Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
48 minutes ago, Uspshoosier said:

And decided to go elsewhere when Ballo committed or did you think he would of been fine in a reserve roll after starting for Minny last year?

I think a lot of people expected the money to solve the min issue. Or in other words, people thought we could pay starters/borderline starters enough to come off the bench and rotation guys to sit the bench in case we needed them situationally. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, str8baller said:

I think a lot of people expected the money to solve the min issue. Or in other words, people thought we could pay starters/borderline starters enough to come off the bench and rotation guys to sit the bench in case we needed them situationally. 

TAMU as big money, I'm told. 

Posted
1 minute ago, RaceToTheTop said:

If optimism gets you 0, why are you reading and posting in a thread about transfers?

Because I am interested in what the team will look like roster wise. And I have given Woodson credit for doing something in the portal not many teams have done.  I have also said I am cautiously optimistic. We have a roster of players who need to make some jumps.  I’m just holding out for actual results before I’m painting my face.  

Posted
4 minutes ago, str8baller said:

I think a lot of people expected the money to solve the min issue. Or in other words, people thought we could pay starters/borderline starters enough to come off the bench and rotation guys to sit the bench in case we needed them situationally. 

Not the real world.   Kids good enough to start are going to want to start especially at other Power 5 teams with money to burn as well 

Posted
5 minutes ago, str8baller said:

I think a lot of people expected the money to solve the min issue. Or in other words, people thought we could pay starters/borderline starters enough to come off the bench and rotation guys to sit the bench in case we needed them situationally. 

I think the number of guys transferring for the purpose of winning at all costs is pretty small.  Landing someone like Goode is a really nice piece if we do. The portal is weird thing where money isn’t the only thing, so I think getting guys willing to take these roles is going to be touch and go. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Uspshoosier said:

Not the real world.   Kids good enough to start are going to want to start especially at other Power 5 teams with money to burn as well 

Agree 100%. It’s still a sentiment I see fans express though. Sparks last year was probably in the minority and even he transferred back out once he got a taste of irregular mins off the bench. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Uspshoosier said:

Not the real world.   Kids good enough to start are going to want to start especially at other Power 5 teams with money to burn as well 

Also, kids are going to bet on themselves. As they should.

They believe if they get the opportunity to start/play a ton they will produce and make themselves a lot more money in the long run professionally (NBA or overseas). That makes more sense than taking a bigger paycheck to sit the bench. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, OKHOOSIER said:

I think the number of guys transferring for the purpose of winning at all costs is pretty small.  Landing someone like Goode is a really nice piece if we do. The portal is weird thing where money isn’t the only thing, so I think getting guys willing to take these roles is going to be touch and go. 

The thing with the 3rd perimeter shooter off the bench is you have to convince them they’ll play mins over 5th yr senior and former starter Galloway and 5* frosh Tucker OR get a commitment from the staff they’ll stagger the bigs a play small consistently, and often.   
 

If the kids have good advisors they’ll rightfully be skeptical of both. Because if you come here and neither of those things happen you’re suddenly and uncharacteristically riding the pine your last year of cbb in exchange for a few extra thousand dollars and the privilege of partying at Kilroys instead of some other B1G/SEC/ACC campus bar.  
 

Obviously guys like Hickman and Essigian heard the pitch and decided against it. If Goode bites that’s great, but I’m guessing he has some other nice options. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, str8baller said:

The thing with the 3rd perimeter shooter off the bench is you have to convince them they’ll play mins over 5th yr senior and former starter Galloway and 5* frosh Tucker OR get a commitment from the staff they’ll stagger the bigs a play small consistently, and often.   
 

If the kids have good advisors they’ll rightfully be skeptical of both. Because if you come here and neither of those things happen you’re suddenly and uncharacteristically riding the pine your last year of cbb in exchange for a few extra thousand dollars and the privilege of partying at Kilroys instead of some other B1G/SEC/ACC campus bar.  
 

Obviously guys like Hickman and Essigian heard the pitch and decided against it. If Goode bites that’s great, but I’m guessing he has some other nice options. 

I think there are no less than 15MPG, right now, on the table for Goode. 

Posted (edited)
56 minutes ago, btownqb said:

I think there are no less than 15MPG, right now, on the table for Goode. 

Based on what? That’s only viable if we play 3 guards consistently or one of our top 3 guards gets injured.

 

The previous post by str8baller nailed this IMO.

Edited by Juwan Moye
Posted
1 hour ago, Golfman25 said:

Because I am interested in what the team will look like roster wise. And I have given Woodson credit for doing something in the portal not many teams have done.  I have also said I am cautiously optimistic. We have a roster of players who need to make some jumps.  I’m just holding out for actual results before I’m painting my face.  

I will take you up on this. What will it take for you to paint your face?

Posted
17 minutes ago, Juwan Moye said:

Based on what? That’s only viable if we play 3 guards consistently or one of our top 3 guards gets injured.

 

The previous post by str8baller nailed this IMO.

Based on who we have, what's needed, and Luke's skill set. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...