Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, chumbo07 said:

If Brownell wasn’t from Indiana, he wouldn’t even be mentioned. And that’s the part that frustrates me the most. I don’t think he gets it, but I mean just being mentioned is enough to make me cringe. 

It's like the Beard RMK connection being talked about. It doesn't matter, tons of coaches have RMK connections and most of them wouldn't be successful at Indiana. These are not good criteria for hiring coaches.

Posted
4 minutes ago, lillurk said:

No ill will towards Brownell personally but I maintain it really doesn’t make lots of sense unless you get into a UCLA situation where like EVERYONE else says no. No indication that’s the case here.

Agree with this. If we end up with Brownell, that means either Dolson loves these searches so wants to run it back in 4, or we whiffed on about 12 other coaches. 
I’m going with he won’t be our coach. Not worried at all. 

Posted
1 minute ago, SlammySammy said:

I think while a lot of us have differing favs, I think we can all agree (maybe not Kathy) but the program really needs an inspiring hire at this time in its history. While McCollum has question marks, he has some history that can inspire fans if communicated correctly and not just "he comes from a D2 background".....Stevens would be inspiring as well for obvious reason....the risk is LOSING THE FANS....IU basketball can easily become the old IU football where half the stadium is filled.....

 

Just an opinion from an old Italian "businessman"

I am adamant that we don't need an inspiring hire. Inspiring or not, the coach has to win games (and not embarrass the university off the court.) We don't need to win the press conference or off-season. We need a basketball coach that will win games.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Home Jersey said:

Dolson can’t even lock up Ben freakin McCollum but he’s got Brad ******* Stevens signed, sealed, and delivered since February… lmao

I'm not saying I believe Stevens is signed sealed and delivered....but if he was, and had been since February, why would he have had to try to lock up Ben McCollum?  I mean if Brad was the guy and had a verbal as has been mentioned (again, I don't know that he has), he wouldn't be locking anyone else up...  

just a thought

Posted
7 minutes ago, HinnyHoosier said:

RTZ must be dangerously close to the truth. The Kathy unit has been thawed and deployed.

Edit: And now all of a sudden Brownell is today's smoke? Yep. Sounds about right.

I think KathyC might be AI. No one actually speaks on sports board like she does, right? 

She's such a weird combination of dismissive, self-righteous and oddly formal. 

Posted
Just now, Mr. Hoosier Pride said:

I'm not saying I believe Stevens is signed sealed and delivered....but if he was, and had been since February, why would he have had to try to lock up Ben McCollum?  I mean if Brad was the guy and had a verbal as has been mentioned (again, I don't know that he has), he wouldn't be locking anyone else up...  

just a thought

Yep that makes sense. You don’t need a “back up” if you’ve got an agreement in place with someone already. 

Posted
45 minutes ago, hper50 said:

Gosh you guys.... I went to the game yesterday.... just now catching up.... and I'm 120 pages behind. Love you all. Anyone care to summarize?

Woodson is done or almost done. We're hiring a coach to replace him at some point. Isaac is definitely a troll and Kathy is back. That's about it.

Posted
1 minute ago, Rusty Shackleford said:

Another way to look at the timeline: if we don't make the tournament and there's no announcement on Monday, it ain't Brad

I'll add this: if there's no handshake deal with a coach by now, it's malpractice. Scott has had 5 weeks officially for this search (really a year) and portal backchanneling has been happening for months already. Whoever the next coach is will need to have been aware of the job they're stepping into and started evaluating the roster and potential additions. 

That’s the thing for me. I get that no one may have a signature on a contract but I find it hard to believe that we don’t have our number one target with at least a verbal agreement. What would they still be negotiating? Parking spots and PTO days? That doesn’t mean we still aren’t doing due diligence but I can’t believe we would still be at the gathering candidates phase. 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...