JSHoosier Posted February 12 Posted February 12 Just now, Trish said: The first rumor of Mike Woodson being considered was a dark day in american history. March 28, 2021 a date that will live in IUBB infamy. Chris007, JaybobHoosier, thebigweave and 4 others 4 3
Popular Post Chris007 Posted February 12 Popular Post Posted February 12 6 minutes ago, OGIUAndy said: So our insiders have said numbers have been discussed with Stevens recently? When was this mentioned? It was last week. I've heard 10 years 92 million and also 8 years 85 million. Either is fine with me since it's not my money. Also heard we can go more if we have too PartyintheVillas, Artie86, FWHoosier84 and 12 others 15
Class of '66 Old Fart Posted February 12 Posted February 12 11 minutes ago, bobknightsghost said: What do you make of Osterman saying 5% chance Brad is the next coach? Planned deflection to try to quell the speculation with a gentle nudge from Dolson to Osterman. VFury, kottke, Jeff Flabjohns and 2 others 5
JSHoosier Posted February 12 Posted February 12 1 minute ago, Chris007 said: It was last week. I've heard 10 years 92 million and also 8 years 85 million. Either is fine with me since it's not my money. Also heard we can go more if we have too 10 years 100 mill, his choice of buildings to be named after him, and we replace the chairs and sanitize AH to make sure Woodson doesn't rub off on anyone in his staff. DLG3, Muskie plays the four, Chris007 and 4 others 3 4
sirhoosierlot Posted February 12 Posted February 12 4 minutes ago, RoadRage said: I think it is definitely #1….and why would Dusty demand such a low buyout? Maybe he was up front with them and said if IU opens up and they offer I will likely take it. Or maybe we are over-estimating his interest, maybe he has his eye on another opening? Michigan would have never hired him if he told them he was going to leave after one year if another conference team's job came open in my opinion. The low buy out is on Michigan's end. T White, thebigweave and MikeRoberts 3
Class of '66 Old Fart Posted February 12 Posted February 12 13 minutes ago, AZ Hoosier said: Two options: Dusty demanded/negotiated it. Michigan wanted an "out" in case Dusty was a bust. take your pick. Pure speculation but maybe Dusty just placed a huge bet on what he could do. Not push for a large buyout in the initial contract. Have a really good year and now can sit at the table and say OK boys, what are you going to do for me today. He has leverage especially with our opening. Muskie plays the four, AZ Hoosier, T White and 3 others 6
RoadRage Posted February 12 Posted February 12 1 minute ago, Chris007 said: It was last week. I've heard 10 years 92 million and also 8 years 85 million. Either is fine with me since it's not my money. Also heard we can go more if we have too I’m going to put some chum in the water for Brad lovers….is he really so irreplaceable for the Celtics? Aren’t there other guys capable of doing what he is doing? Not saying he isn’t good at what he does, but some people have made him sound like some kind of irreplaceable basketball management genius! T White 1
IUHoosierJoe Posted February 12 Posted February 12 1 minute ago, sirhoosierlot said: Michigan would have never hired him if he told them he was going to leave after one year if another conference team's job came open in my opinion. The low buy out is on Michigan's end. Michigan has absolutely no advantage to a low buyout other than it got them a great coach. Hoosierfanyuh and HinnyHoosier 2
go iu bb Posted February 12 Posted February 12 2 minutes ago, Chris007 said: It was last week. I've heard 10 years 92 million and also 8 years 85 million. Either is fine with me since it's not my money. Also heard we can go more if we have too I hope it's the 8/85M if this is accurate. That's ~$1.5M/year more than the other deal plus not as long of a commitment if it somehow didn't work out. So a better deal for both sides, imo. thebigweave, RoadRage, Chris007 and 1 other 4
RoadRage Posted February 12 Posted February 12 2 minutes ago, sirhoosierlot said: Michigan would have never hired him if he told them he was going to leave after one year if another conference team's job came open in my opinion. The low buy out is on Michigan's end. What do you mean on their end, how does this favor them? There is a second buyout that protects Dusty from them letting him go early, it is much more than $4M Hoosierfanyuh and go iu bb 2
Motley's Posted February 12 Posted February 12 5 minutes ago, RoadRage said: I’m going to put some chum in the water for Brad lovers….is he really so irreplaceable for the Celtics? Aren’t there other guys capable of doing what he is doing? Not saying he isn’t good at what he does, but some people have made him sound like some kind of irreplaceable basketball management genius! OK, who do you replace him with? J34 and Pagoda 2
Hornsby Posted February 12 Posted February 12 The first rumor of Mike Woodson being considered was a dark day in american history. I did not take it seriously cause I thought it was a total joke. I didn't think they were really dumb enough to hire him.Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk Trish and Kentuckysucks 2
Magisterium Posted February 12 Posted February 12 24 minutes ago, Chris007 said: Yes Glass told Quinn he would hire Mike if they agreed to let Crean go. Then went behind his back to Archie and never even interviewed Mike That’s pretty much what I was told, which might explain Woody telling Dolson et al 4 years later that they would have to come to New York rather than him coming to Bloomington if they wanted to talk with him etc
Hornsby Posted February 12 Posted February 12 It was last week. I've heard 10 years 92 million and also 8 years 85 million. Either is fine with me since it's not my money. Also heard we can go more if we have tooJust lock him up. That would be a top 5 ncaa salary. Maybe tops.Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk
Popular Post Chris007 Posted February 12 Popular Post Posted February 12 8 minutes ago, RoadRage said: I’m going to put some chum in the water for Brad lovers….is he really so irreplaceable for the Celtics? Aren’t there other guys capable of doing what he is doing? Not saying he isn’t good at what he does, but some people have made him sound like some kind of irreplaceable basketball management genius! He has a GM and been training Ainge's son so he can leave RoadRage, Artie86, hoosierfan6157 and 5 others 8
Chris007 Posted February 12 Posted February 12 Just now, Hornsby said: Just lock him up. That would be a top 5 ncaa salary. Maybe tops. Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk Self is the top paid at 9.6 Hoosierfanyuh 1
eddy4iu Posted February 12 Posted February 12 1 hour ago, Chris007 said: I'm sitting close to Scott Friday night so I'll report back. If he has a farmers tan then I know he was at the beach I'll be sitting close to him as well.
OGIUAndy Posted February 12 Posted February 12 13 minutes ago, Chris007 said: It was last week. I've heard 10 years 92 million and also 8 years 85 million. Either is fine with me since it's not my money. Also heard we can go more if we have too OK. I did hear the 10 years 92 million. Chris007 1
IUHoosierJoe Posted February 12 Posted February 12 3 minutes ago, Motley's said: OK, who do you replace him with? Nothing like going out on top. ;) RoadRage 1
Popular Post Chris007 Posted February 12 Popular Post Posted February 12 Just now, eddy4iu said: I'll be sitting close to him as well. As soon I hear someone say Eddy I'm jumping out of my seat to say HI pumpfake, Hovadipo, 8bucks and 5 others 6 2
Recommended Posts