Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, LIHoosier said:

I guess Iowa St wearing Penn St uniforms doesn't make them the 4th-5th best team in the B1G. If Campbell and co. stayed at Iowa St, they probably would've been projected 4th-5th in the Big XII this year.

Too lazy to look. I assume he is getting paid more now? i guess with Penn State's resources he will eventually get actual Big Ten talent. But this is a big yikes

Posted
3 minutes ago, KingPG21 said:

lol. They brought in Matt Campbell cause literally everyone else told them no

He averaged 7.2 wins a season the last 10 years.  You can’t promote a guy to the big leagues and expect to him to win more. I’m sorry that’s silly. Yes you get more resources but so does your competition. 
 

Same logic applies to Michigan 

Posted
5 hours ago, KingPG21 said:

Too lazy to look. I assume he is getting paid more now? i guess with Penn State's resources he will eventually get actual Big Ten talent. But this is a big yikes

I actually couldn’t believe they were favored. They looked bad last week versus a mediocre Wisconsin team.  
 

Hard to sit here and defend Franklin on a night he screwed the pooch, but PSU has only gotten worse since his firing.  Their best game since firing him is probably playing IU close in a loss. 

Posted
7 hours ago, Demo said:

Personally, I’m good with 12. I like the top 4 getting a bye. I get the argument for 16 and I’m ok with it as long as the 1st round games are on campus so again there’s some benefit to being a high seed. 24’s just too many for the obvious  reason that there is no universe where a team seeded, say, 20-24 is gonna win 5 games and win the Natty. Not a chance. The depth of talent between football and basketball is just too different for a football team to do that while a basketball team could.

Since you posted this 4 times are we to assume you favor a 48-team event?  Asking for a friend.

Posted
2 hours ago, str8baller said:

I actually couldn’t believe they were favored. They looked bad last week versus a mediocre Wisconsin team.  
 

Hard to sit here and defend Franklin on a night he screwed the pooch, but PSU has only gotten worse since his firing.  Their best game since firing him is probably playing IU close in a loss. 

1. They are wearing Penn State jerseys. 

 

2. Unfortunately a large number of the community that covers college football are SEC shills. And they are convinced their conference is the only one with any depth. 

 

3. Think a large amount of the college football talking heads haven't caught up with the current landscape of college football where the talent is spread out across rosters more than it used to be. 

Posted
9 hours ago, Demo said:

Personally, I’m good with 12. I like the top 4 getting a bye. I get the argument for 16 and I’m ok with it as long as the 1st round games are on campus so again there’s some benefit to being a high seed. 24’s just too many for the obvious  reason that there is no universe where a team seeded, say, 20-24 is gonna win 5 games and win the Natty. Not a chance. The depth of talent between football and basketball is just too different for a football team to do that while a basketball team could.

12 is perfect, imo. 16 makes sense if you want to make sure no deserving teams get left out. Miami almost got left out last year and then made the title game, Notre Dame arguably should’ve been in too *gags*. That wouldn’t really be a risk in a 16 team playoff. But I like that there’s still some exclusivity. The regular season still matters in a 12 team playoff. Play two games and you’re sweating a bit during the playoff reveal. The only way I’d want something like a 24 team playoff is if it means we’d get marquee OOC matchups again. 

Posted
3 hours ago, Class of '66 Old Fart said:

Since you posted this 4 times are we to assume you favor a 48-team event?  Asking for a friend.

WTH happened? Yeah, my opinions are boring and redundant, but I usually try to be less blatant about it than that. 

Posted

Also really glad the 3:30-4 slaight of games is very meh today outside that OSU-Iowa game. Means I can do other things I need to be an adult and do before the IU game tonight

Posted

Have said it before and will say it again: the best thing that ever happened to inaccurate quarterbacks is the concept of the back shoulder throw. Now every ball that’s underthrown or behind a guy is reflexively referred to by the anouncers as “back shoulder”. Keelon Russell for Bama  just cut loose with an obviously underthrown ball that his WR made a nice adjustment to and the announcers are extolling the accuracy of his back shoulder throw. I swear to God. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, Demo said:

Have said it before and will say it again: the best thing that ever happened to inaccurate quarterbacks is the concept of the back shoulder throw. Now every ball that’s underthrown or behind a guy is reflexively referred to by the anouncers as “back shoulder”. Keelon Russell for Bama  just cut loose with an obviously underthrown ball that his WR made a nice adjustment to and the announcers are extolling the accuracy of his back shoulder throw. I swear to God. 

Well, bless 'bama's  lil back shoulder.

Posted

Ok, the announcer in the Bama-MSU game just pronounced Kane Wommack’s last name as W-aw-mash. As in Wabash with an m. Have I been saying it way wrong all these years because that sounds not at all close to right? 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...