Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
This is also turning into a talent evaluation issue for the staff. Damezi and Jake are two guys in Miller’s first class who couldn’t find any way to contribute. How are we identifying Big Ten players?
Edit: talent evaluation AND development both

Don't give up on Damezi yet. As I remember, most people who had seen Jake in high school said he was a project who probably wouldn't play much as a freshman or sophomore. That doesn't mean he would have been worthless. We get 13 scholarships, so not all are going to contribute every year. His expectations may be different though, so he's free to leave and try to prove Archie wrong


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

Yep, he either fouled or got beat every time someone went at him.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

The game was too fast for him too. He missed a bunch of rebounds by just not reacting quickly enough or being strong enough. He tried hard, but that's about all he could do.

I know Fitzner was frustrating, but he at least knew what he was doing on the court, even if he got pushed around on defense. He had 3 years of college experience, so he was just more prepared. Jake was behind from a physical and mental standpoint this year.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
Good luck to Jake. He would be sitting 4th string here next year, maybe 5th, assuming Brunk comes. 
Brunk, Davis, TJD, and Race are all ahead of him on the depth chart. 
If Brunk does decide to come I could see him in the starting lineup. Would be a good weak side rebounder opposite of TJD. I think would be more dependable able to play started minutes over Davis.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

Posted
21 minutes ago, Kepner said:

This!! Seems that there are players that a lot on here want gone but now that a few of them have announced that they are in fact transferring it’s turned into bash Miller and the staff. A lot of people seem to be looking for reasons to complain

There is something that Miller said when he was hired that he may have wished he hadn't ventured from:  he stated when he was hired that he didn't know if he would ever use 13 scholarships, that it could be 10 or 11.  He said that it wasn't possible to keep 13 players happy.  Even with all the injuries we had, we had a walk on getting more time that some of the scholarship players and several scholly players never figured into the rotation.

Posted
This!! Seems that there are players that a lot on here want gone but now that a few of them have announced that they are in fact transferring it’s turned into bash Miller and the staff. A lot of people seem to be looking for reasons to complain
You are exactly right

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

Posted

I get Jake and his Pops frustration. So many times it seemed guys playing in front of him were either not productive (McBob, Evan, Race) or did not give effort (Smith). Even if you did not expect to play much, as the season unfolded and guys ahead of you struggled and yet you don’t see the court then you have to figure out why.

When he got in he seemed enthusiastic but lost. I think I would have played enthusiastic lost players vs uninspired players and would have been frustrated being a parent.

That being said, we don’t know what happened in practice, don’t know if he put in time on his own or did not follow the plan once in the game.

Not enough information for me to judge Archie or Jake. Wish him well and hope he finds a place where he can play a lot.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

Posted
And the class is not the movement. Get your head straight.

It’s almost comparable. We get a stud point guard(Rob and Yogi). A big guy that is playable(Thompson and Hanner). A wing that fizzles out(Anderson and Hollowell). A big that didn’t really even play(Forrester and Jurkin). And a guy that never even played at IU(Hunter and Patterson). Romeo is the outlier and it is debatable how much we ended up getting out of him outside of some good highlights and glimpses of what he can do on both ends of the court. This class didn’t have the hype around everyone, but the situations are comparable enough.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app
Posted
31 minutes ago, A.j. Nigh said:

I liked Jake and his energy and saw some potential as an upper class man but let’s be honest, we saw Jake for roughly 100 minutes (I admit I didn’t look it up).  Archie saw him 100 minutes every practice. You really think he purposely played a worse player over Jake?  Obviously Jake and Moore weren’t ready and Archie saw that in practice or they would have played.  

Truth. If guys couldnt get minutes with the injuries and lack of effort we saw this year then I wouldnt expect much moving forward.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...