Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Portland v MSU is going to end before this game.

This has been a terrible end to the game. They've let the clock run well past the whistle or ball going through the net a handful of times. Pretty sure the officials and everyone else is over it by now.

Posted
34 minutes ago, HoosierAloha said:

Buy games so far, according to KP:

  • Morehead St - 258
  • Bethune - 325
  • Miami (OH) - 282
  • Little Rock - 329
  • Jackson St. - 302

Xavier - 31

Our current SOS is really poor (towards the bottom of D1 poor) but should get better soon with UNC, Arizona, and KU coming up. We could do some working on the area between the good and ugly part of the schedule.

Exactly. I could not care less about gaming the NET. I’m more worried about getting the team ready and those 250-300+ games are pretty worthless besides making the AD money.   
 

Every one of those games saw our guys out athlete those squads eventually, but that strategy was not helpful versus Xavier when we had to shorten the bench and play TJD most of the game. That’ll be more typical of B1G play than games where we get Banks and Gunn a bunch of minutes. I think we learned more about the team in the one Xavier game than all the other games combined. 
 

We play UNC and then start conf play. So only two real games to prepare for conf play. It’s not an optimal setup for performance. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, str8baller said:

Exactly. I could not care less about gaming the NET. I’m more worried about getting the team ready and those 250-300+ games are pretty worthless besides making the AD money.   
 

Every one of those games saw our guys out athlete those squads eventually, but that strategy was not helpful versus Xavier when we had to shorten the bench and play TJD most of the game. That’ll be more typical of B1G play than games where we get Banks and Gunn a bunch of minutes. I think we learned more about the team in the one Xavier game than all the other games combined. 
 

We play UNC and then start conf play. So only two real games to prepare for conf play. It’s not an optimal setup for performance. 

I wouldn’t say they were useless they let us play our bench even when they made mistakes.  Against a team in the mid 100s good chance we can’t do that and the guys don’t get experience.  

Do I think our schedule could be a bit tougher  Of course   But I think it’s very valuable that all of our freshmen and Bates have had the ability to play thru mistakes and learn  hopefully that pays off 

 

Posted

With the conference wanting 2  conference games early in the year almost every team will go into those games less prepared.  Unless you play in a pre tourney your competition is going into those games isn’t going to be the best.   B1G set the trend when they went to 20 games and know other conferences followed and play 2 early games.   Usually these games a sloppy as heck but still count like the rest. 

Posted
1 hour ago, mike vannice said:

Nate Oats coaching strategy-flip a coin to see who is going to go one on one.

That is why I never wanted him to be the coach at IU. There style of play is horrible to watch.

Posted
Exactly. I could not care less about gaming the NET. I’m more worried about getting the team ready and those 250-300+ games are pretty worthless besides making the AD money.   
 
Every one of those games saw our guys out athlete those squads eventually, but that strategy was not helpful versus Xavier when we had to shorten the bench and play TJD most of the game. That’ll be more typical of B1G play than games where we get Banks and Gunn a bunch of minutes. I think we learned more about the team in the one Xavier game than all the other games combined. 
 
We play UNC and then start conf play. So only two real games to prepare for conf play. It’s not an optimal setup for performance. 

There’s good and bad to it. I’d much rather have a few more games against solid competition over the 300+ teams. I believe that would help more than hurt. Some coaches and programs don’t want those possible Ls on their hands.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app
Posted
1 hour ago, Brass Cannon said:

But I think it’s very valuable that all of our freshmen and Bates have had the ability to play thru mistakes and learn  hopefully that pays off 

Our top freshman and Bates would play through those mistakes against better teams and be better off for it. They’re going to play through mistakes against B1G opponents.  Trading that experience for our young rotation guys for garbage minutes for Gunn and Banks (both of whom I like) seems like a sub-optimal trade-off to me.  

Posted
17 minutes ago, str8baller said:

Our top freshman and Bates would play through those mistakes against better teams and be better off for it. They’re going to play through mistakes against B1G opponents.  Trading that experience for our young rotation guys for garbage minutes for Gunn and Banks (both of whom I like) seems like a sub-optimal trade-off to me.  

All top teams at buy games and by the end of the non conference schedule we will play as tough of one as anyone. People get caught up with feast week and see teams playing other top teams but that is just one week

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...