Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Yeah, Keion is a stud.  Much more of a facilitator that what he gets credit for.  Highlight videos showing a dunk through the lane or whatever are fun, but don't really show the impact he has out there.  Keion is definitely not a post player, but both he and Archie like passing out of the post, so I'd expect to see him utilized there.  We'll have talent for sure.  I saw the info from jbell about De'Ron possibly graduating early.  Trayce won't be enough to cover for Juwan and De'Ron in there, so I really hope Race can get back.  We could stand to get another big immovable object to play in there.  
 
Others have said it, but Keion might be the best interview I've seen.  
 
Why are people writing off Damezi?  He's a talent, too.  With Evan's minutes declining, I wouldn't be too surprised if he gets in there more.  
Brooks will pop this week. Bank it. Anderson is not going to get more minutes and archie has kind of settled in on a rotation without him and fitzner. Why would you even want them playing more? They are massive liabilities.

Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk

Posted
 
Great, I'll dump that in the same bucket as the rest of your insight, such as:
 
"I always wanted mack. He wil [sic] be a stud coach." -- posted during the UofL game while we were losing.
"Rob just kills us many times." -- posted towards the end of the UofL game, before Rob won the game for us (again).
"No reason the [sic] schedule such tough games in the presrason [sic]. We loss [sic] them amyway [sic]."  -- posted during the UofL game, before we won it
You honestly took the time to copy my posts from saturday? Wow.

Mack will be a stud coach. I take it you think different.

Rob does kill us many times with stupid unforced turnovers. I take it you think he plays flawless with zero mistakes because he made some threes. His mistakes did not costs us in this game. Louisville had some terrible turnovers to even it out. That wont be the case when we go to michigan.

Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk

Posted

Nobody is knocking them. Just stating they will not be in the rotation. There are only so many minutes to go around. Why play somebody who is not ready?

Love how we're knocking on players that have been with our team for only roughly 4/5 months and we've written them off as if there's no room for improvement for them over the course of the rest of the season...


Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk

Posted
29 minutes ago, Stromboli said:

 

Great, I'll dump that in the same bucket as the rest of your insight, such as:

 

"I always wanted mack. He wil [sic] be a stud coach." -- posted during the UofL game while we were losing.

"Rob just kills us many times." -- posted towards the end of the UofL game, before Rob won the game for us (again).

"No reason the [sic] schedule such tough games in the presrason [sic]. We loss [sic] them amyway [sic]."  -- posted during the UofL game, before we won it

I believe it was said that Rob does not have a good iq. Which is ludicrous! 

Posted
1 hour ago, Bailey7878 said:

You honestly took the time to copy my posts from saturday? Wow.

Mack will be a stud coach. I take it you think different.

Rob does kill us many times with stupid unforced turnovers. I take it you think he plays flawless with zero mistakes because he made some threes. His mistakes did not costs us in this game. Louisville had some terrible turnovers to even it out. That wont be the case when we go to michigan.

Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk
 

Phinisee is a true freshman, he makes mistakes and I've always said he was going to.  He's also the best choice we have at point and has proven that.

Posted
31 minutes ago, Old Friend said:

Help me understand.  He "kills us" with stupid, unforced turnovers?"    He has 19 on the season.   Not even 2 per game; and he plays 28 minutes every game.   Indiana would have lost to Duke if he had zero TO's that night.  In the other game IU lost, he had zero turnovers.    (By the way, he had zero in each Big Ten game, also) So how does he "kill us?"    Every college player turns the ball over.   Green has 2 fewer turnovers in 86 fewer minutes.  Juwon Morgan has 2 MORE turnovers and handles the ball far less.  Langford also has more turnovers.

I don't know what you're really trying to say, but Phinisee's TO's are pretty normal and average in the overall scheme of things.   Given what we've seen in recent years, I'll take a freshman point guard with a 1.9:1 A/TO ratio.  Especially when he also averages almost 3 RPG and shoots 41% from the 3-point arc.

He has not "killed us" at all and his mistakes have not "cost us" yet.  Every team and every player turns the ball over.  His numbers aren't outstanding in any way as it relates to TO's.  Why single him out?

Post of the day!

Posted
Help me understand.  He "kills us" with stupid, unforced turnovers?"    He has 19 on the season.   Not even 2 per game; and he plays 28 minutes every game.   Indiana would have lost to Duke if he had zero TO's that night.  In the other game IU lost, he had zero turnovers.    (By the way, he had zero in each Big Ten game, also) So how does he "kill us?"    Every college player turns the ball over.   Green has 2 fewer turnovers in 86 fewer minutes.  Juwon Morgan has 2 MORE turnovers and handles the ball far less.  Langford also has more turnovers.
I don't know what you're really trying to say, but Phinisee's TO's are pretty normal and average in the overall scheme of things.   Given what we've seen in recent years, I'll take a freshman point guard with a 1.9:1 A/TO ratio.  Especially when he also averages almost 3 RPG and shoots 41% from the 3-point arc.
He has not "killed us" at all and his mistakes have not "cost us" yet.  Every team and every player turns the ball over.  His numbers aren't outstanding in any way as it relates to TO's.  Why single him out?
Darn the logic and facts

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

Posted
Help me understand.  He "kills us" with stupid, unforced turnovers?"    He has 19 on the season.   Not even 2 per game; and he plays 28 minutes every game.   Indiana would have lost to Duke if he had zero TO's that night.  In the other game IU lost, he had zero turnovers.    (By the way, he had zero in each Big Ten game, also) So how does he "kill us?"    Every college player turns the ball over.   Green has 2 fewer turnovers in 86 fewer minutes.  Juwon Morgan has 2 MORE turnovers and handles the ball far less.  Langford also has more turnovers.
I don't know what you're really trying to say, but Phinisee's TO's are pretty normal and average in the overall scheme of things.   Given what we've seen in recent years, I'll take a freshman point guard with a 1.9:1 A/TO ratio.  Especially when he also averages almost 3 RPG and shoots 41% from the 3-point arc.
He has not "killed us" at all and his mistakes have not "cost us" yet.  Every team and every player turns the ball over.  His numbers aren't outstanding in any way as it relates to TO's.  Why single him out?


Crickets@bailey7878?


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...