Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

ccgeneral

(2018) SG Romeo Langford - INDIANA HOOSIERS

Recommended Posts

Yeah, I didn't really see that article as some sort of hit piece or attempt to make it sound like something nefarious happened.  They even included a quote from Pitino that "this is legal too".  I don't think it's surprising to the people that follow college ball, but more informational for those that don't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, JSHoosier said:

Yeah, I didn't really see that article as some sort of hit piece or attempt to make it sound like something nefarious happened.  They even included a quote from Pitino that "this is legal too".  I don't think it's surprising to the people that follow college ball, but more informational for those that don't.

I don't see it as a hit piece, i see it as a big load of nothing, that they are trying to make ultra casual fans think is nefarious, rare, unexpected and unheard of. 

My Kentucky friend texted me today about Indiana sweating it  for a while, because adidas paid Romeo's dad so he'd go to Indiana.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is, even the most diehard, educated fans probably didn't read the whole article (I know I didn't; that thing was loooonngggg). I know it got plenty of traction on social media and I noticed a handful of comments along the lines of "I knew it! I knew they cheated to get Langford!" That's what makes an article like this so annoying.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, TheWatShot said:

The problem is, even the most diehard, educated fans probably didn't read the whole article (I know I didn't; that thing was loooonngggg). I know it got plenty of traction on social media and I noticed a handful of comments along the lines of "I knew it! I knew they cheated to get Langford!" That's what makes an article like this so annoying.

True.  Not only are several key quotes ignored (about it being legal. the Langfords approaching the recruitment totally above board, and no evidence that Tim pocketed excess money) - but you have a lot of people then reading into it what they hope and making massive jumps in logic (and presenting it as fact).  Mostly the later by jealous opposing fanbases.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, pumpfake said:

True.  Not only are several key quotes ignored (about it being legal. the Langfords approaching the recruitment totally above board, and no evidence that Tim pocketed excess money) - but you have a lot of people then reading into it what they hope and making massive jumps in logic (and presenting it as fact).  Mostly the later by jealous opposing fanbases.

It didn't ignore the quote about being legal, that is in the article.  Fans of opposing teams may, but nothing the journalist can do about that.

All the article is doing is shedding a light on something that happens in recruiting.  Some here are reading way too much into it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, TheWatShot said:

The problem is, even the most diehard, educated fans probably didn't read the whole article (I know I didn't; that thing was loooonngggg). I know it got plenty of traction on social media and I noticed a handful of comments along the lines of "I knew it! I knew they cheated to get Langford!" That's what makes an article like this so annoying.

That's my main problem....you look at the headline alone:  "Before this hoops recruit chose Indiana, Adidas made sure he stayed under its tent" reads as if Adidas was steering him toward Indiana, which isn't the case.  Adidas certainly wanted him to go to an Adidas school....there are 102 of them in Division 1 basketball.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, brumdog45 said:

That's my main problem....you look at the headline alone:  "Before this hoops recruit chose Indiana, Adidas made sure he stayed under its tent" reads as if Adidas was steering him toward Indiana, which isn't the case.  Adidas certainly wanted him to go to an Adidas school....there are 102 of them in Division 1 basketball.  

The headline says exactly that - Romeo chose Indiana, but Adidas made sure he stayed within Adidas. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Walking Boot of Doom said:

The headline says exactly that - Romeo chose Indiana, but Adidas made sure he stayed within Adidas. 

But why mention Indiana and then run a big pic underneath it of him with an Indiana hat?

i think we are just going to have to agree to disagree.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
But why mention Indiana and then run a big pic underneath it of him with an Indiana hat?
i think we are just going to have to agree to disagree.

Because that was the point of the article? Adidas made sure he went to an Adidas school? We knew about Adidas doing this for over a year. Maybe closer to two. It was known Tim Langford was shopping his AAU team. It’s legal. I don’t blame him. I have never filed for bankruptcy, but if I did and I could do something not illegal (assuming he filed his taxes accordingly) I would. I don’t give a rats @$$ how people interpret it. That’s on them if they believe their team hasn’t or wouldn’t do this. He took money for his family to stay with Adidas. His dad pocketed $50-$75k easy. Until they close up the loophole there is nothing wrong with it.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, rcs29 said:

Assume he didn't want to take Al or Cliff's jersey #. We all know he could have had either one if he wanted to take it

Sent from my Pixel XL using BtownBanners mobile app
 

I doubt Archie would allow that to happen. Not how you treat upperclassmen. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I doubt Archie would allow that to happen. Not how you treat upperclassmen. 
There's been precedent. Maybe not with Archie but plenty of others. You seriously think if Romeo said he wanted a particular # that he'd tell him no? Maybe but I'm doubting it.

Sent from my Pixel XL using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, rcs29 said:

There's been precedent. Maybe not with Archie but plenty of others. You seriously think if Romeo said he wanted a particular # that he'd tell him no? Maybe but I'm doubting it.

Sent from my Pixel XL using BtownBanners mobile app
 

Romeo probably realized that it'd be douchey to come in and take someone else's number. It would've started things off on the wrong foot. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, rcs29 said:

There's been precedent. Maybe not with Archie but plenty of others. You seriously think if Romeo said he wanted a particular # that he'd tell him no? Maybe but I'm doubting it.

Sent from my Pixel XL using BtownBanners mobile app
 

I'm telling you that I highly doubt it's an option. It's just simply not how you do things. No one comes before the team. That's something Mike Davis would allow Bracey Wright to do. You think Nick Saban let's FR come in and tell him what number they're going to be.. lol no

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm telling you that I highly doubt it's an option. It's just simply not how you do things. No one comes before the team. That's something Mike Davis would allow Bracey Wright to do. You think Nick Saban let's FR come in and tell him what number they're going to be.. lol no
Maurice Creek took Matt Roth's # and he was nowhere near the same talent as Romeo. It really doesn't matter and not worth discussion beyond what has already transpired.

Sent from my Pixel XL using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, rcs29 said:

Maurice Creek took Matt Roth's # and he was nowhere near the same talent as Romeo. It really doesn't matter and not worth discussion beyond what has already transpired.

Sent from my Pixel XL using BtownBanners mobile app
 

He took his number or Matt was willing to give it up?  Big difference 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×