Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
19 minutes ago, IUCrazy2 said:

Again, I think this is fishing for an answer you cannot or will not get.  I understand going the skeptics route until the ink is dry.  Totally get that.  This program has been a kick in the balls for 2 decades.

That being said, nothing these guys are going to be willing to give you is going to overcome your skepticism.  You'll just have to wait it out.

I was referring to things in the public sphere, not fishing for extra insider information.

Posted
22 minutes ago, Seawolf82 said:

My biggest fear is that the Celtics are putting together a counter offer, but the way their current season is going, I think it would be a hard sell to the fans.

If he wants to leave not much they can counter with:

Money? If he's leaving its not for more money, so more money wouldn't get him to stay.

(More) GM power? That hasn't worked out well for most dual coach/GMs historically

Ownership? Cool, but really just more money in the end

I think this is the least of our worries. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Maynard said:

I was referring to things in the public sphere, not fishing for extra insider information.

Yeah but that is just tea leaf reading.

I support your skepticism, I am usually in that category myself.  I just don't think we will have anything concrete until we see an official yes or no.

Posted
1 minute ago, raorIU said:

Is it collusion if you own a NBA team and fund the "buy out" of a competing team's coach? Just hypothetically ...

I don't think so.  That is essentially what the Celtics forced the Clippers to do in order to release Doc Rivers.  Danny made them cough up a first round pick in order to release Doc to sign with the team.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...