Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Going to take this opportunity to remind everyone that Oregon chickened out of playing a football game in Bloomington in 2005 after we somehow beat them at their place the year before. Can't run away from IU football this time, Ducks! Lol. 

Posted
1 hour ago, TheWatShot said:

Going to take this opportunity to remind everyone that Oregon chickened out of playing a football game in Bloomington in 2005 after we somehow beat them at their place the year before. Can't run away from IU football this time, Ducks! Lol. 

Guess you're saying they can no longer duck us!

giphy.gif
 

Posted

The chances of Oregon and Washington coming to the B1G got much better today ... the Big 12 just announced the addition of Arizona and Arizona State... meaning that the Pac-12 is most likely toast, having only 4 members: Cal, Oregon State, Stanford and Washington State

Posted
41 minutes ago, AZ Hoosier said:

The chances of Oregon and Washington coming to the B1G got much better today ... the Big 12 just announced the addition of Arizona and Arizona State... meaning that the Pac-12 is most likely toast, having only 4 members: Cal, Oregon State, Stanford and Washington State

Oh, the chances are around 100%

Posted
41 minutes ago, AZ Hoosier said:

The chances of Oregon and Washington coming to the B1G got much better today ... the Big 12 just announced the addition of Arizona and Arizona State... meaning that the Pac-12 is most likely toast, having only 4 members: Cal, Oregon State, Stanford and Washington State

It's already a done deal and been reported all day. 

Posted
13 minutes ago, Hovadipo said:

IMG_3508.jpeg

16 hours ago, LIHoosier said:

If they're joining in 2024, does that mean we're going back to playing the O$U/Michigan/Penn St triumvirate in football again?

Here's a logo that'll be obsolete in 18-24 hours.

mb_mg_bigten_01.thumb.jpg.f078143db5e08f2c54e34c2b2a25ae2e.jpg

Really Hova?  We gotta have this on every page of this thread?

Posted

In hoops, a 20 game schedule with 18 teams means you’ll play everybody else at least once — there’s 17 games — plus 3 double-plays every year.

I did a little back-of-the-envelope brainstorming of how to arrange that in hoops if you keep 3 protected rivalry doubles per team. I didn’t worry much about schedule strength, but tried to protect the best rivalries. Here’s a shot:

Team Primary Secondary Tertiary
USC UCLA Oregon Washington
UCLA USC Washington Oregon
Washington Oregon USC UCLA
Oregon Washington  UCLA USC
Rutgers PSU Maryland Northwestern 
PSU Maryland Rutgers OSU
Maryland Rutgers PSU Northwestern 
Nebraska Iowa Minnesota  Wisconsin 
Minnesota  Wisconsin Iowa Nebraska
Wisconsin  Minnesota  Iowa Nebraska
Iowa Nebraska Minnesota Wisconsin
Northwestern  Illinois Rutgers Maryland
Purdue Indiana Illinois MSU
Indiana Purdue Illinois Michigan
Illinois Northwestern Indiana Purdue
Michigan MSU OSU Indiana
MSU Michigan OSU Purdue
OSU Michigan MSU PSU


You can quibble with who’s left out in a few cases. I feel confident the ex-PAC teams should double-play each other. NW is a strange fit geographically with Rutgers and Maryland but if everyone has 3 protected double-plays, it has to work out somehow. The alternative is fewer protected ones, e.g. IU always double-plays PU but rotates the other doubles every year.

The teams with stronger B1G roots and hoops tradition end up with too few doubles — IU/OSU should probably be protected, for example, or Illinois/Wisconsin.

This exercise basically convinced me teams should just have the main rivalry protected, and the “primary” column above probably isn’t exactly right if you’re doing it that way. I would guess the PAC teams might stay west more than truly rotating unprotected doubles?

One final thought: conference tournament likely becomes 14 byes, with 15/18 and 16/17 “play-in” games to play seeds 1 and 2 in a 16 team tournament. So it’s an extra game for the top four seeds. I wondered if that would change the schedule but you actually don’t add a game to more than a couple schedules. The issue there: do you have eight games Thursday?? If so I think you’d need two gyms.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Alford Bailey said:

Any truth to the rumors about the B1G going after Clemson and Florida St as well?

No inside info but IMO Notre Dame, UNC, UVa and Stanford make the most sense, in that order.

Posted
1 hour ago, woodenshoemanHoosierfan said:

 

 


Agree

Sent from my SM-S908U using Tapatalk
 

 

It's definitely more travel but them acting like the conference was all close together isn't really accurate. UofA to UofW, for example, is a 24 hour drive so flights and likely at least 1 overnight stay would be required for that. 

That said, it seems as though there was ~0% consideration to the athletes given by the conference and schools. At least we no longer have to listen to them spew crap about how "amateurs" can't get paid.

Posted
On 8/5/2023 at 8:31 AM, Demo said:

Yup

That’ll be annoying…especially as I age. Lol…

 

On the other hand, Saturday late night college football is kind of cool. And if you’re an insane basketball junkie having basically 3 conf games every night—7, 9, and 11pm—will be fun at times. I would’ve loved it when I was in college.

Posted

When colleges shift conferences and leagues realign, new rivalries always develop. 

I'm guessing a few years down the road, Rutgers-Oregon basketball and football contests will be must-see TV. 

When the Scarlet Knights and Ducks hook up -- fuggeddaboutit! 

 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...