Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
No... Gallo is a wonderful 3. He shouldn't, and he needs to be recruited over for playing the 1 or 2. Getting Johnson back and getting Love would help that. You'd have Cupps and Gunn that can help at the 1 and 2. Gallo gets minutes at the 3 where he belongs.
I agree here. I think Galloway is much more suited for the 3 spot rather than the secondary ball handler.

Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk

Posted
28 minutes ago, Demo said:

Received a Ball St offer. From my admittedly single viewing of him, that sounds about right. 

could follow same route as Sparks.  One to two years at Ball State equivalent school then make a P5 jump 

Posted
1 minute ago, dwtaylor1055 said:

could follow same route as Sparks.  One to two years at Ball State equivalent school then make a P5 jump 

...not trying to knock Ball St. or others of the like, but it's similar to going the JUCO route until a big school notices you. JMO

Posted
43 minutes ago, rcs29 said:

I agree here. I think Galloway is much more suited for the 3 spot rather than the secondary ball handler.

Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
 

I would agree with this as well. Not sure I want him to be our starting 3 but a backup playing the 2 and 3 would be nice 

Posted
1 hour ago, Class of '66 Old Fart said:

Stop speculating on Doughty.   Not in the cards.

I only put his name out after hearing it mentioned on here.
 

No, I really DON’T think that he’d be someone our staff would/should pursue. Just was trying to get a feel from the board on how many would want to go the route of “developing” a guy with the last scholarship - typically a guy that’s not going to play much. 
 

You do realize speculate means “form a theory or conjecture about a subject without firm evidence”, right? I have NO idea if the staff would even entertain the thought of looking a the kid. But a discussion on it isn’t allowed? Geez . . .

Posted
10 minutes ago, Tasmanian Devil said:

I only put his name out after hearing it mentioned on here.
 

No, I really DON’T think that he’d be someone our staff would/should pursue. Just was trying to get a feel from the board on how many would want to go the route of “developing” a guy with the last scholarship - typically a guy that’s not going to play much. 
 

You do realize speculate means “form a theory or conjecture about a subject without firm evidence”, right? I have NO idea if the staff would even entertain the thought of looking a the kid. But a discussion on it isn’t allowed? Geez . . .

Easy friend!

It’s because after his name was put out there iit has been independently verified that Indiana is not pursuing him as a scholarship player.

Posted
Just now, Stuhoo said:

Easy friend!

It’s because after his name was put out there iit has been independently verified that Indiana is not pursuing him as a scholarship

My intent wasn’t that we SHOULD go after the guy. I agree Ball State (or that level) is a better fit for him .

I was only trying to start a conversation about HOW we should develop a roster - especially when it comes to utilizing the last scholarship. I was trying to get a feel from the board on IF we should fill those spots from the portal OR if we should look to develop guys in-house.

This is a message board. Isn’t it a place to discuss how we feel about how we operate as a program?

Posted
6 minutes ago, Class of '66 Old Fart said:

Mind your manners you young whippersnapper.  Purpose was to not see this thread start to evolve into multiple pages talking about a kid that's not on the IU radar.  Geez yourself.

No name calling-- You,...you....YOOOOUUUUU!!   ;)

It's all good guys.

Let's move on and keep discussing the transfer portal.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Class of '66 Old Fart said:

Mind your manners you young whippersnapper.  Purpose was to not see this thread start to evolve into multiple pages talking about a kid that's not on the IU radar.  Geez yourself.

Hey, if you want to tell me “please, let’s not let the discussion in this thread go off the rails”, I’m fine with that.

But there’s absolutely NO REASON to be a jerk about it. And, no, this is my last post on the subject in this thread; I don’t want to deliberately derail a topic. Just as I would never want to deliberately do/say something offensive to someone - especially over a message board discussion.

 

Posted

According to a few other sites seems like the shedrick call went very well (dont they all?) but as much so that the poster commented “he very well may be next”. And then on another site ledlum is getting some love. Speaking of love sounds like us missouri (hometown) and memphis?

Posted
8 minutes ago, Hoosierfanyuh said:

According to a few other sites seems like the shedrick call went very well (dont they all?) but as much so that the poster commented “he very well may be next”. And then on another site ledlum is getting some love. Speaking of love sounds like us missouri (hometown) and memphis?

Alabama is in on Love too. We had all coaches on zoom, and yes all visits usually go great. Ledlum is not committing till after he visits next weekend. We get a week to catch our breath

Posted
4 minutes ago, Chris007 said:

Alabama is in on Love too. We had all coaches on zoom, and yes all visits usually go great. Ledlum is not committing till after he visits next weekend. We get a week to catch our breath

What do you think our chances are with Love - or is it too early to tell?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...