HoosierAloha

How decent golfers make birdies @Josh 3' from the pin from ~65 yards out. Take that fart and put it back in your golf bag

That's cute. First birdie of the year? Can't hit a green in regulation? Still shot 90+ huh? Keep practicing before I venture down there and take your lunch money

Fun with numbers Purdoodoo 4 with most minutes shot 44% on 3.2 3PA in 21.1 MPG UConn 4 with most minutes shot 37.9% on 5.5 3PA in 31.4 MPG Tenessee 4 with most minutes shot 34% on 3.5 3PA in 29.2 MPG Iowa State 4 with most minutes shot 27% on 1.3 3PA in 23.4 MPG (note their starting 5 only played 22.5 MPG) NC State (probably closest example to IU) 4 with most minutes shot 30% on 1.7 3PA in 22.1 MPG (note their starting 5 only played 24.9 MPG) IU 4 with most minutes shot 33.3% on 1.4 3PA in 28.7 MPG (note their starting 5 played 32.2 MPG) Lack of guard play for IU definitely played into the lackluster season but the style of play contributed

Should we not mention a players class standing when discussing potential, development, and minutes they should see? Mentioning the presidents age? Let’s get back to reality here. Age and potential years left to (under)perform should be factors when deciding what to do with Woody. It’s not like he would be sent packing empty handed.

This thread is wild. Projection left, right, and center with some weird hypotheticals. You could fire Woody tomorrow because of his “age” and not worry about a lawsuit. One would hope our administration is factoring age along with results into any contracts but not much would surprise me with our administration. For those defending Woody, what has he done in his first three seasons that makes you optimistic he’ll overachieve or even just meet expectations in his fourth? Just having better talent? Having a player or two that will step up to lead? Reversing his downward trend of team defense? Finally playing through his guards instead of just talking about it?

There have been several coaches make fluke runs. Mike Davis, Tom Crean, Kevin Ollie, etc. all made runs in the tourney but I wouldn’t call any of them good coaches. If Woody was a decade or two younger, showed he was a good coach in the NBA, or overachieved his first few seasons I’d be interested to see what he could build at IU. However, his actions as the head coach at IU hasn’t really proven he’s anything more than just an okay coach outside of hanging that off-season banner each summer. It seems like there is some projection going on in this thread. The talent seems to have been upgraded but only time will tell. I am excited to see if changes have been made to the style of play. If we’re playing dumb basketball with a lack of e and e again there are always better things to do!

Why would I be pissed what the administration does or doesn’t do with Woody after the season? We actually win something for once under Woody (regular season, tourney, or NCAA) I’ll be stoked. We underachieve again? It’s Indiana, it’s Indiana. The sun will come up tomorrow. Those close to me and I are still in good health. Life is good. I’ve found other ways to give back to IU I feel much better about than $$$ to the basketball program.

There really seems to be two options. The first is to keep averages/decent coaches around and make excuses. The second would be to go after promising coaches and hold them to the IU standards of yesteryear. I’d rather have a few down years and find our winning coach for the next few decades rather than knowing the majority of the time our teams will underachieve.

Tremendous player, better announcer, and even better human. This world would be a much better place if there were more Bill Waltons in it One of my favorite announcers and definitely top 5 people I’d like to have dinner and a doobie with

Not sure why this season would be when the rubber meets the road. He’s going into his fourth year of coaching college ball and has underperformed his first three. If he meets expectations I’m not sure what would change about the first three. If he over performs while getting the talented pieces to play at a level greater than the individual pieces it would have me interested if he was 10-15 years younger. We’re playing not to lose with our coaching decisions instead of playing to win.

RIP Bill Walton I have little doubt he’ll be joining the real “Conference of Champions”

It's kind of amazing to see people living in a fantasy land divorced from reality. These message boards are fun but do people really get that upset over something that far out of your control? We have a bottom half, at best, coach in the Big Ten conference. I can't change that and it doesn't affect my life. I do enjoy laughing at our decades of incompetence and watching the mental gymnastics attempting to make our program (administration/coaches) more than what they are.

Are we now saying there wasn’t social media accounts that popped up defending Woody? That’s a conspiracy theory? Some really odd behavior in the “Fire Mike Woodson” thread.

I tend to agree with the NCAA tourney being a crap shoot. However, there is a massive difference in getting to the sweet 16 and competing and getting to the sweet 16 and looking like you have a **** coach. The same could be said for winning the regular season title. There is a wide range of possibilities. You could have an extremely favorable schedule with zero wins over teams competing for the championship and still win or could lose the title with an extremely difficult schedule and the winner having the previous scenario. We’re going into year four where we should have teams regularly competing for the top of the conference and NCAA tourney runs.

Not sure you can define a good vs bad season before the season plays out. We could have a decent record but get blown out against any legit competition again. We could finish second in the Big Ten but not really be close to competing for a conference championship again. The talent seems to be there for a high level and deep team to compete for championships. However, this wouldn’t be the first team that was supposed to be talented and deep but failed.