Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
57 minutes ago, Ngw7183 said:

You seem to be sure that it is system and not roster. Have said many times he owns that and failed this year. Just don’t believe his “system” is as big of issue as some. Especially not offense. defense I could get behind. Mainly because it just seems too hard for guys to understand and pickup. 
 

with right guys, some of this goes away. 

So let me ask this. If we get Queen do you want us to start Queen, Reneau, MM, and McNeely next year? If we don't get Queen and since we're losing Ware do you think we should go to the portal for another big man?

It sounds like you're saying you don't mind playing the two big guys with a big wing with them. I think McNeely is going to be much better than Mgbako was as a freshman. I still want both of them on the team. I would start both of them together with Reneau and bring Queen off the bench. I will say from what I have seen already that Queen handles the ball better than Ware and Reneau. Maybe even Mgbako too

Posted
5 minutes ago, Ngw7183 said:

Well…. Lot of questions there 

first - ideally 2 new starting guards. One true point guard and one dynamic shooting guard. Nothing else matters until that is right. Trey is off bench. Both from portal unless a JHS caliber becomes available.

As far as rotations and who plays where - the MM situation has to play out first. If he isn’t here, pretty simple. Queen, Malik, McNeely. I think that is the most likely situation and yes, I would be 100% good with the 2 bigs with the proper guard play. To your point, Queen handles well and Malik is improving a lot there and hoping for another jump.

Like it or not, as I started a new post on that didn’t get much interest (guess complaining about 20 year old hiring mistakes and admin issues is more fun) - the Big Ten almost forces some of this. If you try and go small, it is very hard to do successfully. Few teams have tried and not great success. The 2 bigs can work fine with guards who can hit shots, create, etc. Purdue is just one example. 

now, if MM is back as well, great problem to have. Good teams have abundance of talent and you don’t stop recruiting guys like Queen because we have enough there and need guards (see silly stuff like that all the time from fans).  In that case, practice work sorts some of it, you can play a variety of rotations and do different things based on matchups. 
 

I will say, McNeely from an offensive perspective does have some 2 guard in him. Put it this way, he is as much a 2 guard as Trey is. He can handle well and his passing is very good. They ran him almost at point down the stretch few weeks ago in that down to the wire game. Gave him the ball and let him decide.  So option there with the right point to play really big at times. 

Ultimately, yes, I firmly believe fans are too caught up in the 2 big worries. Our issue has been guard play. The one year where we had just 1 top level guard, many of the advanced stats looked way better. Imagine if we had 2 of them. 

 

Thank you and I tend to agree. I don't mind the two big guys but as long as the spacing is good. I'm a 4 out 1 in or 5 out guy so we can take advantage of our mismatches

Posted
25 minutes ago, Ngw7183 said:

Well…. Lot of questions there 

first - ideally 2 new starting guards. One true point guard and one dynamic shooting guard. Nothing else matters until that is right. Trey is off bench. Both from portal unless a JHS caliber becomes available.

As far as rotations and who plays where - the MM situation has to play out first. If he isn’t here, pretty simple. Queen, Malik, McNeely. I think that is the most likely situation and yes, I would be 100% good with the 2 bigs with the proper guard play. To your point, Queen handles well and Malik is improving a lot there and hoping for another jump.

Like it or not, as I started a new post on that didn’t get much interest (guess complaining about 20 year old hiring mistakes and admin issues is more fun) - the Big Ten almost forces some of this. If you try and go small, it is very hard to do successfully. Few teams have tried and not great success. The 2 bigs can work fine with guards who can hit shots, create, etc. Purdue is just one example. 

now, if MM is back as well, great problem to have. Good teams have abundance of talent and you don’t stop recruiting guys like Queen because we have enough there and need guards (see silly stuff like that all the time from fans).  In that case, practice work sorts some of it, you can play a variety of rotations and do different things based on matchups. 
 

I will say, McNeely from an offensive perspective does have some 2 guard in him. Put it this way, he is as much a 2 guard as Trey is. He can handle well and his passing is very good. They ran him almost at point down the stretch few weeks ago in that down to the wire game. Gave him the ball and let him decide.  So option there with the right point to play really big at times. 

Ultimately, yes, I firmly believe fans are too caught up in the 2 big worries. Our issue has been guard play. The one year where we had just 1 top level guard, many of the advanced stats looked way better. Imagine if we had 2 of them. 

 

At Montverde he plays the 2

Posted
37 minutes ago, Chris007 said:

I think it's been conveyed to IU by Ware and his people that he was leaving for the NBA for a little while now. 

During the pre season press conferences both Ware and MM said the plan is to he here one year. Mainly brought this up because that Queen is looking at you stays or goes before he makes his decision

Posted

I can’t figure out why we haven’t offered him yet!  We need a point guard and he’s the best available.  Weren’t we recruiting Curtis Givens and Davis is ranked higher than him

Posted
5 minutes ago, IUFAN1976 said:

I can’t figure out why we haven’t offered him yet!  We need a point guard and he’s the best available.  Weren’t we recruiting Curtis Givens and Davis is ranked higher than him

There's a wart somewhere with Davis and after Woody didn't bother to stay for his game last night, pretty clear he's off our radar.

Posted
30 minutes ago, Hoosierfan2017 said:

Why do folks think that Vonleh shut it down?

There’s some Mandela Effect going on with Vonleh because I would’ve bet a lot of money that he shut it down that season. And I was even at the BTT game against Illinois where he played. So weird. 

Obviously he didn’t, but I do remember something about a foot injury late that season. It must have just been something like Ware, in that he’s hurt and some assume he’ll be done. Funny enough, that team was eerily similar to this one.

Posted
9 hours ago, Hovadipo said:

There’s some Mandela Effect going on with Vonleh because I would’ve bet a lot of money that he shut it down that season. And I was even at the BTT game against Illinois where he played. So weird. 

Obviously he didn’t, but I do remember something about a foot injury late that season. It must have just been something like Ware, in that he’s hurt and some assume he’ll be done. Funny enough, that team was eerily similar to this one.

Yeah he had a foot injury, missed two games toward the end of the regular season, and then played the last two games. 

Talk about a team full of knuckleheads. Vonleh was nice from the times I met him, though. 

Posted

I believe it was only one game Vonleh sat out, much to the dismay of fans. A lot of fans speculated that he was preserving his draft stock.

Going off memory here, but I think it was an Ohio State home game and Hanner Perea played pretty well, indicating he'd be ready to shoulder more minutes in the future front court when Vonleh left.

Ha.

Posted
3 hours ago, AKHoosier said:

I believe it was only one game Vonleh sat out, much to the dismay of fans. A lot of fans speculated that he was preserving his draft stock.

Going off memory here, but I think it was an Ohio State home game and Hanner Perea played pretty well, indicating he'd be ready to shoulder more minutes in the future front court when Vonleh left.

Ha.

Hanner didn't even start that game. Hartman and Williams started at the 4 and 5. Along with Yogi, Sheehey and maybe Gordon.

Edit: Starters that game were Yogi, Sheehey, Williams, Etheringron, Hollowell

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...