Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 minutes ago, Hoosierfan2017 said:

One thing that’s a lock is this - IU is a textbook example against expanding the tournament. If this putrid team has a chance there’s no reason to add even more teams. 

This is exactly true. I saw somewhere that Pitt (17-15, #72 in Torvik) would be one of the Bubble teams this year if the tournament expanded as is being proposed...

Posted
6 minutes ago, lillurk said:

I don’t like my team playing in the First Four but 1) that’s what this team deserves and 2) it opens the possibility of knowing the next head coach a little bit sooner (though that would require a loss, which I won’t root for).

No worries... I gotcha...

Posted

As athletic as Oregon looked in comparison to IU today, I'm watching the Ole Miss vs Arkansas game. These players are a whole different level of athlete. 

It's just a reminder of whoever IU chooses as their next coach has to be able to recruit at a really high level. Woody might have had a large NIL warchest, but IU did not put a great athletic lineup on the floor from it. 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...