Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, Jet812 said:

He’s no less of a troll than Isaac, playing games with these AI pics, not coming back to clarify when people question it.  His intentions may be different but he’s doing the same thing…

Most of the "insiders" love the attention and the likes they receive.  Nothing more, nothing less.  Why would anyone with inside information post it on a message board?  They love feeling important and love how everyone holds on to their every word or post.  

Posted
I’ve been vocal about not wanting Brownell, as have most, but if he makes at least the Sweet16 this year, doesn’t that soften your stance on him a little or won’t change? Piggyback, if he makes an Elite 8 or Final 4, does that help? 
No it won't change he has made the tourney 30% of the time at Clemson. That's awful.

Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk

Posted
Most of the "insiders" love the attention and the likes they receive.  Nothing more, nothing less.  Why would anyone with inside information post it on a message board?  They love feeling important and love how everyone holds on to their every word or post.  
And most are always wrong in the end like four years ago.

Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk

Posted
Just now, Home Jersey said:

You found internet in the Vietcong tunnels? Did your national journalist friend give you a hotspot to talk contract details? 

What?

Posted
3 minutes ago, JaybobHoosier said:

I’ve been vocal about not wanting Brownell, as have most, but if he makes at least the Sweet16 this year, doesn’t that soften your stance on him a little or won’t change? Piggyback, if he makes an Elite 8 or Final 4, does that help? 

no. "Sweet 16" is winning 2 games. One of those probably being Purdue. Why is that impressive? 

Posted
2 minutes ago, RoadToZion said:

I am not a troll. I just don’t have time to be on here 24/7. Get a job.

If you can type this response you can type one to clear up what your image intends to convey, unless it’s intended to be ambiguous, in which case I’d consider it trolling.

Posted
2 minutes ago, IUBtown said:

People using it as an excuse for Steven's.  All the made up stuff is for Steven's.  In reality there's been leaks mentioning names and likely one of those will be named.  There's no elaborate scheme just a normal coaching search.  

Occam's razor says this is the correct answer, of course. 

I think the naming of Woodson last time has people extra nervous. He was such a stupid hire that people are naturally a little gun-shy this time around...

Posted
1 minute ago, IUwins0708 said:

I’ve never seen a board spin out of control so damn quick like this one does!  Jesus Lol

Types of posters:

1) people who believe everything they read that matches what they want. 

2) people who believe everything that goes against the grain,  simply the other side of the coin to 1.

3) cynical people like me who think the sweet meteor of death is likely around the corner so don’t believe anything on a forum

Mix them up and watch it go.

 

Posted
6 minutes ago, ib4iu said:

I still just don’t understand the whole rumored NDA/everyone getting told to shut up for a McCollum type name. Seems like Dolson put all his eggs in the Stevens, Donovan, Pearl, or similar level name basket. This is playing out eerily similar to 4 years ago. 

Scott tried.  He missed...again.

baseball-fail.gif

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...