Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

Banksyrules

Fire Coach Woodson Thread

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, mdiu28 said:

This infuriates me. 

Why, just why, can't we have an administration with some damn balls? Mike Woodson never deserved this job. I don't care what Archie Miller was given or what the optics are if we fire him now. Archie at least coached in the college arena with some success. All the coaches we could get are going to go elsewhere leaving IU even further behind. All in the name of optics. I'd argue the optics are worse if we keep Mike Woodson. Why can the admin not see this? If the inbreds in Lexington can figure it out, we can too.

If that actually happens, it will be a great example of what serious basketball school looks like. Assuming there is not some sort of negotiation and they straight up fire him, that would be the second largest NCAA coaching buyout in college football history. It is a staggering amount to move on from a basketball coach, much less one with his history at the school. And you can bet the farm they would throw some HUGE contracts at the usual suspects. Like nine figures-- and I don't care what anyone says about "not coaching" anymore or staying put, you start putting Alabama football HC numbers around, people are going to listen. Kentucky opening after the success Cal has had would be an absolute market resetting nightmare. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, mdiu28 said:

I never wanted to admit we aren't a serious program to myself but there's no other conclusion.

Get ready for more losses to Penn State and freaking Nebraska

Just look at the contrast in the school coomercials shown on B10 broadcasts.  The other schools show laboratories, while we show fat kids wandering around the campus.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Home Jersey said:

Seen Kentucky fans arguing on Twitter about keeping Calipari or not. Some say anybody can win at Kentucky. Others point out Gillespie couldn't and reference the fact from 99-until 2011 they didn't make a final four....

A 12 year stretch? Practically double that and I wonder how they'd be feeling. I'm resigned to the fact he's getting another year but man the unserious nature of our program is deflating when you're watching March Madness without the Hoosiers mens team. Love rooting for our ladies though.

Since he's here I'm hoping we "hit a grand slam" (eye roll) in the portal and they surprise me next year. That said, fire / retire Mike Woodson. Good grief.

The sad thing (for us) is that after 1999 and before 2011, they made 10 of 11 tournaments, won 5 conference championships, 4 conference tournaments, made 5 sweet 16s, and 3 elite 8s.

Imagine what they’d do after the last 12 years we’ve had if they view their 2000-2010 as a bad period. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, OKHOOSIER said:

If that actually happens, it will be a great example of what serious basketball school looks like. Assuming there is not some sort of negotiation and they straight up fire him, that would be the second largest NCAA coaching buyout in college football history. It is a staggering amount to move on from a basketball coach, much less one with his history at the school. And you can bet the farm they would throw some HUGE contracts at the usual suspects. Like nine figures-- and I don't care what anyone says about "not coaching" anymore or staying put, you start putting Alabama football HC numbers around, people are going to listen. Kentucky opening after the success Cal has had would be an absolute market resetting nightmare. 

I don't think they'll fire him unless they can get an Oats or a Drew which appears unlikely.  But they're considering it which says a lot with a $35M buyout.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just look at the contrast in the school coomercials shown on B10 broadcasts.  The other schools show laboratories, while we show fat kids wandering around the campus.

Winning > “holier than thou”
Business > Friendship/Relationships

Can you guess what school we are?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don’t think they are working hard to trash the program. In fact, had Woodson hit with DQ, LM and Boogie I think the board sentiment would be much different. But he did not hit. I think it just shows that the vision/expectations he had for recruiting missed in a big way and will probably sink him. But to suggest he is trying to sink it seems to be a stretch. 

If wishes and buts were candy and nuts, we’d all have a merry Christmas. Fland was always going to Kentucky. Queen was always going to Maryland. We had Liam until he saw what a train wreck Woodson’s team is, and he bailed.

Woodson may not be actively trying to tank the program, but he’s clearly too lazy and too full of himself to to anything else. And Buckner is standing guard over his boy protecting his “legacy”.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Kentuckysucks said:

Must be nice to have an administration that wants to win and is supportive of its AD.

