Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, RaceToTheTop said:

To this point, no one that fits Goode's profile -- playing ten games in the second half of a season -- has been granted a redshirt.  Saying his chances are 'very high' is a false narrative.  Marcus Domask had a stronger case that Goode did and hired lawyers as well.  Didn't get an extra year.

Marcus did not have a stronger case.  He eclipsed 30 percent in that season. Luke did not. 

Posted
44 minutes ago, newcastle12 said:

Marcus did not have a stronger case.  He eclipsed 30 percent in that season. Luke did not. 

Domask’s games were in the first half of the year which is a criteria for the waiver.

Posted
29 minutes ago, RaceToTheTop said:

Domask’s games were in the first half of the year which is a criteria for the waiver.

Another criterion is that the number of games played must be 30% or less. He played 10 of 26 games which is 38%. 

The issue with Goode is when the games were played since he played 10 of 33 (30%). The argument is that it is arbitrary and unfair to allow someone who plays 10 games at the beginning of the season to get another year while someone who plays the games after the first 1/2 of the season to not get a waiver. That in and of itself would be hard to defend in court but it looks untenable when football is taken into account where they can play 4 games at any time and maintain eligibility.

I think Goode would have a very winnable case if it goes to court. I hope he does. I've always thought it was a stupid rule. We'll have to agree to disagree on this.

Posted
13 minutes ago, go iu bb said:

Another criterion is that the number of games played must be 30% or less. He played 10 of 26 games which is 38%. 

The issue with Goode is when the games were played since he played 10 of 33 (30%). The argument is that it is arbitrary and unfair to allow someone who plays 10 games at the beginning of the season to get another year while someone who plays the games after the first 1/2 of the season to not get a waiver. That in and of itself would be hard to defend in court but it looks untenable when football is taken into account where they can play 4 games at any time and maintain eligibility.

I think Goode would have a very winnable case in it goes to court. I hope he does. I've always thought it was a stupid rule. We'll have to agree to disagree on this.

To add on to my previous post: Another thing to keep in mind is that when these types of cases go to court, the athletes are actually arguing that the NCAA is hurting their livelihood by denying them eligibility in this way. So the NCAA is unfairly hurting their income with arbitrary and inconsistent rules like this. It doesn't go over well. For reference, see: the NCAA's recent court history

Posted
47 minutes ago, go iu bb said:

lol, he definitely reads this board.

Agreeing with him feels kind of gross. Or maybe I should say him agreeing with me. :)

I'd wager we've seen more than one iteration of Tyme on this board. Same goes for SDB. Those two love to interject themselves into every IUBB discussion and behave as if they are the preeminent authority on Indiana basketball. Even though both have gotten many things wrong in the past and just delete the old tweets and pretend it didn't happen. lol

Posted
3 minutes ago, JustWinBaby said:

I'd wager we've seen more than one iteration of Tyme on this board. Same goes for SDB. Those two love to interject themselves into every IUBB discussion and behave as if they are the preeminent authority on Indiana basketball. Even though both have gotten many things wrong in the past and just delete the old tweets and pretend it didn't happen. lol

 

jim-carrey.gif

Posted
18 minutes ago, Hovadipo said:

BRING ME CONWELL

Do we know if this is realistic? I think he would be number 2 or 3 on my overall wishlist but I know he had zero interest in our system last year. Is he an Indiana guy that would want to come to IU or is he just as likely to take a bag elsewhere?

Posted
2 minutes ago, JimmerNoe said:

Do we know if this is realistic? I think he would be number 2 or 3 on my overall wishlist but I know he had zero interest in our system last year. Is he an Indiana guy that would want to come to IU or is he just as likely to take a bag elsewhere?

If he doesn't follow Miller to Texas I would think very realistic. He's a Pike high school grad who has had back to back excellent years at Indiana State and Xavier. Haven't had a scoring 2 guard like him in years. 

Posted
Just now, JimmerNoe said:

Do we know if this is realistic? I think he would be number 2 or 3 on my overall wishlist but I know he had zero interest in our system last year. Is he an Indiana guy that would want to come to IU or is he just as likely to take a bag elsewhere?

He didn’t have 0 interest . The system was a concern but the bigger issue was IU (mainly Coach Ya) prioritizing Carlyle from the get go.  

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...