Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

With Cronin, he’s not a bad option, but he limits the ceiling this program can take IMO. We will consistently make the tournament, which is a huge improvement over where we are at now, but won’t have a lot of success in it. 
 

My worry with Cronin is we will be with him, most likely, for the next 15ish years and will have a couple Sweet 16s. Not enough to get him fired, so it all just depends on what Dolson wants and who is willing to take the job. 

Posted

I’d like to know why you heathens are not at church on this beautiful, Sunday morning. And if you ARE— why you’re on this board instead of listening to your preacher! :)

Posted
2 minutes ago, Uspshoosier said:

Nope.   do people that hate Tom Brady know him personally?   It’s not that deep.   I don’t like him therefore I don’t want him coaching the team I’m invested in 

People hate Tom Brady cause he won a lot. You seem to hate Wade on a personal level, mentioning his personality. That's why I ask. To each their own, I just don't get it

Posted
1 minute ago, RoadRage said:

I am not going to argue about the amount of people, but there are plenty of posts supporting him, hard to miss them actually?

I posted some of them, but my point was no one was arguing Cronin as popular choice, at least I didn't see that. I definitely wasn't, just that he was a decent option if we get that far down ballot and arguments against him were either personality based or that he had made too many tournaments without enough final fours which are both absurd given the state of our program (but as I said, i get the personality thing).

I do understand why someone would want a McCollum type over him (I certainly could be talked into it), but I do not think Dolson takes a risk like that. Cronin simply isn't risky if we cannot get someone at the top of the list. He's a safe and milquetoast option to get us back relevant. 

Anywho, heres hoping he is never actually considered and we do not get to that pool of candidates. Cheers.

Posted
1 hour ago, Certified Sunshine Pumper said:

He wins at Iowa State, big... in a good conference... 

Cronin sort does ok at UCLA? In an average B1G and bad P12... and was 3-6 in the tourney at Cinci? 

Age? Everything? 

Otz is 47 and Cronin is 53. The age gap isn’t huge. Otz is 4-5 in the NCAA tournament while Cronin is 15-14, including 8-3 at UCLA. Otz is winning 68.9% of his games and 57.1% of his conference games and ISU while Cronin is winning 68.7% and 69% of his conference games.

How does this equal Otz “winning big” but Cronin “sorta doing ok”? 

Posted
Just now, VFury said:

People hate Tom Brady cause he won a lot. You seem to hate Wade on a personal level, mentioning his personality. That's why I ask. To each their own, I just don't get it

Yeah I follow college basketball closely.  I pay attention to the whole sport not just IU so I watched him coach at VCU when he was a young coach.  As I said watching him turn into a villain in real time was something that turned me away from being a fan of his.   Nothing to get.  I once liked him as a coach and now I don’t 

Posted
2 minutes ago, VFury said:

People hate Tom Brady cause he won a lot. You seem to hate Wade on a personal level, mentioning his personality. That's why I ask. To each their own, I just don't get it

I’d take Wade. I’d take Sampson too. The rule Wade broke was actually illegal for the NCAA to even have in the first place. I actually like his cockiness and it’s needed at a place like IU imo. We can’t have some meek coach. We need someone who has a personality big enough for the job. This isn’t just an X’s and O’s job. It will take someone with a personality big enough to handle it all. Think Bruce Pearl, Wade, Oats, Stevens etc. 

Posted
37 minutes ago, 12345Brad said:

Agree. I’m hopeful it is still Stevens (the timing and dots connect in my desperate brain) … but I’m certain, if it is him, he most likely told Dolson he wants to work in his capacity as Celts GM through waiver deadline.  

When I hear stuff like this, my mind goes back to Wisconsin and Bob Knight... the deal was all but signed, but people in Madison could not keep their mouths shut, and Knight walked away. A year later he was in Bloomington and history was being made.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Hoosierfan2017 said:

Otz is 47 and Cronin is 53. The age gap isn’t huge. Otz is 4-5 in the NCAA tournament while Cronin is 15-14, including 8-3 at UCLA. Otz is winning 68.9% of his games and 57.1% of his conference games and ISU while Cronin is winning 68.7% and 69% of his conference games.

