Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 hours ago, TheWatShot said:

Duke is playing at Miami just 48 hours after hosting UNC. Was this a rescheduled game? Seems weird to have two games that close together. 

 

 

LOL.  Back in the day it was the norm in the Big 10.  Thursday and Saturday.  Then God created ESPN and things changed.

Posted
14 minutes ago, craigyv88 said:

That brings back good memories.  The pre-BTN channel 4 days were some good times.  I remember having to rotate the big antenna outside at my parents' house to pick up those Saturday afternoon Big Ten slates but they were always fun.

Those were the good ole days. I remember trying to stay up late to watch the Benny Hill show. 

Posted
40 minutes ago, Henryville Hoosier said:

If my memory serves me right the games were on channel 4.

You also had travel partners which made it easy to remember your schedule

Posted
1 hour ago, HoosierAloha said:

Logical travel partners for the Big 1.o for shits and gigs?

Rutger - Maryland
Penn State - Ohio State
Michigan - Michigan State
Indiana - Purdoodoo
Illinois - Northwestern
Wiscy - Minny
Iowa - Nebrasketball
UCLA - USC

It sounds like they aren't going to do anything in terms of scheduling and the 'randomness' of it.  Not sure why.  Personally I'm not a fan of 'locked' rivalries -- think it immediately turns into an advantage/disadvantage for a team to have a locked rival based on how good that team is.  I.e., if IU/Purdue are locked rivals and guaranteed to play each other twice/year, and Wisconsin/Minnesota are, then Wisky gets a big advantage in conference standings.

IMO, schedule should be based on balance as much as possible -- use the standings from the previous year.  I also don't like 20 games in conference and would prefer it cut to 18.

An 18 game conference schedule could be locked and balanced by even up the double games:

group 1:  teams that finished 1, 8, 9, and 16 the previous year.

group 2: teams that finished 2,7, 10, and 15 the previous year.

group 3:  teams that finished 3, 6, 11, and 14 the previous year.

group 4:  teams that finished 4, 5, 12, and 13 the previous year.

Each group plays everyone in their own group twice and all other teams once......OR 

each team in group 1 plays each team in group 4 twice and everyone else once and each team in group 2 plays each team in group 3 twice.  This would result in a 19 game conference schedule.

Posted
5 hours ago, HoosierAloha said:

Logical travel partners for the Big 1.o for shits and gigs?

Rutger - Maryland
Penn State - Ohio State
Michigan - Michigan State
Indiana - Purdoodoo
Illinois - Northwestern
Wiscy - Minny
Iowa - Nebrasketball
UCLA - USC

When there were 10 teams 

IU/OSU 

MSU/UM 

PU/UI 

UW/NW 

Iowa/ Minn.

Posted
10 minutes ago, Scotty R said:

When there were 10 teams 

IU/OSU 

MSU/UM 

PU/UI 

UW/NW 

Iowa/ Minn.

A semi kinda ok twist (but I only care today). 
Anaheim Cal hotel has the BTN channel. Hell the east coast Hiltons don’t have it. 

Posted
It sounds like they aren't going to do anything in terms of scheduling and the 'randomness' of it.  Not sure why.  Personally I'm not a fan of 'locked' rivalries -- think it immediately turns into an advantage/disadvantage for a team to have a locked rival based on how good that team is.  I.e., if IU/Purdue are locked rivals and guaranteed to play each other twice/year, and Wisconsin/Minnesota are, then Wisky gets a big advantage in conference standings.
IMO, schedule should be based on balance as much as possible -- use the standings from the previous year.  I also don't like 20 games in conference and would prefer it cut to 18.
An 18 game conference schedule could be locked and balanced by even up the double games:
group 1:  teams that finished 1, 8, 9, and 16 the previous year.
group 2: teams that finished 2,7, 10, and 15 the previous year.
group 3:  teams that finished 3, 6, 11, and 14 the previous year.
group 4:  teams that finished 4, 5, 12, and 13 the previous year.
Each group plays everyone in their own group twice and all other teams once......OR 
each team in group 1 plays each team in group 4 twice and everyone else once and each team in group 2 plays each team in group 3 twice.  This would result in a 19 game conference schedule.

The Big 1.o would never go for it but I’d be good with an EPL promotion and relegation style for shits and gigs.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...