realTomCrean Posted Tuesday at 05:16 PM Posted Tuesday at 05:16 PM 2 hours ago, Lebowski said: 2026 Week 1 takeaways. Minnesota might be a one loss team going into 812 on Halloween. UCLA might be a one loss team going into Minnesota 11/7. Michigan might not win 6 games. Penn State's schedule is very favorable for them. SC does not have a favorable schedule. Oregon is an unknown. O$U is a darn good football team. IUFB has to clean up a lot on the defense, in particular the run game. Overall the Big Ten didn't look that good and week 2 will tell us a lot more. O$U at Texas Oklahoma at Michigan ISU at Iowa Miss St at Minnesota Duke at Illinois Agree with all of your takeaways. Care to make an early prediction on Oregon v USC? Week 2 Prediction: OSU Oklahoma by -21 Iowa in a 10-0 game! Minnesota Duke/Illinois oof. Illinois looked so average and didn't watch any Duke. UK upsets Bama! Quote
Demo Posted Tuesday at 05:49 PM Posted Tuesday at 05:49 PM Utter genius. IYKYK Napleshoosier, Pagoda and RoadRage 3 Quote
Brass Cannon Posted Tuesday at 07:12 PM Posted Tuesday at 07:12 PM If they fix this it will do so much good for the view of integrity. It’s not like Michigan is winning anything this year BannerVille and RoadRage 2 Quote
Lebowski Posted Tuesday at 07:23 PM Posted Tuesday at 07:23 PM 1 hour ago, realTomCrean said: Agree with all of your takeaways. Care to make an early prediction on Oregon v USC? Week 2 Prediction: OSU Oklahoma by -21 Iowa in a 10-0 game! Minnesota Duke/Illinois oof. Illinois looked so average and didn't watch any Duke. UK upsets Bama! No predictions. I just know Oregon went undefeated in 2024 with a similar start against Boise State who ended up in the CFP that year. It's really hard to gage because a team the first two or three weeks is way different than a week 4 team. I just wonder if IUFB exposed some sort of Dante Moore kryptonite last year. realTomCrean 1 Quote
Stuhoo Posted Tuesday at 07:28 PM Posted Tuesday at 07:28 PM 14 minutes ago, Brass Cannon said: If they fix this it will do so much good for the view of integrity. It’s not like Michigan is winning anything this year So what is the language of the actual rule? Quote
Brass Cannon Posted Tuesday at 07:35 PM Posted Tuesday at 07:35 PM 5 minutes ago, Stuhoo said: So what is the language of the actual rule? I saw on a podcast somebody claiming that it’s always been to use the stadium clock probably to avoid any controversy like this. But don’t know if that’s official Quote
AKHoosier Posted Tuesday at 07:46 PM Posted Tuesday at 07:46 PM UM drops out of the AP Top 25 despite winning. How many times has that happened before? Quote
Brass Cannon Posted Tuesday at 07:54 PM Posted Tuesday at 07:54 PM 7 minutes ago, AKHoosier said: UM drops out of the AP Top 25 despite winning. How many times has that happened before? The voters know they didn’t win Quote
skhoosier2 Posted Tuesday at 07:56 PM Posted Tuesday at 07:56 PM I don't know if I believe it will be overturned. That opens the door for all kinds of challenges, but this is so nefarious that it is warranted imo. Good for the MAC for fighting back. The B1G is in the wrong and needs to be called out for such blatant idiocy. Voting UM out of the polls signifies everyone knows UM is 0-1. Quote
Brass Cannon Posted Tuesday at 08:04 PM Posted Tuesday at 08:04 PM go iu bb, LIHoosier and Stuhoo 3 Quote
LIHoosier Posted Tuesday at 08:05 PM Posted Tuesday at 08:05 PM Jim hasn't worked that hard since he was part of the bench mob haha Quote
AKHoosier Posted Tuesday at 08:06 PM Posted Tuesday at 08:06 PM 11 minutes ago, Brass Cannon said: The voters know they didn’t win EVERYONE knows they didn't win. skhoosier2 1 Quote
tyappleg Posted Tuesday at 08:12 PM Posted Tuesday at 08:12 PM 42 minutes ago, Stuhoo said: So what is the language of the actual rule? Taken from Reddit: So the question becomes if whatever clock used in the replay booth was available to NBC. Quote
Hardwood83 Posted Tuesday at 08:32 PM Posted Tuesday at 08:32 PM 59 minutes ago, Lebowski said: No predictions. I just know Oregon went undefeated in 2024 with a similar start against Boise State who ended up in the CFP that year. It's really hard to gage because a team the first two or three weeks is way different than a week 4 team. I just wonder if IUFB exposed some sort of Dante Moore kryptonite last year. I don't think it's just Moore. Oregon's scheme is pretty basic. They generally just hand the ball off and let their backs find a seam or throw to the flat/slants and let their players talent take over. It works 90% of the time...until they play teams of equal talent or far superior coaching/preparation (hello IU.) That is why the have to have elite talent to win and why they always come up short in the big game, they are easy to prepare for. Stein at pUKe is gonna find it tougher sledding for his PeeWee league level sophisticated offense, without Oregon's 32 5-Star difference makers. Thoughts? Stuhoo and skhoosier2 2 Quote
Stuhoo Posted Tuesday at 08:51 PM Posted Tuesday at 08:51 PM 18 minutes ago, Hardwood83 said: I don't think it's just Moore. Oregon's scheme is pretty basic. They generally just hand the ball off and let their backs find a seam or throw to the flat/slants and let their players talent take over. It works 90% of the time...until they play teams of equal talent or far superior coaching/preparation (hello IU.) That is why the have to have elite talent to win and why they always come up short in the big game, they are easy to prepare for. Stein at pUKe is gonna find it tougher sledding for his PeeWee league level sophisticated offense, without Oregon's 32 5-Star difference makers. Thoughts? Preach on brother. I'm not sure that's true, but I want it to be. Quote
jermhoosierfan Posted Tuesday at 09:02 PM Posted Tuesday at 09:02 PM https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/49869481/sec-files-amendment-authority-expel-lsu-conference In other news, the SEC amended their complaint against LSU, and they have a meeting scheduled on Thursday with University Presidents on the fate of LSU in the conference. go iu bb, skhoosier2, Artie86 and 1 other 4 Quote
str8baller Posted Tuesday at 09:53 PM Posted Tuesday at 09:53 PM 1 hour ago, Hardwood83 said: why they always come up short in the big game, they are easy to prepare for. Lanning has some pretty good wins on his resume, so I’m not sure this is true. Pagoda 1 Quote
AZ Hoosier Posted Tuesday at 11:47 PM Posted Tuesday at 11:47 PM https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/49871207/western-michigan-public-safety-department-joking-crime-log Hollywood Mike Miranda, Class of '66 Old Fart and ALASKA HOOSIER 2 1 Quote
skhoosier2 Posted Wednesday at 02:58 AM Posted Wednesday at 02:58 AM 5 hours ago, jermhoosierfan said: https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/49869481/sec-files-amendment-authority-expel-lsu-conference In other news, the SEC amended their complaint against LSU, and they have a meeting scheduled on Thursday with University Presidents on the fate of LSU in the conference. BookGame Tickets LSU just countered by adding 2 guys to their roster to make 105. Not the guys in the lawsuit. So I’m sure those two are going to sue LSU for damages and won’t it be ironic if during discovery all Lane’s collusion comes out. He really is disgraceful and bad for college football. go iu bb and AZ Hoosier 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.