Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, AH1971 said:

The $100 bet I extended to you yesterday is still on the table.

Fine, I didn’t reply to it because I don’t want to cheer against any IU player. 50+ made 3’s during regular season? Is that the bet?

Posted
Just now, MikeRoberts said:

Fine, I didn’t reply to it because I don’t want to cheer against any IU player. 50+ made 3’s during regular season? Is that the bet?

Yessir

Posted
1 minute ago, Magisterium said:

Evidently so.

Yeah, glad we kept him.  He’s got great connections already in place. He switched his X profile pic when Dusty announced UM that led to the speculation.   It did seem odd but all signs point to good things for IU currently and going forward. 

Posted
43 minutes ago, Deserthoozier said:

Putting a cap in place would just revert back to teams that will/have aggressively cheated in the past to find ways around the new ‘rule’  - and pay over it, under the table. Not sure about your faith in the NCAA’s ability to enforce rules equitably, but mine is less than zero! The wild west is liberating to programs like IU…who have major fan bases and financial supporters—but didn’t have admins willing to do things under the table like most of the elite teams over the past 30 yrs. Wild West (free market) has at least provided us with an opportunity to swim in the same pool with some recruits, and maybe even be competitive. FYI .. it was never the drop ceilings! 
 

I get that free market ruins the purity of the game, wrecks continuity, potentially crushes mid-major long term competitiveness…but this is big business now, not idealistic amateurism. That still exists…just in non-revenue college sports!

Oh I understand where you’re coming from, but disagree. Just because some programs will cheat doesn’t mean you do away with rules.
Your main concern is already addressed— we have high NIL dollars that allows for us to compete at the top of the food chain in the portal. That doesn’t go away by putting a cap in place. Some will always cheat, break rules, but that’s the small minority and you don’t just do away with rules. What you do is develop a better enforcement mechanism.

Posted
1 hour ago, dwtaylor1055 said:

A cryptic tweet - two guards? Rice and Kanaan? Rice and Hickman? Kanaan and Hickman? My bet is he’s insinuating Rice and Hickman with Hick visiting today. 

 

we shall see!

IMG_5045.png

That is 2 of the best shooters to come through IU. That was posted for Hickman. He posted the statue of Isaiah (greatest point guard in program history) yesterday for Myles Rice. Adam knows what he’s doing!

Posted
4 minutes ago, BGVille Hoosierfan said:

That is 2 of the best shooters to come through IU. That was posted for Hickman. He posted the statue of Isaiah (greatest point guard in program history) yesterday for Myles Rice. Adam knows what he’s doing!

I’m here for it 

Posted
11 minutes ago, HoosierHoopster said:

Oh I understand where you’re coming from, but disagree. Just because some programs will cheat doesn’t mean you do away with rules.
Your main concern is already addressed— we have high NIL dollars that allows for us to compete at the top of the food chain in the portal. That doesn’t go away by putting a cap in place. Some will always cheat, break rules, but that’s the small minority and you don’t just do away with rules. What you do is develop a better enforcement mechanism.

Disagree strongly! Over the past 20-30 years, that small cheating ‘minority’ has solidly been the UK’s, Duke, Kansas (since forever), UNC, Arizona, Louisville..probably MSU in the B1G… and others that are continuously lauded as the true blue bloods with the top tier coaches. Strong argument to be made that having a really good cheating system in place has had more impact on winning than having an outstanding coach.
 

Open up no rule NIL and player transferability where everyone’s able to compete on a more level playing field-and surprise…all of a sudden there seems to be a great deal of parity as we’ve seen immediately in the past 2-3 years. Even some mid-major boats have been lifted. I get it’s out of control, creates mercenaries for hire chasing the top $$$, creates farm system of mid majors, compromises team/player continuity that we all historically have enjoyed. But, the second a ‘cap’ is instituted there’s going to be a meeting of Kansas boosters directly connected to Bill Self to determine how they can ‘help’ overcome any potential cap obstacles - just like they used when there was a very specific cap…$0! 
 

Someone mentioned above-likely move is to a model where players are employees and have formal contracts. Agree, and thats  fine - we just better be competitive in the process for determining how much to put on the table…and for finding ‘supplemental’ revenue streams..cause that’s where it jumps to - immediately. Or we can dwell in middle of the road…and keep pointing to the ole banners for another 40 years.

