Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
16 minutes ago, Stuhoo said:

 

  • Phinisee
  • Green
  • Hunter
  • TJD
  • Davis/Brunk

Smith, Durham, Davis/Brunk off the bench.  Hmmmmm.....

 

Yeah. Hunter’s length and skill set creates so much lineup flexibility. Anything from a giant 2 with Phinisee, Smith, TJD and Davis to a small ball 5 in a high pressure lineup with Phinisee, Green, Durham and Smith. The matchup possibilities are just plain cool.

Posted
15 minutes ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:

Stuhoo’s projected lineup is the lineup that gives me hope. I think that lineup could be pretty slick if Devonte and Phin and shoot around 40% from three.




Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

 

Remember; they're moving the three point line back about a foot and a half this year. Anyone with extended usage and over about 37% will be quite good. 40% with a lot of attempts will be nationally notable.

The NIT the past year used the new extended line:

"The 3-point shooting percentage of teams in the 2019 NIT was 33%, compared with their regular season average of 35.2%.Jun 6, 2019"

 

Posted

After the shell shock of the past several seasons, a healthy dose of skepticism is warranted. However, I see a team with tremendous growth potential and one that can begin to build the continuity we've been missing. I really like the guys we are recruiting and what they can bring. Last year everything that could go wrong went wrong. I don't think anyone on the team wants to go through that again. This group has the potential, and I think they will, to be greater than the some of the parts. I'm not an overly optimistic person, just ask my wife! But I think the coming season is going to be a lot of fun.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Stuhoo said:

 

Remember; they're moving the three point line back about a foot and a half this year. Anyone with extended usage and over about 37% will be quite good. 40% with a lot of attempts will be nationally notable.

The NIT the past year used the new extended line:

"The 3-point shooting percentage of teams in the 2019 NIT was 33%, compared with their regular season average of 35.2%.Jun 6, 2019"

 

On the flip side the pack line might suffer because the change 

Posted
10 minutes ago, Brass Cannon said:

On the flip side the pack line might suffer because the change 

 

I'm not sure that's true, but I see your point. The packline is susceptible to skip passes and long distance shooting. I suppose further expanding offensive spacing will be bad for packline teams. However, I think it's more likely that reduced shooting percentages from three will make teams focus more on interior offense, and that's where the packline thrives. 

 

Posted
18 minutes ago, Stuhoo said:

 

I'm not sure that's true, but I see your point. The packline is susceptible to skip passes and long distance shooting. I suppose further expanding offensive spacing will be bad for packline teams. However, I think it's more likely that reduced shooting percentages from three will make teams focus more on interior offense, and that's where the packline thrives. 

 

In the short term you are probably right but as shooting percentages rise as they surely will Archie may have to make adjustments. There’s a reason the pack line was pretty much a college system. 

EDIT 

Part of me wonders if we will see more college coaches adding NBA guys to their staffs for this reason. 

Posted
11 minutes ago, Brass Cannon said:

In the short term you are probably right but as shooting percentages rise as they surely will Archie may have to make adjustments. There’s a reason the pack line was pretty much a college system. 

I really think that the degree of success CAM has will depend on his ability to tweak his offensive and defensive systems. I believe this will be a big part of his growth process. The last two years have to have been humbling for a person as competitive as he is reported to be. Rigidity is not your friend at this level.

Posted
2 hours ago, Stuhoo said:

 

  • Phinisee
  • Green
  • Hunter
  • TJD
  • Davis/Brunk

Smith, Durham, Davis/Brunk off the bench.  Hmmmmm.....

 

Archie seems unwilling to take Smith out of the lineup.  I'd guess he gets the start over Hunter

Posted
4 minutes ago, Brass Cannon said:

Who are you referring to as an option?

You know our roster from last season.  You didn't find Smith's starts and minutes odd based upon his production?

Posted
Just now, Josh said:

You know our roster from last season.  You didn't find Smith's starts and minutes odd based upon his production?

And who was a better option for those minutes?  Seems you won’t answer that? 

Fitzner?Jake and Moore who already had a foot out the door? Race who was concussed most of the year?  Damezi?  

Who didn’t play meaningful minutes that could have taken Smiths?

Posted
16 minutes ago, Brass Cannon said:

And who was a better option for those minutes?  Seems you won’t answer that? 

Fitzner?Jake and Moore who already had a foot out the door? Race who was concussed most of the year?  Damezi?  

Who didn’t play meaningful minutes that could have taken Smiths?

I think you use the bench to motivate.  I would have liked to see Jake eat a lot of Smith's minutes.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...