incrediboy Posted April 27, 2023 Posted April 27, 2023 I, for one, HATE that the Big Ten continues to expand. Are conferences for fans or for conference executives? I believe most fans will agree because we don't really care about profits...and I don't think profit should be the underlying factor in conferences. Expansion dilutes the intensity of the rivalries we have come to enjoy...even love! Every time teams are added, we take away games against other long-established conference rivals. How do we as fans make our opinions known? And would it make a difference if conference officials knew the fans hated it? Would they choose fans over money? Something to talk about. cthomas, ALASKA HOOSIER and Hardwood83 3 Quote
CSP Posted April 27, 2023 Posted April 27, 2023 I don't really have an issue with conference expansion. Would have preferred the B12 not to dissolve though. OK+Tex in the SEC will be a little weird. hoosierbgh and lillurk 2 Quote
Hovadipo Posted April 27, 2023 Posted April 27, 2023 3 minutes ago, incrediboy said: And would it make a difference if conference officials knew the fans hated it? Would they choose fans over money? No and...no. Also, not everyone hates it. I'm kind of excited for SC and LA to join. I welcome change. lillurk, Banksyrules and CSP 3 Quote
JSHoosier Posted April 27, 2023 Posted April 27, 2023 While I kind of liked when the B1G was more Midwest oriented, it doesn't really bother me; although I would've preferred not adding a New Jersey team to try and tap into the NY market. Hopefully schedulers do some planning because it would be rough having to go from 1 coast to the next for consecutive games. It could open avenues for other rivalries to develop as well. IU and UCLA are two historic bluebloods that will get to face off now too. thebigweave and lillurk 2 Quote
Alford Bailey Posted April 27, 2023 Posted April 27, 2023 43 minutes ago, incrediboy said: I, for one, HATE that the Big Ten continues to expand. Are conferences for fans or for conference executives? I believe most fans will agree because we don't really care about profits...and I don't think profit should be the underlying factor in conferences. Expansion dilutes the intensity of the rivalries we have come to enjoy...even love! Every time teams are added, we take away games against other long-established conference rivals. How do we as fans make our opinions known? And would it make a difference if conference officials knew the fans hated it? Would they choose fans over money? Something to talk about. They would choose money over fans every day of the week Home Jersey, lillurk, cthomas and 1 other 4 Quote
go iu bb Posted April 27, 2023 Posted April 27, 2023 9 minutes ago, Alford Bailey said: They would choose money over fans every day of the week Each conference effectively has it's own little monopoly. Sure, there are other schools and conferences but none of those have the advantage of the emotional attachment that fans have with their current fandom. Sure, they can lose fans but for the most part I would guess that the numbers don't change much. As such, there isn't any real motivation to choose the fans over money when they can choose the money and keep the fans. So you're absolutely correct and the options of fans probably isn't much of a factor at all when making decisions. Probably doesn't even get brought up. Alford Bailey 1 Quote
Scotty R Posted April 27, 2023 Posted April 27, 2023 3 hours ago, Hovadipo said: No and...no. Also, not everyone hates it. I'm kind of excited for SC and LA to join. I welcome change. I truly hate it but have to accept it. For me a conference should be for teams in your region and should be able to play every team at home and the road. Alford Bailey and cthomas 2 Quote
Loaded Chicken Sandwich Posted April 27, 2023 Posted April 27, 2023 8 hours ago, Hovadipo said: No and...no. Also, not everyone hates it. I'm kind of excited for SC and LA to join. I welcome change. Yup... Definitely on the opposite end of the spectrum here. I am still holding out hope that the Big Ten goes back to 11. Hardwood83 and ALASKA HOOSIER 2 Quote
Scotty R Posted April 27, 2023 Posted April 27, 2023 7 minutes ago, Loaded Chicken Sandwich said: Yup... Definitely on the opposite end of the spectrum here. I am still holding out hope that the Big Ten goes back to 11. I was hoping going back to 10 lillurk, ALASKA HOOSIER and Hardwood83 3 Quote
RaceToTheTop Posted April 28, 2023 Posted April 28, 2023 2 hours ago, Loaded Chicken Sandwich said: Yup... Definitely on the opposite end of the spectrum here. I am still holding out hope that the Big Ten goes back to 11. Start by removing Purdue. They'll never see it coming. ALASKA HOOSIER and Loaded Chicken Sandwich 2 Quote
Hardwood83 Posted April 28, 2023 Posted April 28, 2023 2 hours ago, Loaded Chicken Sandwich said: Yup... Definitely on the opposite end of the spectrum here. I am still holding out hope that the Big Ten goes back to 11. Yes! or even 10, keep Nebraska or Penn St and send Northwestern to the MAC where they belong. Quote
cthomas Posted April 28, 2023 Posted April 28, 2023 3 hours ago, Loaded Chicken Sandwich said: Yup... Definitely on the opposite end of the spectrum here. I am still holding out hope that the Big Ten goes back to 11. Or at least change the stupid name. No matter how creative you get with the logo we are not in any like the original Big 10. Just be honest and call it something else. mamasa, RaceToTheTop and ALASKA HOOSIER 2 1 Quote
OGIUAndy Posted April 28, 2023 Posted April 28, 2023 52 minutes ago, cthomas said: Or at least change the stupid name. No matter how creative you get with the logo we are not in any like the original Big 10. Just be honest and call it something else. Who cares about the name of the conference. Quote
RaceToTheTop Posted April 28, 2023 Posted April 28, 2023 17 minutes ago, OGIUAndy said: Who cares about the name of the conference. Me. Big Ten makes no sense. mamasa and ALASKA HOOSIER 1 1 Quote
Loaded Chicken Sandwich Posted April 28, 2023 Posted April 28, 2023 7 hours ago, RaceToTheTop said: Me. Big Ten makes no sense. The Big Postseason Chokers. Home Jersey and ALASKA HOOSIER 2 Quote
RaceToTheTop Posted April 28, 2023 Posted April 28, 2023 12 hours ago, Loaded Chicken Sandwich said: The Big Postseason Chokers. The Big Thirteen plus Nebraska. Loaded Chicken Sandwich 1 Quote
Alford Bailey Posted April 29, 2023 Posted April 29, 2023 It’s eat or be eaten now. I suspect we get down to a couple super major conferences with too much power then we will start seeing schools splinter off when they don’t get what was promised. Make take 10-15 years though. Quote
HoosierAloha Posted April 29, 2023 Posted April 29, 2023 Let's get 4/8 more schools and then go Big 1.o East/West or Big 1.o old/new with 10/12 in each division. Play everyone in your division twice and other division once (or half) then one preseason tourney. Quote
OGIUAndy Posted April 29, 2023 Posted April 29, 2023 On 4/27/2023 at 11:11 PM, RaceToTheTop said: Me. Big Ten makes no sense. It's brand identity, it's not important if the name is literal. If you change it to Big 16 would that be a good name? Would people know what it was? A lot teams and leagues have names that don't make sense. I suppose the Lakers should change their name because there are no lakes in LA. ACC (Atlantic Coast Conference) has ND and Louisville. So you think all these leagues should change their name every time they add teams because it "makes no sense"? Hollywood Mike Miranda and Home Jersey 2 Quote
Alford Bailey Posted April 29, 2023 Posted April 29, 2023 Anybody remember the Big 8? Tasmanian Devil and yogisballin 1 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.