Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

iubb

Mike Woodson to be next IUBB coach. Thad Matta to be associate AD

Recommended Posts

What an incredible change in climate in comparison to 3 weeks ago for us IUBB fans. I was admittedly less than thrilled originally, but my cup is overflowing now. Any word as to which young men we might be continuing to target for the last open scholarship?
I wasn't enamored with the hire, but I also wasn't disappointed. I love what I have seen so far.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Stuhoo said:

 

I encourage y’all to look back to page one of this thread. There were many who saw the upside, some who had other hopes but an open mind, and a few ...others.

 

He definitely wasn’t my first choice, but I was open to the hire. Now I’m wondering why we didn’t hire him instead of Crean 13 years ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Stuhoo said:

 

I encourage y’all to look back to page one of this thread. There were many who saw the upside, some who had other hopes but an open mind, and a few ...others.

 

I was on the Brad train and even though we did not get him I am glad we seemingly exhausted that opportunity.  Once we got to our next option I was not thinking of Woodson much tbh but I did post once that part of me wanted us to hire Fife or Lewis and then build the best staff, development and basketball program in the country.  Use that $ for assistants and other developmental staff to make sure our chances of success this time around were significantly better.  Go outside the standard if needed but spend that Brad money and build it.

Then when the Woodson news started to break, a week or so before the Matta thing, I started to look into this option more and started to think maybe I should replace Fife and Lewis with Woody.  

I had a strong tip that he was in discussions about a week or so before the official news broke that he was hired but it did not seem to fit with the rest of the news from this board and a few other places so I was not sure what to make of it.  I was hopeful though that if he came he could build a monster...but there was certainly some doubt.  I did not hear about Matta though till the news broke on Woody and all of a sudden the possibilities seemed huge and as @kottke said, why did we not do this before Crean. 

Since he was hired, it just seems to get better and better.  Matta, TJD coming back, Lander Back, Kenya Hunter stays, Parker stays, Gonzaga does not go undefeated, Fife, X commits, Race is back, Yasir hired, Bates commits - am i missing something?

Seems whenever we lose someone, we replace with a better guy or one with potential to be better. 

We have one more spot to fill.  He could probably bring in anyone and the overall transition from Arch to Woody has been a huge success in stage 1.  The next stages (can Race and TJD develop outside shots, does Rob find his mojo, can Woody's plan be explained, taught and then be successful in college) we don't get to see or judge until we hit the court.  Until then, it certainly seems as if we should not have to worry about a multi year rebuild.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Stuhoo said:

 

I encourage y’all to look back to page one of this thread. There were many who saw the upside, some who had other hopes but an open mind, and a few ...others.

 

Things are fun now but we still haven’t started the games yet.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Stuhoo said:

I was very, very, extremely excited, satisfied, and optimistic about the hire!

Therefore, for me so far it’s about average results.       ;)

I like to check my sources. What did you think of Archie during his tenure?  Are there posters who saw what a disaster he was early, then also thought Woodson was a good hire?  Those are the ones I want to follow.  :92:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Stuhoo said:

 

^You were understandably wondering about this on hiring day^

Answer:

Yes. 
He can land top 10-20 classes.

And yes. 
On most nights, including during B1G conference play, our guys will just be better than our opponent’s.

It took him about three weeks to definitively establish that.

 

 

I can't wait to see what he can do in a full recruiting cycle. He's been here less than a month and already blown me away. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I can't wait to see what he can do in a full recruiting cycle. He's been here less than a month and already blown me away. 

I’m excited to see the potential. The Bates commitment and the offers so far are incredibly intriguing.

I guess I don’t have to be a fair weather fan afterall. Thank goodness. Im already all in. I will be very critical of the product, as you all already know. Lol


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Stuhoo said:

 

Fizdale: "If you don't like Woody there's something wrong with you ... he made it so fun, and we kept getting better. He just one of the coolest guys who's extremely innovative and thoughtful." 

 

So National Champions after Woody’s 2nd year? Count me in!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Stuhoo said:

 

Fizdale: "If you don't like Woody there's something wrong with you ... he made it so fun, and we kept getting better. He just one of the coolest guys who's extremely innovative and thoughtful... "

(Later talking about Josh Smith, the most difficult player to coach Fizdale has ever met): "(Woody) has the incredible ability to move on. To get over it. (He) keeps his own ego out of it and has the incredible ability to come back the next day and say c'mon kid let's get back to work." 

 

So Josh Smith was incredibly difficult to coach? Can you imagine if he had ended up at IU and Mike Davis trying coach the uncoachable? I just can't imagine Davis doing well with him. Probably better for both that it never happened.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×