Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, 8bucks said:

I agree.  Not sure I trust Sparks to back up MR though when he gets in foul trouble.  

Hey, Sparks has to get that reverse layup attempt to go eventually. Not all of them can hit the bottom of the backboard.

Posted

So last week I said I was out on the program and I meant it, at that time. After cooling off (took entire week) I realized that was said in anger. I'm still mostly indifferent but I will always root for the Hoosiers. Which is why I for the 3,000 time say.....go away Woody....just go away. Anyhow, yeah I was one of those guys but dammit I'm sick and tired of the crap we are being fed.

Posted
So last week I said I was out on the program and I meant it, at that time. After cooling off (took entire week) I realized that was said in anger. I'm still mostly indifferent but I will always root for the Hoosiers. Which is why I for the 3,000 time say.....go away Woody....just go away. Anyhow, yeah I was one of those guys but dammit I'm sick and tired of the crap we are being fed.
I didn't care the 3 games before msu. I watched them but couldn't get into them. Never really had that happen. Was excited for senior night game and cheered most of it. Probably alchohol related lol. I am excited for big 10 tournament and I think why I wasn't before was I didn't have hope. I have hope now so we will probably get destroyed game 1 lol. Woodson and leals speech pissed me off! Mostly because I feel it makes them look weak. Hopefully they prove me wrong!
Fire Woodson unless he wins the big 10 tournament! Lol

Sent from my SM-A326U using Tapatalk

Posted
Just now, coonhounds said:

Really sad ngw is gone. Couldn't a couple day ban better fit the crime? To think at the end I just realized all his efforts were to protect us all from false information. Proves good deeds do get punished or something like that.
Fire Woodson!

Sent from my SM-A326U using Tapatalk
 

Don't worry, Cathy is here to take his place. She just hangs out in the Liam decommitting thread

Posted
4 minutes ago, Home Jersey said:

Don't worry, Cathy is here to take his place. She just hangs out in the Liam decommitting thread

First off I need an alert to tell me when she is around, secondly, I rush over there to read her insight and I can't make anything out of it. She just talks in circles that I guess are over my head. 

If I got any of it correctly I think she is saying that everyone in the athletic department & basketball department are thrilled with how everything is going. Please someone break it down a little for me. Is that what she is saying? Maybe I need her to type slower :-)

Posted
47 minutes ago, Schreckbagger said:

Nope, I don't really get into multiple message boards. But apparently, one of our current players' mother has had concerns about the CMW rumors, so this nonsense here just adds to uncertainty retaining players, and/or recruiting new players. If you don't think recruits talk to each other......get over it.

Sent from my SM-S906U using BtownBanners mobile app
 

If mommy thinks the problems are the CMW rumors, she ain't seen nothing yet.  

Posted
5 minutes ago, Chris007 said:

First off I need an alert to tell me when she is around, secondly, I rush over there to read her insight and I can't make anything out of it. She just talks in circles that I guess are over my head. 

If I got any of it correctly I think she is saying that everyone in the athletic department & basketball department are thrilled with how everything is going. Please someone break it down a little for me. Is that what she is saying? Maybe I need her to type slower :-)

I basically think she is more or less saying "every coach at IU is going to get their 4, and people really like Woody, so why would you ever think he wouldn't?" Like... that seems to be her POV, all the corporate jargon/speaking in circles is just window dressing.

But hey, she works in the administration so that is why it's simple for her and so complex to everybody else. Just like Mike said... if you're not a "true fan," you can never really understand. 

Posted

This is not directed at any particular poster; just noticing a trend:

While it's 100% appropriate to push back on anyone's opinion, it is unadvisable toward the quality of the board's discourse to accuse posters with differing points of view of having an 'agenda'. 

Ngw bailed in a hail of accusations leveled by him and at him of having some hidden agenda--that's a shame because it didn't need to be that way.

A potentially repetitive group trampling of those with opinions differing from the vast majority is allowed. But to me? Not a good idea in the long run.

Semi-rant over. Love y'all!

Posted
2 minutes ago, Home Jersey said:

I basically think she is more or less saying "every coach at IU is going to get their 4, and people really like Woody, so why would you ever think he wouldn't?" Like... that seems to be her POV, all the corporate jargon/speaking in circles is just window dressing.

But hey, she works in the administration so that is why it's simple for her and so complex to everybody else. Just like Mike said... if you're not a "true fan," you can never really understand. 

Thank you. It's not like we're going to hold her to answering a question. But I regress papa is smacking us down. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Golfman25 said:

Kind of interesting.  1 leaves.  1 returns.  ?????

Their topics are so different though i don't think it is him.  I know prior boards could determine if the poster was posting from the same location.  Can this still be done?

Posted
1 minute ago, Stuhoo said:

 

 

Just my opinion:

While it's 100% appropriate to push back on anyone's opinion, it is unadvisable toward the quality of the board's discourse to accuse posters with differing points of view of having an 'agenda'. 

Ngw bailed in a hail of accusations leveled by him and at him of having some hidden agenda--that's a shame because it didn't need to be that way.

A potentially repetitive group trampling of those with opinions different from the vast majority is allowed. But to me? Not a good idea in the long run.

Semi-rant over. Love y'all!

Yeah, I rather enjoyed some of the discourse.  I didn't agree with much of it.  But I did agree with some of it.   I'm sure we will get a told you so next season if Woody and staff build a monster and flips this MFer.  

And if he stays, I certainly hope he does.

I personally think Woody is worried about the wrong stuff but maybe his competitiveness will win out and he will build a roster good enough.  

I never give up hope no matter how dim the forecast is.  

Posted
6 minutes ago, Stuhoo said:

This is not directed at any particular poster; just noticing a trend:

While it's 100% appropriate to push back on anyone's opinion, it is unadvisable toward the quality of the board's discourse to accuse posters with differing points of view of having an 'agenda'. 

Ngw bailed in a hail of accusations leveled by him and at him of having some hidden agenda--that's a shame because it didn't need to be that way.

A potentially repetitive group trampling of those with opinions differing from the vast majority is allowed. But to me? Not a good idea in the long run.

Semi-rant over. Love y'all!

I was waiting for one of these posts yesterday when my character was being attacked but it never came from anyone with any authority.

Luckily others seem to have my back but it was probably more because he rubs everyone the wrong way but as the kids say

It is what it is 

Posted
No crime he asked a Mod to delete his account.   I’m guessing he will be back with another user name soon enough 

Ok thanks for clearing that up! I missed that part

 

Sent from my SM-A326U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

Posted

I've seen no opinion, only vague allusions to working in the administration.

No insight, only "consensus decision making" and "but my SEC BOT friends!..." 

Oh yeah, and a whole lot of speaking down to people, very plainly. 

I don't disagree about repetitive group stampedes on different opinions at all Stu...

As for an agenda, when you're admittedly part of the administration, everything you say is in defense of the BOT despite you claiming you're not here to criticize or defend, while offering no actual insight to back that up and then be dismissive to anybody trying to have an actual dialogue ... You know, about something substantive like how consensus decision making may lead to unilateral authority ... it's hard to take it for anything but an agenda. She's not sharing an opinion I disagree with she is positioning herself as an administration insider, then offering no actual perspective aside from telling you that you're wrong and know nothing re: what you're talking about. I don't see that kind of posting style bringing much value to the board. 

Give me a vacation if I'm being too much but I've got way less patience for that than anything NGW did 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...