Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, IndyHoops said:

He put up the same assist numbers in conference as Galloway. And let’s not forget he was in Iowa’s high tempo offense with some shooters. Mack did his work with much less talent around him.

Mack also has 3 years left…. Perkins is done after next year. Again, to me, it’s not close….

To each their own. I’d think you’d have to be mental to pass on a quality starting P5 PG. In a perfect world you get both.

Posted
35 minutes ago, IndyHoops said:

He put up the same assist numbers in conference as Galloway. And let’s not forget he was in Iowa’s high tempo offense with some shooters. Mack did his work with much less talent around him.

Mack also has 3 years left…. Perkins is done after next year. Again, to me, it’s not close….

Sure, take them both. But if you have to choose… Mack

Does it really make a difference. After a year under Woodson Mack would probably transfer anyway.

Posted
1 minute ago, Trish said:

Tony Perkins this past weekend vs a below average Utah team.

 

3, 3, and 4. 
 

29% from 3 and 78% from FT for the season. 
 

He’ll fit right in! 

Who’s your top target for that spot?

Posted
4 minutes ago, Trish said:

Tony Perkins this past weekend vs a below average Utah team.

 

3, 3, and 4. 
 

29% from 3 and 78% from FT for the season. 
 

He’ll fit right in! 

78% ft isn’t good enough?

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Stuhoo said:

78% ft isn’t good enough?

 

He’d probably instantly be the best free throw shooter on the team, no?

Posted
8 minutes ago, IndyHoops said:

Mack 

Mack is a super fun player and will likely be very good at a power five, but I’m partial to the guy that averaged 15 points a game against Big Ten defenses. And he’s a local kid. And he plays angry and defends and really rebounds considering his position.

If the same people who are calling for Malik Reneau to be our five think that we can have skinny, low, physicality guards, you’re asking for lousy roster construction again.

Posted
1 minute ago, Stuhoo said:

Mack is a super fun player and will likely be very good at the power, five level, but I’m partial to the guy that averaged 15 points a game against Big Ten defenses. and he’s a local kid. And he plays angry and defends and really rebounds considering his position.

If the same people who are calling for Malik Reneau to be our five think that we can have skinny, low, physicality guards, you’re asking for lousy roster construction again.

Mack’s size is a problem.

I think my biggest thing is Mack has 3 years left. 

Posted
Just now, Stuhoo said:

Mac is a super fun player, but I’m partial to the guy that averaged 15 points a game against Big Ten defenses. and he’s a local kid. And he plays angry and defends and really rebounds considering his position.

If the same people who are calling for Malik Reneau to be our five think that we can have skinny, low, physicality guards, you’re asking for lousy roster construction again.

Meh…I’d argue with Woody your defense is going to be pretty bad anyways. I’d rather throw up some points in a desperate attempt to be above average.  
 

Roster construction is relative. We’re always going to lack something with this staff. I think bringing in below average 3pt shooters to pair with Galloway is the epitome of bad roster construction. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, IndyHoops said:

Mack 

Yeah good choice however he won’t have free rein to shoot as much as he did against Ivy League competition in a power conference.   Every player is going to have bad games.  I watched Mack play over 30 min and shoot 2-11 (O-4 from 3) against a terrible Penn team.  Posting individual stats from 1 game is pointless in my opinion.    Both would be upgrades to what IU had or has.   

Posted
2 minutes ago, Stuhoo said:

Mack is a super fun player and will likely be very good at the power, five level, but I’m partial to the guy that averaged 15 points a game against Big Ten defenses. and he’s a local kid. And he plays angry and defends and really rebounds considering his position.

If the same people who are calling for Malik Reneau to be our five think that we can have skinny, low, physicality guards, you’re asking for lousy roster construction again.

My concern is adding Tucker & Perkins, keeping Galloway adds nothing to our 3 point shooting. Plus with Perkins it will take him a little bit get used to the college game. I know we will add other pieces but one will be a big man. 

Posted
1 minute ago, IndyHoops said:

Mack’s size is a problem.

I think my biggest thing is Mack has 3 years left. 

Love love, love, Mack

That doesn’t make Perkins any less of an outstanding pick up.

We are all counting our chickens before they’ve hatched. At this point I’m still hoping for one high-quality pick up. Then we’ll go from there.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...