Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 minutes ago, Hoosierfan2017 said:

One thing that’s a lock is this - IU is a textbook example against expanding the tournament. If this putrid team has a chance there’s no reason to add even more teams. 

This is exactly true. I saw somewhere that Pitt (17-15, #72 in Torvik) would be one of the Bubble teams this year if the tournament expanded as is being proposed...

Posted
6 minutes ago, lillurk said:

I don’t like my team playing in the First Four but 1) that’s what this team deserves and 2) it opens the possibility of knowing the next head coach a little bit sooner (though that would require a loss, which I won’t root for).

No worries... I gotcha...

Posted

As athletic as Oregon looked in comparison to IU today, I'm watching the Ole Miss vs Arkansas game. These players are a whole different level of athlete. 

It's just a reminder of whoever IU chooses as their next coach has to be able to recruit at a really high level. Woody might have had a large NIL warchest, but IU did not put a great athletic lineup on the floor from it. 

Posted

The out of left field comment is interesting. Because what’s out of left field to people who can’t hit refresh here fast enough is a lot different from fans who just watch TV sports shows. If it is someone who hasn’t been mentioned in this thread, that would truly be way, way out of left field. 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...