Jump to content

General Coach Candidate News

JaybobHoosier

By JaybobHoosier
in Indiana Men's Basketball

 Share

Recommended Posts

coonhounds Newbie

coonhounds

Posted
Posted
Has Chris, ap, JY or RTZ chimed in after the “comment” from “Brad”?  
 
Has there been any other comments from Stevens denying interest?  Surely I missed another comment but was out for the evening and playing catchup now. Not sure why everyone has given up. 
Cause isac is only one backing this up

Sent from my SM-S926U using Tapatalk

  • Replies 52.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Chris007

    1999

  • Trish

    1275

  • Stuhoo

    1116

  • AZ Hoosier

    916

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

JerryYeagley23
JerryYeagley23

This should go without saying obviously, but there will be no press conference tomorrow. I’ll be able to take the lid off a bit later in the week. But will say this, anybody providing details right no

JerryYeagley23
JerryYeagley23

I’ve had several PM’s so wanted to drop a quick line to the broader board. Love this group and fully intend to continue to contribute to the community, Im not going anywhere. (Sorry to a few of you) B

RoadToZion
RoadToZion

So I couldn’t get much from him unfortunately. But, to me that’s a good thing. There’s been pretty much zero chatter, nor leaks for a month about coaches. He said it doesn’t matter that the season is

Posted Images

HoosierInParadise Newbie

HoosierInParadise

Posted
Posted
At almost 60 years old, I choose to believe the trolls are accurate. Because if they are not, well, there are dregs for that. 
I'm with you. I am questioning in my head why other media outlets are not all over this. Yes, a couple places (SI and Insidethehall) are reporting the original quote, but most are completely avoiding it. For example, unless I missed it, I haven't heard Benetti or Hummel bring it up at all during the broadcast of the game. I also haven't seen it come across ESPN, CBS sports, etc. Seems like too big of news to not say anything at all.
8bucks Newbie

8bucks

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, coonhounds said:

Cause isac is only one backing this up

Sent from my SM-S926U using Tapatalk
 

So Chris, ap, JY and RTz have said it is over. I did not see their posts. 

4iufourever Newbie

4iufourever

Posted
Posted
Just now, coonhounds said:

Cause isac is only one backing this up

Sent from my SM-S926U using Tapatalk
 

The other "insiders" are trying to  concoct an excuse.  "Well, the contract was sent, but then the Celtics found out so BS panicked...yadda yadda yadda...."  

Don't believe any of their crap.  I do give Isac credit for at least coming back to post.  The others are hiding out. 

BlueDevil Newbie

BlueDevil

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, OKHOOSIER said:

I think what frustrates me most with the Beard issue is no one in the pro-Beard community is willing to admit the only reason Beard is even an option is because he got fired for cause from his alma mater for felony domestic violence. The focus is all on the charges being dropped. Okay, that’s fine if you want to believe it was all make believe, but that doesn’t change the fact that 1. Texas paid him zero dollars and he didn’t litigate it, and 2. Had it not happened, Beard wouldn’t be an option at all. The two issues (Beard being an option and why he is) are interconnected. Had the DV thing never happened, Beard would be less likely than Oats or Stevens. There is not one without the other. 

I am in the Beard camp and honestly he is my number 1. However if Dolson and Indiana fully vetted him and said no he is not an option I am fine with that. I just want the university to do their due diligence and homework on a guy that would crawl to Bloomington and I believe would win big. I would be satisfied if they did this and said no. 

Hoosierfan1901 Apprentice

Hoosierfan1901

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, 8bucks said:

So Chris, ap, JY and RTz have said it is over. I did not see their posts. 

They haven’t said anything since the Goodman tweet, but before that tweet, they were pretty optimistic. I’m guessing they will not be posting anything after today’s fiasco. Don’t blame them at all

LamarCheeks Apprentice

LamarCheeks

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Hoosierfan1901 said:

They haven’t said anything since the Goodman tweet, but before that tweet, they were pretty optimistic 

Yeah -- I thought it was interesting that Isaac said he's still hearing what Chris and Yeagley are hearing. 

But we don't know what, if anything, they're hearing -- because they're not posting. 

There is a game going on, so that could be why. 

I'm not blaming anything on them; I'm just kinda curious as to their take on what happened. 

