Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

Hoosierfan1901

Proposed Men's Bball Rule Changes

Recommended Posts

Someone shared this on HSN so I thought I'd share it here. The Big East experimented with 6 fouls in the early 90s during league play. It resulted in a ton of FTs. A game that is already getting ugly would get uglier. 

thegraph

 

I would also point out that currently the NCAA allows players the same number minutes per foul as the NBA at 8 minutes per foul.

40/5 = 8

48/6 = 8

Adding a 6th foul would change that to 1 foul allowed every 6 minutes 40 seconds before fouling out. So instead of making the game more like the NBA, which the NCAA seems to be trying to do, in this aspect they'd be going away from that and making it more like HS ball.

Just the fact that they're trying to also limit it to 4 fouls per half shows that they realize it probably isn't a great idea to go to 6 fouls.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Hoosierfan2017 said:

Yeah I agree. I don't like the free throw proposal at all. It would make games way less entertaining. Making free throws is part of the game. All teams have to do is hit their free throws late in the game and they will likely win. 

The only chance for possession change is the winning team getting a 5 second violation when they run out of timeouts. Perhaps in the last 2 minutes, a non-shooting foul or a foul in the backcourt results in the team that got fouled being allowed to pick the shooter of players currently on the floor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If im making rules, it's getting 4 10-minute quarters and keeping the bonus at 7 fouls per quarter. Way less free throws. Way faster game. More flow created. Media timeouts at the under 5 mark, between quarters. 
Agree with everything but the 7 fouls. I would do 5 and eliminate the one and one.

Sent from my Pixel 3a XL using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, brumdog45 said:

Know what it also eliminates?  The buzzer beating, game winning shots.  Not sure I'm real excited about a 'game winning shot' by a player in an 80-56 game.

Yeah, it’s the one reason I’m not totally on board with it yet....eliminating the chance of a buzzer beater. But on the flip side, every single game would have a game winning shot.
 

As far as the 80-56 game, doesn’t matter how it ends...Elam ending, normal ending, the end to that game is not going to be exciting. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, NashvilleHoosier said:

Why?

It has the feel of a pickup game at the park where the next basket wins.  I am just tired of people trying to change things in basketball that doesn't need to be changed.  Also with a two hour time frame in the TV schedule this rule could make the games go longer than expected.  This sport had always been about time so why the need to fix something that is not broken.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, IU Scott said:

It has the feel of a pickup game at the park where the next basket wins.  I am just tired of people trying to change things in basketball that doesn't need to be changed.  Also with a two hour time frame in the TV schedule this rule could make the games go longer than expected.  This sport had always been about time so why the need to fix something that is not broken.

One of its very specific purposes is to address the fouling/free throw/drawn out end to games we often see now. I think the amount of times a game would last longer b/c of the Elam ending will be very rare. The amount of games that will last less time b/c of the Elam ending will be a lot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, NashvilleHoosier said:

One of its very specific purposes is to address the fouling/free throw/drawn out end to games we often see now. I think the amount of times a game would last longer b/c of the Elam ending will be very rare. The amount of games that will last less time b/c of the Elam ending will be a lot.

I hate that rule and would never want to see it in an organized game

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
One of its very specific purposes is to address the fouling/free throw/drawn out end to games we often see now. I think the amount of times a game would last longer b/c of the Elam ending will be very rare. The amount of games that will last less time b/c of the Elam ending will be a lot.

I love it. Players love it. It encourages offense. It discourages fouling. Endings are often exciting. I think it still needs tinkered to get the exact numbers right, but it’s on the right track.

 

Look up Mo Creeks games this past summer as some evidence. Coaches would learn to coach for this. It’s strategic, and although they aren’t buzzer beaters, every game ends on a winning shot or free throw. Players play extremely hard in Elam Ending.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no interest for the Elam ending.  Keep it in all-star games and TBT tournament but keep it far away from college basketball as possible.   Anything that would take away the magic of an ending that the UCLA/Zags game gave us is hard pass in book.  Luckily I will never have to worry about the Elam ending in college basketball.  I have a better chance at becoming ESPNs  full time bracketoligist then the Elam becoming a thing 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have no interest for the Elam ending.  Keep it in all-star games and TBT tournament but keep it far away from college basketball as possible.   Anything that would take away the magic of an ending that the UCLA/Zags game gave us is hard pass in book.  Luckily I will never have to worry about the Elam ending in college basketball.  I have a better chance at becoming ESPNs  full time bracketoligist then the Elam becoming a thing 

Couldn’t the Elam ending still occur absent having a stop in action for OT


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×