2024-2025 IUBB Schedule

[Trish]

I think it’s a down year in the Big Ten. Overall, I see Indiana winning 15-17 games if healthy and if Woodson does indeed have the most talented team like he says. 

[LamarCheeks]

Complete schedule posted an hour or so ago on Twitter. 

Not sure I understand the blurring of "Schedule" -- but whatever ...  

[Home Jersey]

[IUHoosier5]

8 minutes ago, Home Jersey said:

The homer in me says 17-3.

[MikeRoberts]

1 hour ago, IUHoosier5 said:

The homer in me says 17-3.

No way we only win 11 games. If that is the result we pull out our pitchforks. That would be a huge disappointment

[IU Prof]

I'm guessing the win total ends up closer to 11 than 17. 13-7 looks about right to me.

[Stuhoo]

8 hours ago, MikeRoberts said:

No way we only win 11 games. If that is the result we pull out our pitchforks. That would be a huge disappointment

 

*As long as Myles Rice and Oumar Ballo stay reasonably healthy.

With those two we should win a ton of games. Without them we are a much easier team to game plan for.

 

[Scotty R]

10 hours ago, Home Jersey said:

We play 31 games so 19-10 is impossible 

[Demo]

 

 

 

Interesting comparison

[IU Prof]

5 hours ago, Scotty R said:

We play 31 games so 19-10 is impossible 

Can't predict the last two games in Atlantis until he knows the matchups.

[WayneFleekHoosier]

Feel like 15-5 is reasonable with this group. And could/should be better than that. To me the floor should be 13-7. 11-9 won’t be pretty if that’s what it ends up. I’m quite confident it won’t.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners

[HoosierHoopster]

20 hours ago, LIHoosier said:

No need to listen to the Soviet broadcast team of Revsine and Hummel.

What I like -- by the time we get to Jan. 31/February this team should be gelled and firing on all cylinders. Tough stretch beginning with Jan. 31 for sure but the timing is good, and the back end of the schedule looks very winnable. 

I'm thinking around 6 L's, and if we go 14-6 that's probably good to win the B1G, really. 13-7 would generally still be a good result, but shooting for 14-6 maybe 15-5 looks doable.

[Rico]

8 hours ago, IU Prof said:

I'm guessing the win total ends up closer to 11 than 17. 13-7 looks about right to me.

13-7 would disappoint me.

[Scotty R]

I am going with 14-6 and 10-1 in the non conference 

[HoosierHoopster]

49 minutes ago, Rico said:

13-7 would disappoint me.

Yeah I'm thinking 14-6 -- Always have the mindset that there are going to be a couple of those WTF losses, but then this team has the talent and depth to get those surprising W's as well. Here's to hoping.

[TheWatShot]

We spent like $2 million on this roster...I would sure hope we could do better than 13 and freaking 7. 

[go iu bb]

7 minutes ago, TheWatShot said:

We spent like $2 million on this roster...I would sure hope we could do better than 13 and freaking 7. 

I'm pretty sure much more than that was spent.

[str8baller]

5 hours ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:

Feel like 15-5 is reasonable with this group. And could/should be better than that. To me the floor should be 13-7. 11-9 won’t be pretty if that’s what it ends up. I’m quite confident it won’t.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners

We should go 10-1 non-conf so 11-9 would put us at 21 wins 10 losses pre conf tournament. I think that would have the natives restless. 
 

I would think 15-5 would have us with a share of the regular season title. But I’m guessing the regular season will be all kinds of wonky with these unbalanced schedules. 

[AZ Hoosier]

2 hours ago, TheWatShot said:

We spent like $2 million on this roster...I would sure hope we could do better than 13 and freaking 7. 

Well, we spent north of $4M on Woodson. (Insert your own joke here.)

[MikeRoberts]

2 hours ago, AZ Hoosier said:

Well, we spent north of $4M on Woodson. (Insert your own joke here.)

All in players & coaches were over 10 million