Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, CSP said:

man... Burton does NOT seem like a Houston type player, buuuuut.... since Sampson does want him, I absolutely want him. 

A pretty strong recruiting strategy. Kinda like a football coach going after any three star that gets offered by Cignetti, and then trying to outbid IU for the kid.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Hoosierfan2017 said:

Nothing we’ve seen from Devries suggests he’s a good enough coach to win with middling talent. We tried the mid major scrappy underdogs approach last year. It was a disaster. It will be very disappointing if we do the same or similar this year. 

to be fair, no coach is

Posted
4 minutes ago, Five Prime said:

We may very well end up with 2 or 3 off the top of our board, but we also have to understand how these transfers leverage school interest. Everyone knows we are desperate and will pay reasonably well, so agents garner IU interest and drive up the asking price. 

EXACTLY.  We are not in a good position by needing so many players.  That's why last year was a waste.  It isn't helping this year in the portal at all or to get top talent because we are going to have to overpay to do it and at this point we cannot afford to overpay when you need 7+ players.

Posted

Poster on X:  The following schools have been in contact with (fill in the blank).

1.  We did initiate a contact and were told the asking $$ and we immediately hung up,

2.  We did initiate a contact and were told the player had zero interest in IU or the B1G and we hung up.

3.  An agent, parent or other initiated a contact with us and we hung up for whatever reason.

4.  Agent, parent or other hinted/implied an IU contact when none really existed.

 

It's to the agent, parent or other's benefit to say, imply, hint that there's been mutual communication to keep interest/demand in the player at a higher level.  Not all reported IU/player contacts are necessarily equal.

 

 

 

Posted

Just to clarify, I think there is a big difference between these posts listing IU as one of 25 teams that have contacted a player, and reports from Jamie Shaw or Travis Branham saying IU is among the 3 or 4 teams to watch for a player. The latter may prove incorrect, but suggest a higher level of meaningful interest and engagement than the former.

Posted
11 minutes ago, skhoosier2 said:

EXACTLY.  We are not in a good position by needing so many players.  That's why last year was a waste.  It isn't helping this year in the portal at all or to get top talent because we are going to have to overpay to do it and at this point we cannot afford to overpay when you need 7+ players.

Some fans are working themselves up with worry and negative scenarios.   Main-stream media and social media get more attention and make lots more noise with shock and anger news and rumors.   I follow it for entertainment, but the smoke and mirrors do not trip my trigger until a signed agreement.

I, for one, am hopeful and looking forward to an interesting month and a seriously better basketball season.  I want a great point guard.   

 

Posted

God help this board if we lose an in-state kid at a position of need to Kelvin Sampson lol.

Wouldn't blame Burton for it though. Houston has been the better program over the course of his lifetime.

He's probably transferring from ND because he's a good player who's sick of losing. Will he get away from that at IU? 

Tough call.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...