WayneFleekHoosier Contributor

WayneFleekHoosier

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, BlueDevil said:

I am in the Beard camp and honestly he is my number 1. However if Dolson and Indiana fully vetted him and said no he is not an option I am fine with that. I just want the university to do their due diligence and homework on a guy that would crawl to Bloomington and I believe would win big. I would be satisfied if they did this and said no. 

I’m 100% in this camp.  He’s the most sure thing out there. 

IUFAN1976 Newbie

IUFAN1976

Posted
Posted
45 minutes ago, coonhounds said:

I will take him. I feel longer odds than stevens. I mean if we do get dusty what a horrible way to go about it. Waiting a year? If you are may huge gamble leaving

Sent from my SM-S926U using Tapatalk
 

100%!  All because of freaking QBall! 

Hardwood83 Newbie

Hardwood83

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Hornsby said:

Just go get Cronin at this point. The stevens stuff is just dumb now

Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk
 

Why settle? If Cronin is the best option, sure, but does anyone really believe that he is? Well, now that I think about it we had many pages of BS about BS, so maybe we are that gullible. Hire the best guy you can find. Spoiler alert: Brad Stevens doesn't want the job, so it's not him. 

HoosierTrav Newbie

HoosierTrav

Posted
Posted

If we’ve learned anything about the last two searches [in regard to stevens] it’s that it went EXACTLY the same way both times. The only thing missing from this time, is that our refusal to drop the delusion hasn’t led to a more convincing “masshole” denial from Stevens. Keep up the belief and that should be happening within the next week or two. 

BlueDevil Newbie

BlueDevil

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:

I’m 100% in this camp.  He’s the most sure thing out there. 

100% and I will be sick if he’s just brushed to the side without being fully looked into. 

Hoosierfan1901 Apprentice

Hoosierfan1901

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, LamarCheeks said:

Yeah -- I thought it was interesting that Isaac said he's still hearing what Chris and Yeagley are hearing. 

But we don't know what, if anything, they're hearing -- because they're not posting. 

There is a game going on, so that could be why. 

I'm not blaming anything on them; I'm just kinda curious as to their take on what happened. 

Seems like most reporters are rolling with the Goodman Article, could be a smokescreen could be not. Personally, he isn’t coming here at all.

  • Popular Post
8bucks Newbie

8bucks

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
2 minutes ago, Hoosierfan1901 said:

They haven’t said anything since the Goodman tweet, but before that tweet, they were pretty optimistic 

Stevens said “I thoroughly appreciate being a Celtic and love the people I get to work with everyday”. Then he supposedly said he is not a candidate for the job but it is not a definite no and is interestingly not quoted. 
 

Ok maybe he is out but Dusty says this and yet he is still possible. “But that stuff’s crazy. I love being at Michigan. I love our team. We’re fighting like crazy. That’s it. This place is my foundation, but I’m very, very happy at the University of Michigan. We were here to win a game, and mission accomplished.”

Hornsby Newbie

Hornsby

Posted
Posted
Why settle? If Cronin is the best option, sure, but does anyone really believe that he is? Well, now that I think about it we had many pages of BS about BS, so maybe we are that gullible. Hire the best guy you can find. Spoiler alert: Brad Stevens doesn't want the job, so it's not him. 
Because if we can't get may who else is there. Iu won't touch beard or pearl. He is that next tier.

Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk

Ryno6284 Rookie

Ryno6284

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, OKHOOSIER said:

I think what frustrates me most with the Beard issue is no one in the pro-Beard community is willing to admit the only reason Beard is even an option is because he got fired for cause from his alma mater for felony domestic violence. The focus is all on the charges being dropped. Okay, that’s fine if you want to believe it was all make believe, but that doesn’t change the fact that 1. Texas paid him zero dollars and he didn’t litigate it, and 2. Had it not happened, Beard wouldn’t be an option at all. The two issues (Beard being an option and why he is) are interconnected. Had the DV thing never happened, Beard would be less likely than Oats or Stevens. There is not one without the other. 

We don't know that to be absolute though either. How do you know RMK didn't tell him about the pinnacle of cbb at IU when they were at TT together? Maybe he always thought IU was a better job than Texas and that was a stepping stone.

We just don't know, but one thing we do know is he wants the job and would do well here!

I'm not saying he isn't a risk, but I would be willing to risk it for the reward he could reap.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing


×
×
  • Create New...