 

 

In their case, they should be careful what they wish for.  There is no sure thing out there anymore.  I don't see a dominant mid aged coach out there right now and the whole portal thing has made it much easier for the other bigger schools to correct issues.

I hope they move on from Calipari because they are just as likely to end up in a churn and burn period like we have been as they are to pick someone that is making a Final Four run every few years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, 8bucks said:

 But didn’t he recruit pretty well at Vandy?  I know he got one we were after and I thought he had a couple more in that class. 

Looked at the rosters for his 3 Vanderbilt teams and the only name I recognize is Darius Garland 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
39 minutes ago, pumpfake said:

Just look at the contrast in the school coomercials shown on B10 broadcasts.  The other schools show laboratories, while we show fat kids wandering around the campus.

Is is me or does that dude have a very punchable face.  Sorry, just find the kid to be extremely annoying. 

Edited by HoosierMoore

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, IUCrazy2 said:

In their case, they should be careful what they wish for.  There is no sure thing out there anymore.  I don't see a dominant mid aged coach out there right now and the whole portal thing has made it much easier for the other bigger schools to correct issues.

I hope they move on from Calipari because they are just as likely to end up in a churn and burn period like we have been as they are to pick someone that is making a Final Four run every few years.

No they’re are not. 
 

There are no sure things. And there never was. Bob Knight wasn’t.  Pitino wasn’t. Tubby wasn’t. Gillispie wasn’t. Cal was probably as close as it gets and now he’s down.  
 

But they are typically pretty quick to recognize when it’s going south and pull the trigger. They also do a decent job getting quality candidates. That’s what most big time programs do and all you can ask for. They won’t go 25 years of mediocrity because it’s nearly impossible for any competent major program to do so. And they have proven themselves competent. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, IUCrazy2 said:

In their case, they should be careful what they wish for.  There is no sure thing out there anymore.  I don't see a dominant mid aged coach out there right now and the whole portal thing has made it much easier for the other bigger schools to correct issues.

I hope they move on from Calipari because they are just as likely to end up in a churn and burn period like we have been as they are to pick someone that is making a Final Four run every few years.

They'd be insanely stupid to move on unless they have Beard, Lloyd or Wright coming out of retirement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, steubenhoosier said:

Looked at the rosters for his 3 Vanderbilt teams and the only name I recognize is Darius Garland 

Shitu was a McDonalds all American as well and Neismith plays for the Pacers.  Even with Garland getting hurt they should have at least won a game in the SEC but went 0-18.    They had Drew micd up for a inside the huddle and it was possibly one of the worst I’ve ever listened to 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After the kid from Oakland hit 10-20 3's and they beat pUKe it made we wonder about how the tournament teams fared during the season on 3-point shooting.  We didn't have a roster of solid 3-point shooters but we also didn't run an offense designed to get open looks for 3-point shooters, i.e, our archaic "inside out" offense.  I compiled the 3-point shooting statistics for the 64 tournament teams.  Couple of teams played 1 or 2 more games than others but I don't think the overall data would be markedly different had I made allowances for exact number of games played.

First table is teams sorted by % made.  Second table # of 3's made.  Third table # of 3's attempted.  For each table, our data appears at the top.

