Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, mookied39 said:

Honestly, who cares what Justin wants.....if he earns a starting spot....GREAT, if not TOO BAD!  Get better.  I hate the idea of being recruited over, if that is a problem, WORK YOUR ARSE off and CLAIM YOUR SPOT....if not...get out of the way.

I agree. Unfortunately a kid usually transfers if that happens in todays era. 

Posted
Honestly, who cares what Justin wants.....if he earns a starting spot....GREAT, if not TOO BAD!  Get better.  I hate the idea of being recruited over, if that is a problem, WORK YOUR ARSE off and CLAIM YOUR SPOT....if not...get out of the way.

Pretty much how life works right? If you really want something then you gotta put in the work. It’s really not that hard


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app
Posted
If Brunk and Davis can both average about 8 ppg at around 20 minutes each game with good rebounding and great defense we’ll be in a better place.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

Davis has the potential to score more than 8ppg. If healthy I’m looking for 12-14. He’s a load within 5 feet


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app
Posted

Davis has the potential to score more than 8ppg. If healthy I’m looking for 12-14. He’s a load within 5 feet


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

I agree mostly. I think if he stays healthy AND stays out of foul trouble he could for sure. I think him and Brunk sort of become our two headed monster in that position. I feel if both together could get to that 14-16 ppg and 10 boards in 40 min between them it’s a win.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app
Posted

I agree mostly. I think if he stays healthy AND stays out of foul trouble he could for sure. I think him and Brunk sort of become our two headed monster in that position. I feel if both together could get to that 14-16 ppg and 10 boards in 40 min between them it’s a win.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Exactly where I’m at with the stats. Although, I have a feeling we’ll see some of Jackson-Davis at the 5 too. If Davis is healthy AND conditioned (limiting his fatigued fouls) he could easily be a double figure scorer. Getting a double double from the 5 spot with great defense will be key.

If Davis is conditioned we could also see him average a couple assists per game which would be huge. Our shooting percentage would be much higher if Davis forces opponents to double him.

I have a bad feeling the staff is going to try and force a square peg in a round hole with Jackson-Davis playing the 4. I don’t think he’s quick enough to defend most Big Ten 4s nor has the perimeter game, yet(!), to keep teams honest.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app
Posted

I'm very interested to see what Archie's thinking on lineups next year, because right now we've got 5 big men (Race, TJD, Smith, Davis, Brunk) who are expecting playing time and offer no/limited threat from the outside. That's going to lead to the same types of offensive problems as we had this year. Good teams do not have 2 post players who can only score on the block

Hopefully Race and Smith are improving their mechanics and putting up tons of 3s during the off-season. Even TJD is going to need to add that at some point. That seems like the only way that all of these guys are going to be able to get on the floor


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
35 minutes ago, Free Jurkin! said:

I'm very interested to see what Archie's thinking on lineups next year, because right now we've got 5 big men (Race, TJD, Smith, Davis, Brunk) who are expecting playing time and offer no/limited threat from the outside. That's going to lead to the same types of offensive problems as we had this year. Good teams do not have 2 post players who can only score on the block

Hopefully Race and Smith are improving their mechanics and putting up tons of 3s during the off-season. Even TJD is going to need to add that at some point. That seems like the only way that all of these guys are going to be able to get on the floor


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'd argue we have 4.   Smith is really a 3 and much better in the open floor.    I'd like to see him in the high post/FT line; but I wouldn't consider him a big.  Davis is capable of 15-20 minutes tops; Thompson is still just 6'8".    I think there are plenty of minutes to go around.  

Not sure I agree with your comment that good teams don't have 2 players who can only score on the block.  Purdue was pretty good and they had 2-3 guys who fit that description.   (Every kid can make a 10-15 foot jumper, so it's a gray-area argument, anyway)   

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...