Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, JerryYeagley23 said:

Yeahhhhh, appreciate the intent, but specifics that get back to sources are how you lose sources. Can’t really go there my friend. I’ll say this, it’s a specially called meeting, not a standing appointment, and the big boys/girls will be at the table for this one. Is that fair?

By saying BP could be this cycles BS does that mean we would make him say no first, or does that mean isn’t going to happen?

Posted
I don't see how or why McNeeley would decide to come here to play for May. The guy is a projected lottery pick, it'd be way too risky for him. Pearl maybe, but even then I think it's a long shot. Liam suiting up in candy stripes may even be a long shot if we keep Woodson at this point, given everything he's said about wanting to win, potential departures, etc.
And just to be clear I wouldn't base any decision on a single recruit, or even a single recruiting class ('25, for instance).
Why would he play for Woodson unless he does not mind losing alot

Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk

Posted
A vote to remove Dan Dakich from our fanbase once and for all?
Just ignore him. I mean if you don't like him don't listen it's simple.

Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk

Posted
20 minutes ago, jbeaman9 said:

"2) There’s a meeting happening next Tuesday that will likely via leaks/smoke shed some light on the administration’s focus."

Focus as in retaining or letting go or focus as in which direction to pursue a replacement?

Ironically, that’s after these next two games.  Maybe the tea leaves are saying, if we lose these next two games, we’ll make a change, if we win, we stay the course.  

Posted
2 minutes ago, IUFAN1976 said:

Ironically, that’s after these next two games.  Maybe the tea leaves are saying, if we lose these next two games, we’ll make a change, if we win, we stay the course.  

Regardless of the next two games, staying the course looks like next year would be rough.

Posted
12 minutes ago, JSHoosier said:

Billy Donovan 

Well that makes sense and BS is Brad Steven’s and not Bullsh*t, lol.  See, for the elderly and learning impaired 

Posted
Just now, JSHoosier said:

Regardless of the next two games, staying the course looks like next year would be rough.

We all know that, but maybe they want to let Woodson carry out his portal plan, free agency, just to see if it will work.  I definitely just speculating, my tea leaves are dried up and dead!

Posted
1 minute ago, IUFAN1976 said:

Well that makes sense and BS is Brad Steven’s and not Bullsh*t, lol.  See, for the elderly and learning impaired 

That's the BS people will be saying if Woodson is brought back.

Posted
But he'll also get about 6 million to play with in NIL money
So more $ to field a roster of 13 than our football coach to field a roster of 85? Something is off here lol

Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...