Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

IUc2016

NCAA MBB Transfer Portal

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, IndyHoops said:

How much does he give up on the other end? 
 

Also, would Woodson’s offense support the volume of shots Blackmon needs?

Blackmon isn’t going to take the same volume of shots at a P5 school regardless of where he goes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, RaceToTheTop said:

Blackmon isn’t going to take the same volume of shots at a P5 school regardless of where he goes.

Then he isn’t going to be as effective, correct?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, IndyHoops said:

Then he isn’t going to be as effective, correct?

yes he’s not likely to replicate what he did at Stetson at the P5 level on the same volume. Still think he can be an efficient 3 point shooter on volume. Something IU hasn’t had since his brother played here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, AH1971 said:

No clue, I wouldn’t imagine he’d draw the toughest assignment on defense. Purdue has made it work with Loyer who is a black hole defensively.

Would be interesting to see Blackmon on the floor when he isn’t the opposing teams 1st, 2nd, and 3rd priority. Worst case he’s a shooter that spaces the floor but he was better than any single guard on this last years team.

Loyer is hidden because they have Edey in the paint. Let’s see what Loyer is like next year.

I don’t know how effective Blackmon is going to be getting up 6 shots a game versus 10. He doesn’t seem like a player that’s going to be contempt passing the ball to Reneau 10 times while giving up shots. He isn’t a playmaker and doesn’t play defense….

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, IndyHoops said:

Loyer is hidden because they have Edey in the paint. Let’s see what Loyer is like next year.

I don’t know how effective Blackmon is going to be getting up 6 shots a game versus 10. He doesn’t seem like a player that’s going to be contempt passing the ball to Reneau 10 times while giving up shots. He isn’t a playmaker and doesn’t play defense….

No 2 guard should be taking only 6 shots a game at any level of basketball. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, AH1971 said:

No 2 guard should be taking only 6 shots a game at any level of basketball. 

Agreed. But I think Galloway starts at the 2, which means Blackmon comes off the bench. I don’t see more than 6-8 attempts a game for whoever IU gets at the 2. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, IndyHoops said:

Agreed. But I think Galloway starts at the 2, which means Blackmon comes off the bench. I don’t see more than 6-8 attempts a game for whoever IU gets at the 2. 

We’re doing it wrong if that is the plan. Galloway should NEVER be the lead guard in any offense ever.

Transfer PG

Transfer 2 G (Blackmon)

Galloway

MM

Reneau

And if we’re dead set on playing two 5’s next year and playing MM on the wing then there’s no way you can start Galloway.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, AH1971 said:

We’re doing it wrong if that is the plan. Galloway should NEVER be the lead guard in any offense ever.

Transfer PG

Transfer 2 G (Blackmon)

Galloway

MM

Reneau

And if we’re dead set on playing two 5’s next year and playing MM on the wing then there’s no way you can start Galloway.

 

How much you wanna bet IU starts 2 bigs, MM at the 3, and Galloway at the 2?    
 

Prove me wrong Mike….    :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, IndyHoops said:

How much you wanna bet IU starts 2 bigs, MM at the 3, and Galloway at the 2?    
 

Prove me wrong Mike….    :)

But come to think of it, if that is the route IU does indeed go, both your 1 and 2 guards need to be high volume/high make 3 point shooters or you run the risk of teams packing the lane again all year. If you want to play like Purdue you need to have shooters like Purdue. Blackmon fits that bill.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, AH1971 said:

But come to think of it, if that is the route IU does indeed go, both your 1 and 2 guards need to be high volume/high make 3 point shooters or you run the risk of teams packing the lane again all year. If you want to play like Purdue you need to have shooters like Purdue. Blackmon fits that bill.

Yeah, it’s a start. Hopefully they pick up at least 3 kids like Blackmon. I obviously have my doubts that style of play is going to change much next year. Doesn’t matter if you have shooters if you don’t run anything for them….

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IU was 83rd in DefE last year. Can’t really afford a defender like Blackmon or even the kid from FAU, who was terrible on D most games I watched.  
 

IU needs guys that can impact both sides of the ball if they want to be competitive. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, AH1971 said:

We’re doing it wrong if that is the plan. Galloway should NEVER be the lead guard in any offense ever.

Transfer PG

Transfer 2 G (Blackmon)

Galloway

MM

Reneau

And if we’re dead set on playing two 5’s next year and playing MM on the wing then there’s no way you can start Galloway.

 

That would be a terrible defensive team.  Reneau offers zero rim protection.  Tbh, you either have to choose Reneau or Galloway to.start, but not both.  They're too similar of players; below average quickness, bad outside shooters, can only reliably score in the paint, average at best defenders.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, yard_dog said:

That would be a terrible defensive team.  Reneau offers zero rim protection.  Tbh, you either have to choose Reneau or Galloway to.start, but not both.  They're too similar of players; below average quickness, bad outside shooters, can only reliably score in the paint, average at best defenders.

We sucked at defense this year and actually had a rim protector. So what's it matter? Dive full in on having an elite fast paced offense. Just like Crean did in 14-15. Hell it got us a 10 seed. We are looking at missing the NIT again next year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, yard_dog said:

That would be a terrible defensive team.  Reneau offers zero rim protection.  Tbh, you either have to choose Reneau or Galloway to.start, but not both.  They're too similar of players; below average quickness, bad outside shooters, can only reliably score in the paint, average at best defenders.

That’s why I was hoping the black hole would have transferred.  He offers 0 rim protection, too slow to guard a stretch 4, playing him and another 5 together clogs the lane up, often makes poor decisions with ball, often gets into foul trouble.  I think Reneau and Galloway should come off the bench but we all know Woodson probably has promised them starting positions.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, yard_dog said:

That would be a terrible defensive team.  Reneau offers zero rim protection.  Tbh, you either have to choose Reneau or Galloway to.start, but not both.  They're too similar of players; below average quickness, bad outside shooters, can only reliably score in the paint, average at best defenders.

Guard the perimeter better and the need for rim protection (which is code for bad defense) becomes less and less relevant. We had elite rim protection this last season and still had terrible defensive metrics because we had so many players guarding outside their natural positions. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Myron Amey, San Jose State, 6'2" guard.  Averaged 15.7 points, 5.1 rebounds, 3.1 assists, 1.6 steals.  Shot 43/36/79.  Bulk three point shooter, made 71 of 196 threes this year

 
Hasan Abdul-Hakim, UT Rio-Grande Valley, 6'8" wing.  Averaged 13.2 points, 5.2 reb, 3.5 ast.  Shot 49/36/64.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Feathery said:

How many of FAU’s squad has eligibility left and BigTen quality?

I think 5 of their top 7 players have a Covid year. Goldin, Martin, and Davis could all play at this level I would think.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×