How does this equal Otz “winning big” but Cronin “sorta doing ok”? 

I haven't bought into many of the program arguments (like Cronin couldn't do better here because he's already been at UCLA), but I definitely think there could be one made here. ISU is infinitely harder to win and recruit than even this version of UCLA, and the Big12 has been much better than the Pac-12 for a while, IMO. Cronin could maintain or get better at IU, I do not think he could do what Otz is doing at ISU, thats the difference to me. 

Posted
9 minutes ago, JaybobHoosier said:

With Cronin, he’s not a bad option, but he limits the ceiling this program can take IMO. We will consistently make the tournament, which is a huge improvement over where we are at now, but won’t have a lot of success in it. 
 

My worry with Cronin is we will be with him, most likely, for the next 15ish years and will have a couple Sweet 16s. Not enough to get him fired, so it all just depends on what Dolson wants and who is willing to take the job. 

To me Cronin is a guy with strong NIL has us a top 4 seed regularly. Which means in the hunt for deep runs. After that it’s a crap shoot. But if the floor is making the tournament each year, challenging for the Big Ten annually, and then see how the tournament goes, I’m down for that. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, VFury said:

People hate Tom Brady cause he won a lot. You seem to hate Wade on a personal level, mentioning his personality. That's why I ask. To each their own, I just don't get it

Brady is hatable because

  1. He's a cheater
  2. Boston fans are the worst so it's easy to hate everything about him
  3. He always whined to the refs
  4. He got all the credit for teams successes

Not because he won a lot

Posted
4 minutes ago, OKHOOSIER said:

I haven't bought into many of the program arguments (like Cronin couldn't do better here because he's already been at UCLA), but I definitely think there could be one made here. ISU is infinitely harder to win and recruit than even this version of UCLA, and the Big12 has been much better than the Pac-12 for a while, IMO. Cronin could maintain or get better at IU, I do not think he could do what Otz is doing at ISU, thats the difference to me. 

I won’t pretend to be an ISU historian, but they were a solid program the decade before Otz got there. Between 2012 and 2019 they went to the tournament 7 of 8 years. Won the Big 12 conference tournament 4 times. ISU isn’t UCLA historically, but it’s not Siberia either. Not even saying that Cronin is the better candidate, just that I don’t understand why some view Otz as a grand slam while they view Cronin as a single at best. 

IMG_1951.thumb.png.c3855086684975fa549adcf4e613721e.png

Posted
6 minutes ago, Asha’man said:

To me Cronin is a guy with strong NIL has us a top 4 seed regularly. Which means in the hunt for deep runs. After that it’s a crap shoot. But if the floor is making the tournament each year, challenging for the Big Ten annually, and then see how the tournament goes, I’m down for that. 

That’s very possible, but I just have some hesitations about it coming to fruition. I know NIL has changed the game, but it can also only get you so far. Would we still lose out on Harrelson and Mullins if Cronin is at the helm…? I know it’s a lot of what ifs, but I feel like Cronin is a solid back up plan to the back up plan, to that back up plan. 
 

Here’s the thing. I wouldn’t be mad or upset with Cronin, I think he would do good here, I just think there are better options that we need to go through first. 

Posted
Just now, JaybobHoosier said:

Would we still lose out on Harrelson and Mullins if Cronin is at the helm…?

Probably not in my opinion. Last 4 year recruiting cycles at ucla he has brought a bunch of top 85 kids included multiple 5 stars.  I think Mullins would definitely be a Hoosier if he were coach last year 

Posted
Just now, Uspshoosier said:

Probably not in my opinion. Last 4 year recruiting cycles at ucla he has brought a bunch of top 85 kids included multiple 5 stars.  I think Mullins would definitely be a Hoosier if he were coach last year 

Thanks. I don’t keep up with recruiting like I used to, so wasn’t sure. 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...