    IU 166 513 32%
      Season 3PM Season 3PA % 
1 L Kentucky 318 772 41%
2 W PUke 275 674 41%
3 W Dayton 295 734 40%
4 W Northwestern 266 675 39%
5 W Colorado 234 594 39%
6 L Samford 335 852 39%
7 L McNeese 252 649 39%
8 W Baylor 279 719 39%
9 W Duke 267 708 38%
10 W Arizona 258 695 37%
11 L Stetson 310 837 37%
12 L Drake 295 804 37%
13 W UConn 299 815 37%
14 W Alabama 354 969 37%
15 L Nevada 220 603 36%
16 L Texas Tech 282 773 36%
17 W James Madison 298 817 36%
18 L So. Dakota St 290 799 36%
19 W Texas 237 654 36%
20 L Colgate 267 739 36%
21 W Creighton 339 939 36%
22 W Michigan St. 211 587 36%
23 W Marquette 301 840 36%
24 L Morehead St. 316 882 36%
25 L Nebraska 312 871 36%
26 L FAU 279 783 36%
27 L TCU 217 610 36%
28 L St. Mary's 251 708 35%
29 W North Carolina 270 763 35%
30 W Gonzaga 219 619 35%
31 W Clemson 267 755 35%
32 L Auburn 273 775 35%
33 W Oakland 291 829 35%
34 W Illinois 283 809 35%
35 W Iowa St. 222 637 35%
36 L BYU 370 1063 35%
37 L Wisconsin 248 713 35%
38 W Yale 225 648 35%
39 W Houston 262 756 35%
40 W NC State 254 733 35%
41 L Charleston 358 1039 34%
42 W Grand Canyon 238 691 34%
43 L Vermont 295 858 34%
44 L Longwood 198 577 34%
45 W Tennessee 279 816 34%
46 L Florida 269 787 34%
47 L Colorado St. 253 743 34%
48 L Western KY 225 662 34%
49 W Washington St. 211 621 34%
50 W Duquesne 267 786 34%
51 L Grambling 178 525 34%
52 W Oregon 249 741 34%
53 L So. Carolina 263 785 34%
54 L New Mexico 225 674 33%
55 W Utah St 209 632 33%
56 W Kansas 180 547 33%
57 L Akron 274 835 33%
58 L UAB 208 638 33%
59 L Miss. St. 245 754 32%
60 L Wagner 223 692 32%
61 L St. Peter's 188 586 32%
62 W San Diego St 236 755 31%
63 L Long Beach St 191 620 31%
64 W Texas A&M 234 823 28%

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
    IU 166    
      Season 3PM Season 3PA % 
1 L BYU 370 1063 35%
2 L Charleston 358 1039 34%
3 W Alabama 354 969 37%
4 W Creighton 339 939 36%
5 L Samford 335 852 39%
6 L Kentucky 318 772 41%
7 L Morehead St. 316 882 36%
8 L Nebraska 312 871 36%
9 L Stetson 310 837 37%
10 W Marquette 301 840 36%
11 W UConn 299 815 37%
12 W James Madison 298 817 36%
13 W Dayton 295 734 40%
14 L Drake 295 804 37%
15 L Vermont 295 858 34%
16 W Oakland 291 829 35%
17 L So. Dakota St 290 799 36%
18 W Illinois 283 809 35%
19 L Texas Tech 282 773 36%
20 W Baylor 279 719 39%
21 L FAU 279 783 36%
22 W Tennessee 279 816 34%
23 W PUke 275 674 41%
24 L Akron 274 835 33%
25 L Auburn 273 775 35%
26 W North Carolina 270 763 35%
27 L Florida 269 787 34%
28 W Duke 267 708 38%
29 L Colgate 267 739 36%
30 W Clemson 267 755 35%
31 W Duquesne 267 786 34%
32 W Northwestern 266 675 39%
33 L So. Carolina 263 785 34%
34 W Houston 262 756 35%
35 W Arizona 258 695 37%
36 W NC State 254 733 35%
37 L Colorado St. 253 743 34%
38 L McNeese 252 649 39%
39 L St. Mary's 251 708 35%
40 W Oregon 249 741 34%
41 L Wisconsin 248 713 35%
42 L Miss. St. 245 754 32%
43 W Grand Canyon 238 691 34%
44 W Texas 237 654 36%
45 W San Diego St 236 755 31%
46 W Colorado 234 594 39%
47 W Texas A&M 234 823 28%
48 W Yale 225 648 35%
49 L Western KY 225 662 34%
50 L New Mexico 225 674 33%
51 L Wagner 223 692 32%
52 W Iowa St. 222 637 35%
53 L Nevada 220 603 36%
54 W Gonzaga 219 619 35%
55 L TCU 217 610 36%
56 W Michigan St. 211 587 36%
57 W Washington St. 211 621 34%
58 W Utah St 209 632 33%
59 L UAB 208 638 33%
60 L Longwood 198 577 34%
61 L Long Beach St 191 620 31%
62 L St. Peter's 188 586 32%
63 W Kansas 180 547 33%
64 L Grambling 178 525 34%

