Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, HinnyHoosier said:

That’s a pretty good read. I’ve heard that recording a hundred times. I got a kick out of the former players who play it for their HS aged kids. 

Posted
10 hours ago, IUCrazy2 said:

The whole fan argument is garbage.  Go take a look at Purdue social media today.

 

This in the middle of one of the best runs in the history of their program.  Fans are not the biggest problem, fans are fans.  When you are losing it just highlights the biggest losers in a fanbase.  So I don't completely dismiss that some guys are turned off by our wackos.  But the wackos weren't the problem, the losing was. The problem has always been picking the wrong guys to be in charge.

What did it say? It disappears when I click on it. 

Posted
13 minutes ago, TheWatShot said:

What did it say? It disappears when I click on it. 

It was a quote tweet of Loyer blowing a tire and airballing it saying that the sooner he graduates the better.

Posted
Just now, TheWatShot said:

Purdue starts 2 true seniors and a super senior. If they make any kind of run in March, I wonder if the media will hyper-fixate on how their average age is older than some NBA teams. 

That will never happen. It only happens for Indiana football because the media cannot accept that we got a great coach who knows how to build, motivate and coach a team. Everyone else will get a pass.

Posted
1 hour ago, Brass Cannon said:

Looking at Purdue they might be in trouble next year.  They lose a lot of contributors. And even if Painter wants to reload in the portal assuming he can his system has always benefitted from guys playing multiple seasons. 
 

I’m not saying they will suck. But their window to win a NC might have already closed.  

The school with 0 NC’s in anything ain’t winning one.

Posted
2 hours ago, Brass Cannon said:

Looking at Purdue they might be in trouble next year.  They lose a lot of contributors. And even if Painter wants to reload in the portal assuming he can his system has always benefitted from guys playing multiple seasons. 
 

I’m not saying they will suck. But their window to win a NC might have already closed.  

Yep, without Smith & Kaufman they are a team of role players. Pretty average role players actually.

Posted
4 hours ago, Kentuckysucks said:

Can't read the article but if it's the rant I'm thinking of it was at practice not a half time.

Oh that's right. I'd forgotten it was a practice but always imagined some of Bob's best halftime rants came during Purdoo games. 

Posted
11 hours ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:

Really?  Zero chance in my mind.  They will have a good team again even if they have a drop off. He’s young and near the top.  

You may be right. 
However…… He’s continuing to be  a "mediocre in-game coach" prone to "tournament failure." Sounds “whiny” after IU loss.

Patience with him may be running thin.

Posted
22 minutes ago, Whoozhers said:

You may be right. 
However…… He’s continuing to be  a "mediocre in-game coach" prone to "tournament failure." Sounds “whiny” after IU loss.

Patients with him may be running thin.

Oh my, I’ve seen it all now.

Posted

Put me in the I don't think Matt is going anywhere camp.  I'd guess he coaches another 15 years.  He's one of those sort of guys.

He's very good I've got to admit.  His track record except a couple years (a recruiting philosophy mistake he corrected) has been pretty darn good.

I just want to see them not be a title threat.

I'm curious how things will go as they fully get into the NIL era.  It feels like it's been delayed due to Edey, who was the ultimate crutch -- a 2x NPOY that PU was paying maybe 1/3 of what he was worth.  And also this year they really passed the hat to go all-in on their seniors and keep everyone and get Cluff.  They're probably spending as much or more than we are on our roster this year.

Hopefully next year they actually slow down.  They lose their top four scorers and PU's NIL isn't great, and they'll have to figure out how to spend between reloading MBB and trying to fix their FB problems.

That said, as long as Matt is there, I expect them to be pretty good.  There is no denying he is a very good coach.

Posted

I dunno, a starting lineup of Cox, Benter, Mayer, Jacobsen, and Harris seems like even though it's full of fairly proven commodities, it will be 'just okay', but not necessarily top half of the B1G. Benter is probably the single upside/most potentially valuable player from that group. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Whoozhers said:

You may be right. 
However…… He’s continuing to be  a "mediocre in-game coach" prone to "tournament failure." Sounds “whiny” after IU loss.

Patients with him may be running thin.

We all have family and friends that are Purdue fans.  All I have heard from my Purdue fan is bellyaching about Painter not winning the tournament.  I heard their whining for the past 10 + years. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...