Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
No. I’m saying you can’t simultaneously argue that the reason there are no leaks is because the NDAs are likely ironclad but then also imply you’re somehow in the know. 
But you can...not everyone follows what they sign. However, having an NDA would definitely slow the flow of information.
Posted
2 minutes ago, TadQueasy said:

We are not the same.  I am very happy with my wife and her looks.  But she has 2 sisters that I would never describe as even close to hot.  And they are a major pain in my backside!  

 

1 minute ago, TadQueasy said:

We are not the same.  I am very happy with my wife and her looks.  But she has 2 sisters that I would never describe as even close to hot.  And they are a major pain in my backside!  

A post so nice, you made it twice. LOL.

VBG

Posted
7 minutes ago, Truthhurts said:

No. I’m saying you can’t simultaneously argue that the reason there are no leaks is because the NDAs are likely ironclad but then also imply you’re somehow in the know. 

Yeah, it seems like if there are either NDAs in place then any info is unreliable.

But I doubt that they are using NDAs. I'd expect Dolson is just sharing info on a need to know basis among people he trusts.

Posted
5 minutes ago, HoosierInParadise said:
10 minutes ago, Truthhurts said:
No. I’m saying you can’t simultaneously argue that the reason there are no leaks is because the NDAs are likely ironclad but then also imply you’re somehow in the know. 

But you can...not everyone follows what they sign. However, having an NDA would definitely slow the flow of information.

Yes, that is true. But you’re misunderstanding my point. 

Posted
11 minutes ago, TadQueasy said:

We are not the same.  I am very happy with my wife and her looks.  But she has 2 sisters that I would never describe as even close to hot.  And they are a major pain in my backside!  

Ahhh Tad, beauty is only a light switch away, & the worst I ever had was still wonderful…

Posted
10 minutes ago, the_jackal said:

Yes, we were in deep talks until Drew got promises of more NIL at Baylor. funny that you responded to my DM saying everything you've heard from those you trust around campus is it will be Drew too. 

I gave 5 names, Stevens (don't refute we inquired, but he directly said NO again), Drew (mutual interest til there wasn't), Otz (mutual interest til there wasn't), Mccollum (speaking to him now), and Beard (fully vetted and said no to him). We don't have a coach signed yet. I don't know who the next coach will be at this hour because no coach has been selected by Scott. 

Since it's known the 5 coaches i mentioned had or since have been spoken to/vetted, would love for someone to tell me where exactly my info was wrong at the time. It appears my info has been the only credible info provided to this board in weeks, which was Scott's original list of names

- Jackal

Yes Baylor is going to have $10m in NIL next year even if IU promised Drew $7m it’s hard to get up to $10m

Posted
10 minutes ago, the_jackal said:

Yes, we were in deep talks until Drew got promises of more NIL at Baylor. funny that you responded to my DM saying everything you've heard from those you trust around campus is it will be Drew too. 

I gave 5 names, Stevens (don't refute we inquired, but he directly said NO again), Drew (mutual interest til there wasn't), Otz (mutual interest til there wasn't), Mccollum (speaking to him now), and Beard (fully vetted and said no to him). We don't have a coach signed yet. I don't know who the next coach will be at this hour because no coach has been selected by Scott. 

Since it's known the 5 coaches i mentioned had or since have been spoken to/vetted, would love for someone to tell me where exactly my info was wrong at the time. It appears my info has been the only credible info provided to this board in weeks, which was Scott's original list of names

- Jackal

Here’s the problem with the “inside” information. Everything you said about the coaches has been seen on multiple social media platforms. Maybe you were the first. That’s not my point. My point is, you say these things as if they are fact. And maybe they are. But given you haven’t said anything many, many other people have said, it tells me that either lots of people actually know what’s going on, or almost no one does. I’m guessing, no one does.

Posted
3 minutes ago, MikeRoberts said:

Interesting, I was there too:)

Scott and Brad were both in South Bend that day? I imagine Scott was but was not aware that Brad was too. 
Anymore details as to where they met, anyone that saw them together? Any flight details from Brad’s flight there and back?

While this was quite some time ago it is interesting and just curious if there is more info on this?

There have been some but would have to look back, off the top of my head Clark Co, Teterboro, Bedford Mass all in Miami together on the morning of Feb 14

Bedford Mass and Clark Co in Teterboro together on Feb 28. One of the time they were all at Marco island together.

When I say Clark Co I mean Pfau. Teterboro is where the search firm is and flys out of.

 

Posted
28 minutes ago, jimsorgi said:

Not to get in the middle of whether anyone has actually signed an NDA (because I have no interest in debating that): for what its worth, I've seen plenty with specified LDs. I don't look at NDAs often and certainly haven't reviewed 1000 of them, so maybe it's industry-specific in my case.

My only NDAs were govt work so treason does sometimes end in liquidation I guess. In all seriousness I use to have to sign them for some contracts (especially when I was doing work for startups before the .com bubble burst) and I could have sworn there was monetary penalties for breaking the NDA - I'm not a lawyers so not sure that's the same thing.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...