Posted
19 minutes ago, BGVille Hoosierfan said:

That is 2 of the best shooters to come through IU. That was posted for Hickman. He posted the statue of Isaiah (greatest point guard in program history) yesterday for Myles Rice. Adam knows what he’s doing!

So if the Isiah statue was posted for Rice, is this photo suggesting two MORE shooters?

Posted
3 hours ago, Golfman25 said:

It's expected but not guaranteed.  That's the problem.  

There are a few expectations:

1.  Players numbers improve as  they get older.  The biggest jump is from freshman to sophomore but there is a smaller jump from sophomore to junior.

2.  Someone going from a mid major conference would expect to see their numbers drop because of better competition.  The average defense rating of the MVC by KenPom would have been 13th in the Big Ten.

Basically you would expect Carlyle's numbers to increase and Conwell's to decrease.  If they do, the question is then by how much.  I am expecting that numbers in the end will be relatively close.  If that's the case, I want the guy who wants to be at Indiana more.

Posted
36 minutes ago, BGVille Hoosierfan said:

That is 2 of the best shooters to come through IU. That was posted for Hickman. He posted the statue of Isaiah (greatest point guard in program history) yesterday for Myles Rice. Adam knows what he’s doing!

Or he could be posting a picture of two players because of two commitments.

Posted
29 minutes ago, Deserthoozier said:

Disagree strongly! Over the past 20-30 years, that small cheating ‘minority’ has solidly been the UK’s, Duke, Kansas (since forever), UNC, Arizona, Louisville..probably MSU in the B1G… and others that are continuously lauded as the true blue bloods with the top tier coaches. Strong argument to be made that having a really good cheating system in place has had more impact on winning than having an outstanding coach.
 

Open up no rule NIL and player transferability where everyone’s able to compete on a more level playing field-and surprise…all of a sudden there seems to be a great deal of parity as we’ve seen immediately in the past 2-3 years. Even some mid-major boats have been lifted. I get it’s out of control, creates mercenaries for hire chasing the top $$$, creates farm system of mid majors, compromises team/player continuity that we all historically have enjoyed. But, the second a ‘cap’ is instituted there’s going to be a meeting of Kansas boosters directly connected to Bill Self to determine how they can ‘help’ overcome any potential cap obstacles - just like they used when there was a very specific cap…$0! 
 

Someone mentioned above-likely move is to a model where players are employees and have formal contracts. Agree, and thats  fine - we just better be competitive in the process for determining how much to put on the table…and for finding ‘supplemental’ revenue streams..cause that’s where it jumps to - immediately. Or we can dwell in middle of the road…and keep pointing to the ole banners for another 40 years.

Ok we can disagree. At one point above you say no rule NIL brings a level playing field - parity. It doesn’t it brings leverage to bigger programs with more money and will kill mid majors, and some majors who don’t have that NIL funding. That’s exactly why the NBA has a cap. The way around that is to exceed the cap and incur the tax penalty— but unlike what you’re talking about, which absolutely does not build parity, the cap in the NBA has multiple teams competing, just look at the playoffs right now.


There’s certainly different ways to address how to enforce the cap at the college level. The current NCAA, which may or not be a thing of the past sometime, is not it. But just assuming that the NCAA’s failures in the past reflect what would happen under a new enforcement mechanism is baseless 

Posted

The rules are you can pay players now. Iu who sucks but sells out assembly hall almost every game should be dropping top dollar to get top talent! Salvaging what's left of the diehard fans and getting new bandwagon fans should be immediately addressed. We have to compete at the highest level and the money will be returned in a big way. However if Woodson truly can't coach could be a huge waste lol. Have to try. Let's pay these guys and let's roll

Sent from my SM-A326U using Tapatalk

Posted
1 hour ago, Magisterium said:

fwiw it looks like UK may have lost another 7-footer to the portal? Gonna be interesting to see how many players follow Cal to Arkansas

They did and the one they lost could be a real unicorn.  Played half a season for them last year -- Croatian kid who didn't cleared by the NCAA until second semester.  Name is Zvonimir Ivisic.  Played in 15 games, averaged 12 mpg, 5.5 ppg, 3.3 rpg.  The unicorn part is he's 7'2" and not plays the post but can shoot as well -- made 6 of 16 threes in those 15 games last year and shot 77% from the line.  Shot blocker as well.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...