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
    IU   513  
      Season 3PM Season 3PA % 
1 L BYU 370 1063 35%
2 L Charleston 358 1039 34%
3 W Alabama 354 969 37%
4 W Creighton 339 939 36%
5 L Morehead St. 316 882 36%
6 L Nebraska 312 871 36%
7 L Vermont 295 858 34%
8 L Samford 335 852 39%
9 W Marquette 301 840 36%
10 L Stetson 310 837 37%
11 L Akron 274 835 33%
12 W Oakland 291 829 35%
13 W Texas A&M 234 823 28%
14 W James Madison 298 817 36%
15 W Tennessee 279 816 34%
16 W UConn 299 815 37%
17 W Illinois 283 809 35%
18 L Drake 295 804 37%
19 L So. Dakota St 290 799 36%
20 L Florida 269 787 34%
21 W Duquesne 267 786 34%
22 L So. Carolina 263 785 34%
23 L FAU 279 783 36%
24 L Auburn 273 775 35%
25 L Texas Tech 282 773 36%
26 L Kentucky 318 772 41%
27 W North Carolina 270 763 35%
28 W Houston 262 756 35%
29 W Clemson 267 755 35%
30 W San Diego St 236 755 31%
31 L Miss. St. 245 754 32%
32 L Colorado St. 253 743 34%
33 W Oregon 249 741 34%
34 L Colgate 267 739 36%
35 W Dayton 295 734 40%
36 W NC State 254 733 35%
37 W Baylor 279 719 39%
38 L Wisconsin 248 713 35%
39 W Duke 267 708 38%
40 L St. Mary's 251 708 35%
41 W Arizona 258 695 37%
42 L Wagner 223 692 32%
43 W Grand Canyon 238 691 34%
44 W Northwestern 266 675 39%
45 W PUke 275 674 41%
46 L New Mexico 225 674 33%
47 L Western KY 225 662 34%
48 W Texas 237 654 36%
49 L McNeese 252 649 39%
50 W Yale 225 648 35%
51 L UAB 208 638 33%
52 W Iowa St. 222 637 35%
53 W Utah St 209 632 33%
54 W Washington St. 211 621 34%
55 L Long Beach St 191 620 31%
56 W Gonzaga 219 619 35%
57 L TCU 217 610 36%
58 L Nevada 220 603 36%
59 W Colorado 234 594 39%
60 W Michigan St. 211 587 36%
61 L St. Peter's 188 586 32%
62 L Longwood 198 577 34%
63 W Kansas 180 547 33%
64 L Grambling 178 525 34%

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Class of '66 Old Fart said:

After the kid from Oakland hit 10-20 3's and they beat pUKe it made we wonder about how the tournament teams fared during the season on 3-point shooting.  We didn't have a roster of solid 3-point shooters but we also didn't run an offense designed to get open looks for 3-point shooters, i.e, our archaic "inside out" offense.  I compiled the 3-point shooting statistics for the 64 tournament teams.  Couple of teams played 1 or 2 more games than others but I don't think the overall data would be markedly different had I made allowances for exact number of games played.

First table is teams sorted by % made.  Second table # of 3's made.  Third table # of 3's attempted.  For each table, our data appears at the top.

