Popular Post Chris007 Posted February 11 Popular Post Posted February 11 3 minutes ago, OKHOOSIER said: I’ve wondered this for a while, is anything about having BOT this involved or controlling AD decisions remotely normal? It feels like athletic departments that are dual successful you don’t hear about board people or former board people having anything to do with the AD unless there are really weird circumstances. I am sure it happens, but it just seems like IU is unwilling to let the athletic director do their job. The board should just be saying “aye” to the things the AD wants to do. I think that’s what we’re seeing here. Remember last time we had board members, boosters and everyone else trying to be involved. So you either have to lead them away or tell them to stay out of it. I think both is happening here. OKHOOSIER, Muskie plays the four, tkbbn and 6 others 8 1
JimmerNoe Posted February 11 Posted February 11 2 minutes ago, RoadToZion said: Dusty 60% Brad 40% Chances as of today. IMO. Do you feel these numbers are significantly different than a few days ago? And if so, moved in which direction? lillurk 1
tyappleg Posted February 11 Posted February 11 3 minutes ago, RoadToZion said: Dusty 60% Brad 40% Chances as of today. IMO. You mixed up the names. thebigweave, IUHAHN81, HoosierInParadise and 2 others 3 2
cleeter Posted February 11 Posted February 11 Do you feel these numbers are significantly different than a few days ago? And if so, moved in which direction?I can’t speak for RTZ obviously, but from the overall sense of his posts last few days, I would have figured those would have been reversed. Could just have been me taking his posts the wrong way, unless something has changed last few days, etc. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk MikeRoberts and lillurk 2
Herotime Posted February 11 Posted February 11 8 minutes ago, RoadToZion said: Dusty 60% Brad 40% Chances as of today. IMO. Has that fluctuated any?
Chris007 Posted February 11 Posted February 11 6 minutes ago, tyappleg said: You mixed up the names. It’s probably the sake again. Hoosierfanyuh, IUHAHN81, thebigweave and 2 others 2 3
Hornsby Posted February 11 Posted February 11 Dusty 60% Brad 40% Chances as of today. IMO.What changed. I thought stevens was the guy.Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk MikeRoberts 1
bobknightsghost Posted February 11 Posted February 11 30 minutes ago, Chris007 said: Because he’s the president of the Celtics and not the head coach of IU. Maybe because he built this team and wants to see them win back to back NBA championships. That makes no sense. NBA playoffs don’t start until the middle of April. If he’s taking the IU job he would be looooonnnnggg gone before seeing the Celtics win back to back championships. MikeRoberts 1
8bucks Posted February 11 Posted February 11 31 minutes ago, RaceToTheTop said: I am going to go out on a limb and say that Scott Drew's version of Christianity would not preclude him from leaving a Christian school. Would seem funny if a coach threatened to have a player deported if they didn't go to their school would draw the line at coaching at a non-Christian school. He can be a solid Christian and still make occasional stupid decisions. The apostle Paul who wrote much of the New Testament hunted Christians and was there watching as Stephen was stoned. JHoosier914, FWHoosier84, woodenshoemanHoosierfan and 3 others 4 2
Stuhoo Posted February 11 Posted February 11 3 minutes ago, 8bucks said: He can be a solid Christian and still make occasional stupid decisions. The apostle Paul who wrote much of the New Testament hunted Christians and was there watching as Stephen was stoned. *not referring to coach in waiting Stephen Pearl - he’s a Jewish kid. (aaaannnd… presto! back on topic)
IUHAHN81 Posted February 11 Posted February 11 5 minutes ago, Chris007 said: It’s probably the sake again. That LAST sake post cut me deep man! Real darn deep! SlammySammy and Chris007 1 1
Recommended Posts