Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
I know this is what college sports is about today but it makes me sick to my stomach. It just seems so wrong to me that college sports is about the college that has the best NIL.

It’s always been about which schools have the most to offer either financially or otherwise. The transfer portal without penalty is the much bigger change to the landscape. NIL is just fine. The rich get richer with or without NIL. Always pretty much worked this way.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app
Posted
38 minutes ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:


This is a head in the sand moment. Players have been getting perks, cars, bags of cash, since time eternal. When scouting services started doing top 100 rankings and 5 star rankings it made things even worse because there became an unofficial-official market value to the talent. This goes back to UCLA and Wooden and likely even before. Certain recruitments were very obvious.

Also, players aren’t picking schools 100% on NIL but the money is a huge part of it. And it always has been for the top rated players.
Top Players want 1. chance at making NBA. 2. Most want Winning teams 3. featured roles and then the money. But in what world would a player or person not want all those things if they are available.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app

I’m one of a running from my hometown who had scholarship offers to both IU and Ohio State in the mid ‘70s that went to IU because his parents had a lot of medical bills run up and the doctor said he would wipe them out if he went to IU.  This is a crummy football program 50 years ago…..this has always been going on in different firms, just less money.

Posted

I was just wondering if the big time donors will have to choose to donate money for facilities or NIL. Even for the ultra rich you have to think there is a limit they would want to donate. Wonder if it is more important to donate money for the NIL to help get players. The problem is if your facilities are lacking then you don't get the top players.

Posted
Just now, Hoosierfan1901 said:

The visit, I usually indicate that Jersey pictures means it’s done 

I have no idea but isn't official visits usually 48 hours

Posted
1 hour ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:


It’s always been about which schools have the most to offer either financially or otherwise. The transfer portal without penalty is the much bigger change to the landscape. NIL is just fine. The rich get richer with or without NIL. Always pretty much worked this way.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app

No it’s not.  It needs to be more regulated instead of being a free for all.  Also, I think it needs to come out of the school’s athletic money.  Being fine it is not!

Posted
No it’s not.  It needs to be more regulated instead of being a free for all.  Also, I think it needs to come out of the school’s athletic money.  Being fine it is not!

Good luck regulating it (that will only set the bar to where cheating and extra perks come from). Free market will set its value.

 

As Indiana fans we should rejoice to see we can kinda level the playing field a little bit. As far as where the money comes from, school or otherwise that’s a slippery slope regarding non power 5s and even the power 5s. Schools will figure it out. We just need to be at the forefront of a movement instead of complaining, not embracing, and falling way behind what it takes to win in the landscape we live in.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app

Posted
1 hour ago, Ngw7183 said:

I just don’t understand why people ok with coaches making $5 million and colleges pocketing $100s of millions while raising tuition to crazy prices but this is what breaks them. Doesn’t seem logical to me but everyone has their choice. Not changing though. 

For the record, I'm not ok with any of it. And the constant turnover in personnel has diminished my interest in the sport. It's hard to get too invested in players knowing that they may not be on the team very long.

Posted
10 hours ago, Ngw7183 said:

If that was it, very, very short. Only mom too.

next - this is IUs to lose. (No, that doesn’t make it a lock and yes, my opinion) 

That photo shoot is painful to look at. There’s no emotion and the quality of the photos looks like a Polaroid was used…lol Here’s to IU closing the deal!

Posted
1 hour ago, Ngw7183 said:

Sure, few market but that sounds a little like the guys saying they were done watching NFL, or done with this or that. Doesn’t tend to last. But if people do, it will change. I just don’t understand why people ok with coaches making $5 million and colleges pocketing $100s of millions while raising tuition to crazy prices but this is what breaks them. Doesn’t seem logical to me but everyone has their choice. Not changing though. 
 

On Mgbako, NIL just changes it all. Arkansas, Alabama, Tenn. etc have been killing the portal, NIL and general money has changed it for them. I feel we can offer same NiL as Kansas and more playing time.  Seems simple to me. Will find out in another week or so. 

I don’t think it’s that straightforward in terms of Mgbanko’s decision.  I don’t know exactly what he wants, only that it involves something that Duke couldn’t offer.

Posted
2 hours ago, cthomas said:

For the record, I'm not ok with any of it. And the constant turnover in personnel has diminished my interest in the sport. It's hard to get too invested in players knowing that they may not be on the team very long.

Same thing has downgraded the NBA (imo). From once about following teams it’s now more about following players, and who teams up with who. Don’t get me wrong I still watch the NBA, the level of basketball, ability and athleticism is like nothing else, but it’s just not the same. 


Re the college game, it’s good to see the scales balanced, parity is now on another level, and competing against the cheaters just got a lot easier. But the flip side has lots of warts.Team building now a lot less about development (which i enjoy), recruiting now disfavors the high school players, guys you like will routinely leave for cha ching or more immediate playing time or other reasons, the “team” is now going to often be a bunch of different guys every yesr — they wear the jersey so they’re our college guys? Ok.
Pluses and minuses for sure, not discounting the plusses, but my interest level is down at this point 

Posted
14 hours ago, Ngw7183 said:

We slightly disagree on this.

I honestly believe St John’s does not have the money to compete here. This will take combined collective funds and outside deals. They have little of either in comparison to IU and Kansas. Now…. If an Arkansas, Alabama type get involved.. that is an issue. Unless he is truly all in on Adidas money and in that case, St John’s is still a no. 
 

I think this was Louisville to lose and they messed up. He added IU and Kansas because if that. They still have a legit shot but not a favorite. IU checks every box. Will be a longer recruitment.

St. John's has more money than we think. Mike Repole a billionaire who founded vitamin water said he would give lots of money if they hired Pitino. Some have said he has donated 100 million to their NIL funds to get it started. But every school has money. Hopefully Adidas pushed him one way or another. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...