Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, AZ Hoosier said:

the wife is hot... and apparently, it runs in the family... both of her sisters are... 

We are not the same.  I am very happy with my wife and her looks.  But she has 2 sisters that I would never describe as even close to hot.  And they are a major pain in my backside!  

Posted
1 minute ago, AZ Hoosier said:

the wife is hot... and apparently, it runs in the family... both of her sisters are... 

We are not the same.  I am very happy with my wife and her looks.  But she has 2 sisters that I would never describe as even close to hot.  And they are a major pain in my backside!  

Posted
No. I’m saying you can’t simultaneously argue that the reason there are no leaks is because the NDAs are likely ironclad but then also imply you’re somehow in the know. 
But you can...not everyone follows what they sign. However, having an NDA would definitely slow the flow of information.
Posted
2 minutes ago, TadQueasy said:

We are not the same.  I am very happy with my wife and her looks.  But she has 2 sisters that I would never describe as even close to hot.  And they are a major pain in my backside!  

 

1 minute ago, TadQueasy said:

We are not the same.  I am very happy with my wife and her looks.  But she has 2 sisters that I would never describe as even close to hot.  And they are a major pain in my backside!  

A post so nice, you made it twice. LOL.

VBG

Posted
7 minutes ago, Truthhurts said:

No. I’m saying you can’t simultaneously argue that the reason there are no leaks is because the NDAs are likely ironclad but then also imply you’re somehow in the know. 

Yeah, it seems like if there are either NDAs in place then any info is unreliable.

But I doubt that they are using NDAs. I'd expect Dolson is just sharing info on a need to know basis among people he trusts.

Posted
5 minutes ago, HoosierInParadise said:
10 minutes ago, Truthhurts said:
No. I’m saying you can’t simultaneously argue that the reason there are no leaks is because the NDAs are likely ironclad but then also imply you’re somehow in the know. 

But you can...not everyone follows what they sign. However, having an NDA would definitely slow the flow of information.

Yes, that is true. But you’re misunderstanding my point. 

Posted
11 minutes ago, TadQueasy said:

We are not the same.  I am very happy with my wife and her looks.  But she has 2 sisters that I would never describe as even close to hot.  And they are a major pain in my backside!  

Ahhh Tad, beauty is only a light switch away, & the worst I ever had was still wonderful…

Posted
10 minutes ago, the_jackal said:

Yes, we were in deep talks until Drew got promises of more NIL at Baylor. funny that you responded to my DM saying everything you've heard from those you trust around campus is it will be Drew too. 

I gave 5 names, Stevens (don't refute we inquired, but he directly said NO again), Drew (mutual interest til there wasn't), Otz (mutual interest til there wasn't), Mccollum (speaking to him now), and Beard (fully vetted and said no to him). We don't have a coach signed yet. I don't know who the next coach will be at this hour because no coach has been selected by Scott. 

Since it's known the 5 coaches i mentioned had or since have been spoken to/vetted, would love for someone to tell me where exactly my info was wrong at the time. It appears my info has been the only credible info provided to this board in weeks, which was Scott's original list of names

- Jackal

Yes Baylor is going to have $10m in NIL next year even if IU promised Drew $7m it’s hard to get up to $10m

Posted
10 minutes ago, the_jackal said:

Yes, we were in deep talks until Drew got promises of more NIL at Baylor. funny that you responded to my DM saying everything you've heard from those you trust around campus is it will be Drew too. 

I gave 5 names, Stevens (don't refute we inquired, but he directly said NO again), Drew (mutual interest til there wasn't), Otz (mutual interest til there wasn't), Mccollum (speaking to him now), and Beard (fully vetted and said no to him). We don't have a coach signed yet. I don't know who the next coach will be at this hour because no coach has been selected by Scott. 

Since it's known the 5 coaches i mentioned had or since have been spoken to/vetted, would love for someone to tell me where exactly my info was wrong at the time. It appears my info has been the only credible info provided to this board in weeks, which was Scott's original list of names

- Jackal

Here’s the problem with the “inside” information. Everything you said about the coaches has been seen on multiple social media platforms. Maybe you were the first. That’s not my point. My point is, you say these things as if they are fact. And maybe they are. But given you haven’t said anything many, many other people have said, it tells me that either lots of people actually know what’s going on, or almost no one does. I’m guessing, no one does.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...