Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Trish said:

Can we not joke around on here anymore?! 

Sorry; it's hard to tell whose joking and whose not. I apologize, but there are those on the board who would post something like that and be serious. 

Posted
1 hour ago, 8bucks said:

What exactly did he inherit?  Didn’t he have to bring in around 9-10 players. Did he inherit a staff or did he have to bring that too. 

A winning mindset.  If you listen to Cig when he got here he couldn’t believe the “loser mentality” we had with football.  He really had to focus on that with the administration and the fans, like getting the fans to stick around during the game.  

Posted
9 hours ago, go iu bb said:

I added up the salaries I saw for the assistant coaches under Woodson to get that number. 

Hunter: $432k

Rosemond: $410k

Walsh: $225k

Those add up to less than $1.1M. I think they also get retention bonuses that a are in the 10s of thousands and bonuses so they do make more than that but not a ton. 

I've looked at few other assistant coaches at other schools and they made more. Luke Murray at UConn is making $750k. Murphy at Alabama is making $450k which is on par with ours but still more. 

I agree that that total for IU seems low, which is why I'm hoping they increase the budget like they did for football. Give the program a chance to hire a big time assistant and retain him for pretty much anything except for a HC job.

These are tricky numbers to find. 

Latest Mind Your Banners pod Osterman said IU had the largest staff budget in the B1G last year and it was one of the tops in the country (if not the top, wow).  This does line up with the very large overall operating budget IUBB has.

I would guess at IU CDD will have the budget to basically hire whoever he wants.  It seems like CDD typically has a large staff, so we should have a lot of staff announcements coming soon.

Also, this latest pod is a good one.  They talked to some coaches on an anonymous basis that faced CDD throughout the years, etc. and it's pretty interesting stuff.

Posted
15 minutes ago, GP711 said:

I think had they both said yes right away it would be McCollum. However, there were concerns with him. Scott had concerns about his high-level recruiting. Credit to trilly on that nugget:)

McCollum as much as I like him this would have been the biggest issue.  Great coach.  Question with him will be consistency at this level.  If I was him I would be very choosy where I ended up.  I wanted him here but I also don’t think it would have been the best fit for him.  He is a great basketball mind though.  I think DeVries if you think about it will be the better fit long term.  

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...