    IU 166 513 32%
      Season 3PM Season 3PA % 
1 L Kentucky 318 772 41%
2 W PUke 275 674 41%
3 W Dayton 295 734 40%
4 W Northwestern 266 675 39%
5 W Colorado 234 594 39%
6 L Samford 335 852 39%
7 L McNeese 252 649 39%
8 W Baylor 279 719 39%
9 W Duke 267 708 38%
10 W Arizona 258 695 37%
11 L Stetson 310 837 37%
12 L Drake 295 804 37%
13 W UConn 299 815 37%
14 W Alabama 354 969 37%
15 L Nevada 220 603 36%
16 L Texas Tech 282 773 36%
17 W James Madison 298 817 36%
18 L So. Dakota St 290 799 36%
19 W Texas 237 654 36%
20 L Colgate 267 739 36%
21 W Creighton 339 939 36%
22 W Michigan St. 211 587 36%
23 W Marquette 301 840 36%
24 L Morehead St. 316 882 36%
25 L Nebraska 312 871 36%
26 L FAU 279 783 36%
27 L TCU 217 610 36%
28 L St. Mary's 251 708 35%
29 W North Carolina 270 763 35%
30 W Gonzaga 219 619 35%
31 W Clemson 267 755 35%
32 L Auburn 273 775 35%
33 W Oakland 291 829 35%
34 W Illinois 283 809 35%
35 W Iowa St. 222 637 35%
36 L BYU 370 1063 35%
37 L Wisconsin 248 713 35%
38 W Yale 225 648 35%
39 W Houston 262 756 35%
40 W NC State 254 733 35%
41 L Charleston 358 1039 34%
42 W Grand Canyon 238 691 34%
43 L Vermont 295 858 34%
44 L Longwood 198 577 34%
45 W Tennessee 279 816 34%
46 L Florida 269 787 34%
47 L Colorado St. 253 743 34%
48 L Western KY 225 662 34%
49 W Washington St. 211 621 34%
50 W Duquesne 267 786 34%
51 L Grambling 178 525 34%
52 W Oregon 249 741 34%
53 L So. Carolina 263 785 34%
54 L New Mexico 225 674 33%
55 W Utah St 209 632 33%
56 W Kansas 180 547 33%
57 L Akron 274 835 33%
58 L UAB 208 638 33%
59 L Miss. St. 245 754 32%
60 L Wagner 223 692 32%
61 L St. Peter's 188 586 32%
62 W San Diego St 236 755 31%
63 L Long Beach St 191 620 31%
64 W Texas A&M 234 823 28%

I am not a smart man, nor am I a "numbers guy." However, based on my rudimentary understanding of mathematics, it would appear we are Grambling State. 

In all seriousness, this is a pretty amazing data set, and to see just how far we are from the UCONNs and Arizona's of the world. You are doing the Lord's work. Feels like you could juxtapose this over guard/wing commitments over the last three years of recruiting and find some trends...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Class of '66 Old Fart said:

First table is teams sorted by % made.  Second table # of 3's made.  Third table # of 3's attempted.  For each table, our data appears at the top.

If you go to a site like torvik you can get it as a percentage of a teams shots which is more pace neutral. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Kentuckysucks said:

Must be nice to have an administration that wants to win and is supportive of its AD.

 

 

Can we print a massive amount of these screenshots and mail them to various pertinent administration employees repetitively over the course of many weeks? Months? 

"The rivals care. So should you."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, str8baller said:

No they’re are not. 
 

There are no sure things. And there never was. Bob Knight wasn’t.  Pitino wasn’t. Tubby wasn’t. Gillispie wasn’t. Cal was probably as close as it gets and now he’s down.  
 

But they are typically pretty quick to recognize when it’s going south and pull the trigger. They also do a decent job getting quality candidates. That’s what most big time programs do and all you can ask for. They won’t go 25 years of mediocrity because it’s nearly impossible for any competent major program to do so. And they have proven themselves competent. 

Maybe not as bad as us but I think the blue blood days are about over.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×