Transfer Portal w IU Interest

[Chris007 43,567]

42 minutes ago, BGVille Hoosierfan said:

Tyme blocked me on Twitter. A lot of speculation that is a burner for an assistant coach even though he says he works in the housing department at IU.

I promise he doesn’t work there. Not enough room for two know it alls.

[Uspshoosier 45,047]

 

[bird4par 218]

43 minutes ago, Schreckbagger said:

But it's fun to watch members of the Woodson Derangment Syndrome here squirm with any possibilities of his success.

Sent from my SM-S906U using BtownBanners mobile app
 

Mike Woodsons coaching ability makes bird4par squirm. 

[Muskie for three 307]

6 minutes ago, Uspshoosier said:

 

Looks like a young Luke Brown . 

[Artie86 1,866]

11 minutes ago, Uspshoosier said:

 

Man,….. if this works out, Rice and his type/style of play is going to be a welcomed site to this the IU team! He is smooth!

[Go_Hoosiers 191]

11 minutes ago, Uspshoosier said:

 

His jump shot looks fundamentally sound and he has a quick release. No reason to think he won't shoot it more efficiently next year.

[Dave from Dayton 2,964]

It's the age-old issue.  No coach has really had the players with the right skill set to employ in his scheme.

RMK, at the end, did not get his smart, team-oriented, ball players...until the Jeffries team which was too late.

Crean did not get the Dwayne pro or greyhound wing players.  But he did not realize that.

Archie didn't get his stellar guard that he needed.  That and long-limbed defensive oriented team players.

Woody has not gotten his outside-oriented ballers that can create and handle the ball. Where is that PG and SG and Sf?

It is tough to coach a team that doesn't fit.

 

[Schreckbagger 620]

Mike Woodsons coaching ability makes bird4par squirm. 

Try some Preparation H.....

 

Sent from my SM-S906U using BtownBanners mobile app

 

 

 

[Chris007 43,567]

34 minutes ago, Schreckbagger said:

Try some Preparation H.....

Sent from my SM-S906U using BtownBanners mobile app
 

Do you bring anything to the thread?  Who do you think Woodson gets next?

[Trish 11,505]

So what’s the big deal with this Rice kid? He’s shooting 28% from 3, (okay that’s Mike Woodson style I’ll give you that), he averages 3 turnovers a game, but puts up 15PPG in the worst power conference. 
 

He’s listed at 6’3”, that’s ideal. Can he defend? I’m too lazy to pull up Synergy. Indiana needs bodies I guess. 

[bird4par 218]

38 minutes ago, Schreckbagger said:

Try some Preparation H.....

 

Sent from my SM-S906U using BtownBanners mobile app

 

 

 

A gummy helps, but it is still miserable. 

[IUc2016 7,121]

1 minute ago, Trish said:

So what’s the big deal with this Rice kid? He’s shooting 28% from 3, (okay that’s Mike Woodson style I’ll give you that), he averages 3 turnovers a game, but puts up 15PPG in the worst power conference. 
 

He’s listed at 6’3”, that’s ideal. Can he defend? I’m too lazy to pull up Synergy. Indiana needs bodies I guess. 

PAC 12 freshman of the year. 1st team all league. 
 

His advanced analytics have been shared multiple times. He’s good, probably very good

[IU - Kaulie 1,891]

3 minutes ago, Chris007 said:

Do you bring anything to the thread?  Who do you think Woodson gets next?

Unfortunately, I think who he targets/prioritize and who he should target/prioritize are two very different things.

[Chris007 43,567]

11 minutes ago, IU - Kaulie said:

Unfortunately, I think who he targets/prioritize and who he should target/prioritize are two very different things.

I agree with that but Conwell has to be next. We need a shooter bad. But I wouldn’t be surprised if the Stanford kid is next. I don’t care what big man we get. I only like the Evansville kid 

[steubenhoosier 789]

17 minutes ago, Trish said:

So what’s the big deal with this Rice kid? He’s shooting 28% from 3, (okay that’s Mike Woodson style I’ll give you that), he averages 3 turnovers a game, but puts up 15PPG in the worst power conference. 
 

He’s listed at 6’3”, that’s ideal. Can he defend? I’m too lazy to pull up Synergy. Indiana needs bodies I guess. 

He did overcome cancer, so that might have something to do with those stats 

[IUCrazy2 2,341]

25 minutes ago, Chris007 said:

Do you bring anything to the thread?  Who do you think Woodson gets next?

I think the big guy from Arizona.

[Chris007 43,567]

2 minutes ago, IUCrazy2 said:

I think the big guy from Arizona.

I will get behind it if it happens but I’m hoping we get out bid by Kansas or UNC

[Uspshoosier 45,047]

8 minutes ago, Chris007 said:

I agree with that but Conwell has to be next. We need a shooter bad. But I wouldn’t be surprised if the Stanford kid is next. I don’t care what big man we get. I only like the Evansville kid 

Conwell, Evansville kid, whichever big comes first and Hickman along with Rice and we can wrap this thread up in a nice bow.  Leave last one open for a late add 

[Chris007 43,567]

4 minutes ago, Uspshoosier said:

Conwell, Evansville kid, whichever big comes first and Hickman along with Rice and we can wrap this thread up in a nice bow.  Leave last one open for a late add 

I would run naked through campus with excitement with that lineup. As I tell my wife don’t worry no one is going to see anything. 
 

No I’m all seriousness that’s a home run for the portal.

[RaceToTheTop 24,940]

3 hours ago, Chris007 said:

Also would add how will his numbers change when changing conferences. I don't follow the Pac-12 much but I tend to believe the defense is a little better in the BT

These are the posts I love because #1:  I don't know the answer and #2:  it allows me to try to geek the math and see if there is an answer.

Haven't put the numbers in (about to do so), but my gut says that the past season there was very little difference.  I also think if the difference was minor, you still can expect his numbers to improve next season because of the jump from being a freshman to a sophomore.

Now to run the numbers....

Ken Pom defensive ranks

Big Ten		Pac 12
Rutgers	5	Arizona	10
Michigan St	9	Washington St	26
Purdue	12	Utah	47
Maryland	14	Colorado	49
Nebraska	43	UCLA	50
Wisconsin	46	Arizona State	64
Northwestern	54	Oregon	70
Ohio St	63	USC	78
Illinois	80	Washington	100
Penn St	81	Stanford	128
Indiana	105	California	139
Minnesota	115	Oregon St	170
Iowa	157	AVERAGE	78
Michigan	182
AVERAGE	69

 

So on average, the Big Ten did rank higher in defensive efficiency that the Pac 12 -- but the difference was not that large (average of 69th in the Big Ten, average of 78 in Pac 12).  

Conversely, what might actually be a concern for numbers have a considerable drop should they come to IU would be transfers from the Missouri Valley Conference:

	MVC
Bradley	62
Drake	73
Missouri St	110
Indiana State	114
Northern Iowa	125
Belmont	130
UIC	135
Illinois St	142
S Illinois	145
Evansville	174
Murray St	188
Valparaiso	276
AVERAGE	140

 

Was interested to see that Indiana State ranked so low.....but having the 13th ranked offense made up for that.